Posted on 02/02/2007 6:57:37 AM PST by areafiftyone
Ex-NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani is adding a war room director to his campaign staff. Tom O'Brien was the dep. research director at the NRCC in the '02 cycle, part of a team that the Hotline said at the time "ran circles" around Democrats. Most recently, O'Brian was the dep. comm. dir. of the MTA in NY. O'Brien took a law degree from Fordham and has taught American history.
No, reach the guy in charge of the warroom.
"You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
- Dr. Strangelove
Very good Medusa graphic Phil.
I don't know yet. Rudy's website doesn't have a list of people yet to contact.
Thanks -
A little surprise to see yourself on your PC again?
--
The TP BG version is handy
--
Hot soup, painkiller/anti-inflamatory, coffee
Sweater, heavy socks
Listen - you can like who you want for president and I will totally respect that. Rudy is raising money right now and building his team. Minor tiny issues like this when a candidate is still in exploratory stage does not mean a thing. When he decides to run that will be done. I say go after the big issues when they all start running. If that is all they can find wrong with the Rudy Giuliani campaign then he's doing a darn fine job for someone not officially running yet.
Thanks for the picture of Duncan Hunter. At least now I know what he looks like.
Really great news!
Reagan was a Conservative, wasn't he? And yet, he had consultants and PR guys and paid teams in the ground......all of the things that are NEEDED to win a primary and/or a general election and he was WELL KNOWN.
So tell me why Hunter scoffs at the money needed to run; I dare you to explain just WHY he is "better" than Reagan. LOL
Actually, no it isn't; those are the words of a political amateur.
Hunter's quote, alone, proves that he is not ready for prime time and is far less politically savvy, than I and 100s of other FREEPERS are. That should make you and the rest of his supporters worry about "your guy".
Yes, it is.
Yes, it certainly is.
I'm really glad that you mentioned Cunningham; you should ponder that name and his deeds, about now.
bttt
Yes, EVERY single candidate should and MUST be put under the microscope and probed. Just picking someone, because one "believes" a surface image and/or a few stray bits of information, and then promoting him or her, is not a wise thing to do. Who knows what lurks beneath the surface, of an UNKNOWN ?
KABOOM!
Thank you! I am getting fed up of only Rudy being under the microscope here and the others getting a free pass!
..I agree
Scrutinize everyone equally. Unfortunately, no matter who your candidate is, we can never get a fair shake by the MSM
BTW PAC 10 refs are the worst...
You know... That there is NOTHING IN THE WORLD I COULD SAY TO CHANGE YOUR VERY INTELLIGENT MINDS? Correct?...Yes. So why waste time.
We should all pat ourselves on the back some, for being a bit friendlier today - AS IT SHOULD BE. Because we are on the same team.
Good night :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.