Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? (Evidence it is not man made)
Canada Free Press ^ | Feb. 5th, 2007 | By Timothy Ball

Posted on 02/05/2007 9:26:36 AM PST by Rodney Kings Brain

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and that for 32 years I was a Professor of Climatology at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.

What would happen if tomorrow we were told that, after all, the Earth is flat? It would probably be the most important piece of news in the media and would generate a lot of debate. So why is it that when scientists who have studied the Global Warming phenomenon for years say that humans are not the cause nobody listens? Why does no one acknowledge that the Emperor has no clothes on?

Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: c02; climatechange; denier; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; skeptic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: cogitator
The basis for anthropogenic GW is the basic physical fact that increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations will alter Earth's radiative balance.

Cogitator, please elaborate on what you mean by "Earth's radiative balance". Without detail, that phrase could mean almost anything.
61 posted on 02/05/2007 1:24:41 PM PST by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
There were estimates of the Earth's radius spanning back to the ancient Greeks and before ... not the sort of thing a Flat Earther would be likely to think of.

I do realize that. It is why I said most scientists, not all scientists. Most did believe the earth was flat, or at least said so in their writings. There were some brave souls that risked everything when pronouncing the earth was round, but they were definitely in the minority.

62 posted on 02/05/2007 1:31:16 PM PST by technomage (You get what you want one step at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: technomage
It is why I said most scientists, not all scientists. Most did believe the earth was flat, or at least said so in their writings. There were some brave souls that risked everything when pronouncing the earth was round, but they were definitely in the minority.

Nope.

Here is a useful, if Wikipedia-based, discussion of the topic.

63 posted on 02/05/2007 1:41:47 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AaronInCarolina

Numerical units are Watts per m2.

64 posted on 02/05/2007 1:41:54 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Kings Brain
androgenic

Producing male sex hormone???

65 posted on 02/05/2007 1:43:33 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

bump


66 posted on 02/05/2007 1:46:33 PM PST by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I know, I know - I actually was reading an article about pre-hormones last night and slipped up. Thank you for pointing it out!


67 posted on 02/05/2007 1:57:13 PM PST by Rodney Kings Brain ("veritas odium parit" - "truth begets hatred")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Thanks for the graphic, cogitator. So, based upon this graphic, you are basically describing the insulative effects of greenhouse gases retaining heat from the sun to a larger degree than without greenhouse gases, am I correct? Given that assumption, would not the effect be most pronounced when measured at night, when the sun is no longer directly heating the earth? Do you know if any of the greenhouse gas effect proponents have specifically proven that evening temperatures in particular display the presence of a retaining insulation? Is it reasonable to assume that the spread between temperature highs and lows should be minimized as a result of an insulating layer of greenhouse gases? Has this phenomena been observed? I am asking these questions seriously, because I have not heard whether phenomena that should be associated with an insulating layer of greenhouse gases has truly been proven, beyond the obvious suggestion that apparently increased daytime temperatures are the result of these greenhouse gases.


68 posted on 02/05/2007 2:24:47 PM PST by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: siunevada
If Bill didn't inhale, maybe we can persuade Al to stop exhaling. That's got to be a substantial portion of our CO2 production

LOL!!

69 posted on 02/05/2007 2:29:07 PM PST by syriacus (30,000 Americans died, in 30 months, to release South Korea from Kim Il-sung's tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Kings Brain
The consensus on androgenic global warming may not be as strong as the media would have us believe. There are a lot of legitimate scientist who do doubt the C02 hypothesis.

The media is in a frenzy trying to brainwash everyone in sight because they know the evidence is against them. Notice the push to start ignoring and trivializing anyone who doesn't accept the "consensus" opinion?

70 posted on 02/05/2007 2:36:31 PM PST by 6ppc (Call Photo Reuters, that's the name, and away goes truth right down the drain. Photo Reuters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Kings Brain
I read this article. I see what the professor said about the big lie, about propaganda, about people being intimidated and afraid to tell the truth. I can tell you that is exactly my experience too, only with the American Library Association and its efforts to ensure children's access to inappropriate sexual material and criminal's access to children. And I intend to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. Dr. Tim Ball's article will help.

Here are the sentences I find key that apply to the ALA: Now I won't tip my hand further to the ALA and tell it exactly what applies where, but I am preparing a major piece on the ALA's propaganda, and Dr. Tim Ball's article will be prominently mentioned as it illustrates quite a lot analogous to the ALA's agenda to sexualize children.

SafeLibraries.org - Are Children Safe in Public Libraries?

SafeLibraries. org - Are Children Safe in Public Libraries?


71 posted on 02/05/2007 7:32:49 PM PST by plan2succeed.org (www.SafeLibraries.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Just got back in and took a look at your post.

Seems my memory may have let me down. Thank you for straightening me out. :)

72 posted on 02/05/2007 8:56:09 PM PST by technomage (You get what you want one step at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

got me :)


73 posted on 02/06/2007 3:51:48 AM PST by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: plan2succeed.org
Thank you and good luck with the ALA - this is a major issue that needs to be addressed. I know many librarians are opposed to using technology to block information and that is tragic.
74 posted on 02/06/2007 4:40:52 AM PST by Rodney Kings Brain ("veritas odium parit" - "truth begets hatred")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson