Skip to comments.
Hooking up is the rage, but is it healthy? (Relationships? What are those?)
Boston Globe ^
| 2/13/2007
| Barbara F. Meltz
Posted on 02/15/2007 12:28:40 PM PST by Rutles4Ever
In a culture where young women take pride in having guilt-free sex with partners they barely know, Nolan and Aparicio are rarities. They have genuine boyfriends, not hook ups.
"I don't know anyone else who's in a relationship, do you?" Nolan asks Aparicio. Nope, no one else.
Hooking up has come to define sexual relationships for most of today's teens and young women. It can mean anything from kissing and touching to oral sex or intercourse. Vagueness is its hallmark. "A girl can say, 'I hooked up with so-and-so,' and no one knows what she did. It protects you and makes you a player at the same time," says Aparicio, who admits to her share of high school hook ups.
---SNIP---
"The C-word, commitment, is the dirty word," Stepp says. "They see relationship as draining you of everything, most of all of your time: You'll have no time for yourself, your girlfriends, your studies, your sports..."
Aparicio says friends at home think she's weird to be in a monogamous relationship. Nolan's relationship is enough of an anomaly among her friends that she says, "Some of them are curious about it -- like it's something foreign."
Stepp is not prudish or unrealistic enough to call for an end to hook ups. "I want girls to stop and think about what they are doing, and where it's going to lead them," she says.
Neither Nolan nor Aparacio knows what the future holds for their relationships. Marriage? Probably not. Aparicio even admits that hook ups with no strings have some appeal. Not that she's looking to break up.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dating; family; generationy; hookingup; moralabsolutes; relationships; sex; sexes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Not a very good prognostication for the future of the marriage institution. Even if these girls get married, what are the chances they'll view it as a lifelong commitment?
To: Rutles4Ever
The more things change...
2
posted on
02/15/2007 12:32:27 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Rutles4Ever
I'm reminded of a line from a long-forgotten but not too bad early 90s sitcom:
"Bad credit is forever. Marriage is until you get tired of it."
3
posted on
02/15/2007 12:32:30 PM PST
by
Squawk 8888
(Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
To: Rutles4Ever
"Hooking up"?
What ever happened to "whoring around"?
4
posted on
02/15/2007 12:32:40 PM PST
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: Rutles4Ever
...a culture where young women take pride in having guilt-free sex with partners they barely know...
"I don't know anyone else who's in a relationship, do you?"
"They see relationship as draining you of everything,
friends at home think she's weird to be in a monogamous relationship.
Marriage? Probably not.Democrats.
5
posted on
02/15/2007 12:34:30 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(] Tagline Under Construction [)
To: Rutles4Ever
In a culture where young women take pride in having guilt-free sex with partners they barely know..... Despite what these girls desperately want to believe "hooking up" with partners they barely know is neither guilt-free, emotion-free, or consequence-free. .....and they all discover this, eventually.
6
posted on
02/15/2007 12:35:21 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: L98Fiero
Or screwing around?
Guess they like to REDEFINE the SOS to keep others guessing since it's so "vague".
7
posted on
02/15/2007 12:37:27 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Rutles4Ever
"Sex in the City" is was a harmless sitcom. /lib
8
posted on
02/15/2007 12:37:38 PM PST
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: Rutles4Ever
Personally I have no problem if high schoolers want to date around (not condoing wanton promiscuous sex) but frankly dating a bunch of different people certainly isn't a bad thing when young.
To: Rutles4Ever
Hooking up = Sport F**king
10
posted on
02/15/2007 12:39:13 PM PST
by
Snardius
(How old would you be if you didn't know how old you are?)
To: Rutles4Ever
I had to read this twice: who knew that Nolan and Aparicio are girl's names? Then again, this is Massachusetts, so it's perfectly natural that a male Nolan or Aparicio would be talking about his boyfriend.
To: Rutles4Ever
IS it healthy?!?
Sure, serially monogamous sexual relationships weren't the greatest relationship fad, and caused emotional pain because of the intimacy-break-up cycle. So to avoid pain, there was a choice: remove the sex or remove the relationship. Looks like the latter won out.
I don't like Joshua Harris's kissing dating goodbye, but avoiding sexual intimacy in a dating relationship is a good way to do away with a lot of problems that plague the path to marriage.
12
posted on
02/15/2007 12:43:31 PM PST
by
dan1123
To: HamiltonJay
Personally I have no problem if high schoolers want to date around (not condoing wanton promiscuous sex) but frankly dating a bunch of different people certainly isn't a bad thing when young. I agree completely. "Commitment" should not be a hallmark of high school relationships; when young, one should play the field.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
when young, one should play the field.Why?
14
posted on
02/15/2007 12:45:53 PM PST
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: Rutles4Ever
Well, when the graduate these girls will always have a profession they can lay, er, fall back on.
To: All
Hook-up?
What about 'relationship?' Just what is that, even?
To: Jeff Chandler
"...a culture where young women take pride in having guilt-free sex with partners they barely know...
"I don't know anyone else who's in a relationship, do you?"
"They see relationship as draining you of everything,
friends at home think she's weird to be in a monogamous relationship.
Marriage? Probably not.
Democrats."
Absolutely, and just wait until she let's the puck slip by the goalie. Next comes the disposal of the 'non-viable cell mass'.
17
posted on
02/15/2007 12:48:13 PM PST
by
RinaseaofDs
(Ignorance should be painful)
To: Rutles4Ever
These days, any women whose been "had" by less than ten guys is a gem.
Nothing special left in their souls by the time they reach 30.
18
posted on
02/15/2007 12:48:49 PM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
(Dems will impeach Bush if given a chance.)
To: Snardius
19
posted on
02/15/2007 12:49:20 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
To: L98Fiero
Whatever happened to normal names?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson