Skip to comments.
House passes resolution rebuking the president on Iraq
{246-182}
CNN ^
| February 16, 2007
| Unsigned
Posted on 02/16/2007 12:41:40 PM PST by .cnI redruM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-293 next last
To: Jrabbit
This is EXACTLY how the Rats treated the troops in Viet Nam, and if they have their way, they will defund the war effort and put our troops in great danger.
That's why we all need to pray that these traitors don't GET their way.
We cannot let this happen again. EVER!
221
posted on
02/16/2007 3:34:23 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
To: bnelson44; xzins; RedRover; SandRat; jude24; blue-duncan; Corin Stormhands
"Executive Finding of Rebuke" never heard of such a thingHave you ever heard of a congressional finding of rebuke?
What the congress did was not only harmful to the nation but was unprecedented at a time when our troops are engaged in combat. So if the congress can get away with rebuking the president, the president can issue an executive order rebuking those congressmen who voted to demoralize our troops.
If congress is going to invent new games, then the rules for one side should also apply to the other.
222
posted on
02/16/2007 3:35:09 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(What happened to my tagline?)
To: American Quilter
The dems and their allies are despicable. They stink to high heaven. Their brash self centered egotism knows no bounds.
They are willing to undermine our heroes to score political points FGS!
223
posted on
02/16/2007 3:35:18 PM PST
by
eleni121
( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
To: anglian
224
posted on
02/16/2007 3:36:30 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Elections have repercussions, you reap what you sow.))
To: .cnI redruM
The first step in cutting off funds.
The first step in abandoning the troops.
This will be seen by the mullas as weakness, therefore it is the first step toward sitting in motion another major attack in the continental U.S.
All this was made possible by the American voters on November 7, 2006. They should be happy. I hope that they are.
I'm not, but, I voted the other way.
225
posted on
02/16/2007 3:42:47 PM PST
by
sport
To: bnelson44
A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one! - Alexander Hamilton
226
posted on
02/16/2007 3:43:01 PM PST
by
batter
(aka "soccer8" ~ "Better to fight for something than live for nothing" - Gen Patton)
The Relationship Between Fanatics and American Liberals
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776500/posts
227
posted on
02/16/2007 3:45:07 PM PST
by
anglian
To: Preachin'
They are too smart to do that. They will sneak it in the back door.
But remember these people wereted by the American voters.
228
posted on
02/16/2007 3:45:41 PM PST
by
sport
To: BillyBoy
I don't know why you're always so damn eager to defend Lindsey. I was perfectly aware of what his position on the resolution was. He is *my* senator, not yours.
229
posted on
02/16/2007 3:47:17 PM PST
by
ilovew
("Sure I am of this, that you have only to endure to conquer." --Sir Winston Churchill)
To: bnelson44
quite simply Paul is willing to sacrifice this nation's security on the altar of his ideology. He even joins the blame America crowd when discussing 9-11 ...yes that bunch.
He doesn't get it on the islamic insurgence...and could care less for the morale of our troops.
230
posted on
02/16/2007 3:50:17 PM PST
by
eleni121
( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
To: Faith
What about Hillary and chuckie? I didn't see them there but I could just have missed them.
231
posted on
02/16/2007 3:52:04 PM PST
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
To: Faith
WHOOPS. This is the HOUSE not the SENATE. I need a drink.
232
posted on
02/16/2007 3:52:58 PM PST
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
To: rightinthemiddle
"The Republican primary opponents of those 17 will be receiving contributions from me before the next election."That's the problem. There rarely is an opponent of an incumbent, and when there is they are not supported by the RNC.
233
posted on
02/16/2007 3:54:08 PM PST
by
Spunky
("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
To: finnman69
I am really ticked off at Walsh. I've voted for him every time he's run. I hope they find a real conservative (in Syracuse???) to run against him next time. No MO!
234
posted on
02/16/2007 3:54:17 PM PST
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
To: .cnI redruM
This is what George gets for being nice to Nancy,a kick in the teeth.
235
posted on
02/16/2007 3:57:55 PM PST
by
linn37
(Love your Phlebotomist)
To: Marysecretary
Cheers! :)
Love your tagline.
236
posted on
02/16/2007 4:05:09 PM PST
by
Faith
To: P-Marlowe
While you're at it, how about a People's Rebuke of Congress?
237
posted on
02/16/2007 4:07:14 PM PST
by
RedRover
(www.justinsharrat.com)
To: Borges
238
posted on
02/16/2007 4:12:52 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
To: anglian
"Ron Paul has a video of himself explaining his vote on his website."Ron Paul is a LIBERTARIAN who ran as a Republican in order to get elected. The Libertarians I know are against the war.
239
posted on
02/16/2007 4:13:47 PM PST
by
Spunky
("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
To: Faith
Thanks, Faith. It's something I need to remember from time to time, especially NOW when I want to lay hands on some of these folks--around their grimy little necks, of course (smile). Mxxx
240
posted on
02/16/2007 4:14:51 PM PST
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-293 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson