Not a very good prognostication for the future of the marriage institution. Even if these girls get married, what are the chances they'll view it as a lifelong commitment?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Rutles4Ever
The more things change...
2 posted on
02/15/2007 12:32:27 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Rutles4Ever
I'm reminded of a line from a long-forgotten but not too bad early 90s sitcom:
"Bad credit is forever. Marriage is until you get tired of it."
3 posted on
02/15/2007 12:32:30 PM PST by
Squawk 8888
(Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
To: Rutles4Ever
"Hooking up"?
What ever happened to "whoring around"?
4 posted on
02/15/2007 12:32:40 PM PST by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: Rutles4Ever
...a culture where young women take pride in having guilt-free sex with partners they barely know...
"I don't know anyone else who's in a relationship, do you?"
"They see relationship as draining you of everything,
friends at home think she's weird to be in a monogamous relationship.
Marriage? Probably not.Democrats.
5 posted on
02/15/2007 12:34:30 PM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(] Tagline Under Construction [)
To: Rutles4Ever
In a culture where young women take pride in having guilt-free sex with partners they barely know..... Despite what these girls desperately want to believe "hooking up" with partners they barely know is neither guilt-free, emotion-free, or consequence-free. .....and they all discover this, eventually.
6 posted on
02/15/2007 12:35:21 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: Rutles4Ever
"Sex in the City" is was a harmless sitcom. /lib
8 posted on
02/15/2007 12:37:38 PM PST by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: Rutles4Ever
Personally I have no problem if high schoolers want to date around (not condoing wanton promiscuous sex) but frankly dating a bunch of different people certainly isn't a bad thing when young.
To: Rutles4Ever
Hooking up = Sport F**king
10 posted on
02/15/2007 12:39:13 PM PST by
Snardius
(How old would you be if you didn't know how old you are?)
To: Rutles4Ever
I had to read this twice: who knew that Nolan and Aparicio are girl's names? Then again, this is Massachusetts, so it's perfectly natural that a male Nolan or Aparicio would be talking about his boyfriend.
To: Rutles4Ever
IS it healthy?!?
Sure, serially monogamous sexual relationships weren't the greatest relationship fad, and caused emotional pain because of the intimacy-break-up cycle. So to avoid pain, there was a choice: remove the sex or remove the relationship. Looks like the latter won out.
I don't like Joshua Harris's kissing dating goodbye, but avoiding sexual intimacy in a dating relationship is a good way to do away with a lot of problems that plague the path to marriage.
12 posted on
02/15/2007 12:43:31 PM PST by
dan1123
To: Rutles4Ever
Well, when the graduate these girls will always have a profession they can lay, er, fall back on.
To: Rutles4Ever
These days, any women whose been "had" by less than ten guys is a gem.
Nothing special left in their souls by the time they reach 30.
18 posted on
02/15/2007 12:48:49 PM PST by
Finalapproach29er
(Dems will impeach Bush if given a chance.)
To: Rutles4Ever
What bullshit! This is the same crowd that insists "Sex and the City" shows middle American values.
22 posted on
02/15/2007 12:52:19 PM PST by
pabianice
(LLY)
To: Rutles4Ever
'Hooking up' doesn't necessarily mean anything more than kissing.
23 posted on
02/15/2007 12:52:28 PM PST by
RDTF
(They should have put down Barbarella instead of Barbaro)
To: Rutles4Ever
This is BS. I have two teenage daughters and I can tell you that they and their girlfriends are very into having or finding a boyfriend. I am not saying it does not happen, but this article makes it sound like it is the VAST majority. It is not.
On a side note, it seems as though something is up. This is the third or fourth article I have seen over the last week or two trying to say traditional relationships are dying.
First there was the story about the majority of women are now single. It was proved to be BS, but the damage was done.
Then there was the Gays that adopt are better parents the traditional parents. A study also guilty of dishonesty.
And now this. Am I paranoid or is something afoot
24 posted on
02/15/2007 12:53:08 PM PST by
MPJackal
("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
To: Rutles4Ever
Hooking up has come to define sexual relationships for most of today's teens and young women.
Try as I might, I cannot hear this term without thinking of dogs.
To: Rutles4Ever
Nolan and Aparicio? Baseball fan parents - Nolan Ryan and Luis Aparicio?
26 posted on
02/15/2007 12:55:15 PM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Rutles4Ever
The by product is stress. If you watch TV, pay attention to the commercials. Every product being pushed to women, especially young women, claims to reduce stress.
The successful Republican candidate must pander to this need and must promise stress reduction. If not, he will lose. Those young women who go through life thinking they are stressed out will provide the margin necessary to elect the President.
There is a chicken in every pot but the stress that put it there is a killer.
27 posted on
02/15/2007 12:55:50 PM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Want a stress free life? vote Republican..)
To: Rutles4Ever
I get the impression that this is media people talking about other media people. After all, everyone I know is hooking up - ergo, Americans must be hooking up en masse.
To: Rutles4Ever
Bill Clinton approves...... he drools over the prospect of an increasingly large pool of young women available for casual sex of all descriptions.....
30 posted on
02/15/2007 12:58:14 PM PST by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson