Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Head of DNA lab says he and Nifong agreed not to report results
The NEws & Observer ^ | Dec 15, 2006 02:07 PM | Joseph Neff, Benjamin Niolet and Anne Blythe

Posted on 12/15/2006 12:00:48 PM PST by nj_pilot

The head of a private DNA laboratory said under oath today that he and District Attorney Mike Nifong agreed not to report DNA results favorable to Duke lacrosse players charged with rape.

Brian Meehan, director of DNA Security of Burlington, said his lab found DNA from unidentified men in the underwear, pubic hair and rectum of the woman who said she was gang-raped at a lacrosse party in March. Nurses at Duke Hospital collected the samples a few hours after the alleged assault. Meehan said the DNA did not come from Reade Seligmann, David Evans, or Collin Finnerty, who have been charged with rape and sexual assault in the case.

Meehan struggled to say why he didn’t include the favorable evidence in a report dated May 12, almost a month after Seligmann and Finnerty had been indicted. He cited concerns about the privacy of the lacrosse players, his discussions at several meetings with Nifong, and the fact that he didn’t know whose DNA it was.

Under questioning by Jim Cooney, a defense attorney for Seligmann, Meehan admitted that his report violated his laboratory’s standards by not reporting results of all tests.

Did Nifong and his investigators know the results of all the DNA tests? Cooney asked.

“I believe so,” Meehan said.

“Did they know the test results excluded Reade Seligmann?” Cooney asked.

“I believe so,” Meehan said.

Was the failure to report these results the intentional decision of you and the district attorney? Cooney asked.

“Yes,” Meehan replied.

At that answer, several people in the packed courtroom clapped. Superior Court Judge W. Osmond Smith III warned the standing-room only crowd to be quiet or leave.

Meehan’s testimony differed from a statement Nifong made at the beginning of today’s hearing.

“The first I had heard of this particular situation was when I was served with this particular motion” on Wednesday, Nifong told the judge. After court, Nifong clarified his remarks to say that he knew about the DNA results.

"And we were trying to, just as Dr. Meehan said, trying to avoid dragging any names through the mud but at the same time his report made it clear that all the information was available if they wanted it and they have every word of it,” Nifong said.

Joseph B. Cheshire V, a lawyer for Evans, said he was troubled by today’s testimony.

“If any of the lacrosse players were excluded, they simply wouldn’t put it in the report,” he said. “It raises some troublesome questions about (Nifong), who has an obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence and turn it over to the defense.”

In a response to reports that the accuser in the Duke lacrosse case gave birth recently, UNC Health care issued a statement at about 1:30 p.m. saying that the woman is at UNC Hospitals for care related to her pregnancy but has not given birth.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: dukelax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-222 next last
To: r9etb

True, but you left out a key ingredient. Nifong is a white guy trying to get re-elected in a town that is predominantly black. If he didn't prosecute he would have pissed off his constituency and not been re-elected.

Not an apology, just a fact. The man should be in jail.


81 posted on 12/15/2006 12:52:42 PM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nj_pilot

I'd sure like to see nifong doing the jail time he has tried to get for these young men.


82 posted on 12/15/2006 12:52:53 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here
Why are you bypassing the state?

Why not invoke the civil rights violation(s) under Federal statues. The NC state structure sure isn't doing anything.

83 posted on 12/15/2006 12:53:00 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: delphirogatio
I heard a commentator say that NC has no "speedy trial" reference in its laws....fwiw

That just shows you how stupid commentators are - the right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by the 6th Amendment to the US Constitution - it is not up to the states.

84 posted on 12/15/2006 12:54:42 PM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: All

Fromm NC Dept of Department of Justice
Attorney General Roy Cooper

(http://www.ncdoj.com/default_contactus_form.jsp?sectionid=ag&subsectionid=general)

District Attorneys:
In North Carolina, district attorneys are Constitutional officers directly elected by the people in the district where they serve and are not a part of the Attorney General's Office. Complaints against a member of a local district attorney's office should be directed to the staff member's immediate supervisor and, if unresolved, to the district attorney.



from the Constitution of North Carolina

(http://statelibrary.dcr.state.nc.us/nc/stgovt/article_iv.htm)

Sec. 18. District Attorney and Prosecutorial Districts.

(1) District Attorneys. The General Assembly shall, from time to time, divide the State into a convenient number of prosecutorial districts, for each of which a District Attorney shall be chosen for a term of four years by the qualified voters thereof, at the same time and places as members of the General Assembly are elected. Only persons duly authorized to practice law in the courts of this State shall be eligible for election or appointment as a District Attorney. The District Attorney shall advise the officers of justice in his district, be responsible for the prosecution on behalf of the State of all criminal actions in the Superior Courts of his district, perform such duties related to appeals therefrom as the Attorney General may require, and perform such other duties as the General Assembly may prescribe.

From what I read here , this guy is responsible only to himself


85 posted on 12/15/2006 12:56:36 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nj_pilot
Curiouser and curiouser.
86 posted on 12/15/2006 12:58:26 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
That just shows you how stupid commentators are - the right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by the 6th Amendment to the US Constitution - it is not up to the states.

That's true, but the federal speedy trial right is pretty amorphous, as I recall.

For instance, in my state, if you assert speedy trial, the state has 70 days to bring the case. I'm not aware of any Supreme Court decision that puts a time limit on federal speedy trial right, so it becomes a question of "how long is too long?"

Also, I don't know if the boys have asserted speedy trial, which is certainly possible. Speedy trial is a right that must be demanded.

87 posted on 12/15/2006 1:01:53 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: delphirogatio

Federal charges of violation of the players' civil rights and consprircy may be pretty good to hang this bastard out to dry.


88 posted on 12/15/2006 1:10:55 PM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

"Nifong, you piece of crap."

How dare you call Nifong a piece of crap.
Now I would never do that to a piece of crap.
Nifong is so much lower, more dirty than crap.
He makes crap smell like a high price perfume!!!


89 posted on 12/15/2006 1:12:51 PM PST by fabriclady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck; delphirogatio
...yet I think that when Nifong moved the trial to next year, the DoJ should have jumped.

Something 'bout "...the right to a speedy trial....".

>I heard a commentator say that NC has no "speedy trial" reference in its laws....fwiw

U.S. Constitution - Amendment 6

Amendment 6 - Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

There are numerous Civil Rights violations here. The DOJ should've been on this months ago.

This is the kind of stuff that angers me about Bush and his administration.

90 posted on 12/15/2006 1:13:46 PM PST by Tinian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

He was just reelected - and that is evidence the sheeple don't care about anything!


91 posted on 12/15/2006 1:13:57 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nj_pilot

I don't understand how reporting that no lacrosse players' DNA was found violates the players' privacy? What is private about it being known that they did NOT have sexual relations with that woman?


92 posted on 12/15/2006 1:15:36 PM PST by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Youngman442002

If you're hung it should only be known in private. You can be hanged in public however.


93 posted on 12/15/2006 1:16:37 PM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck
"Why not invoke the civil rights violation(s) under Federal statues. The NC state structure sure isn't doing anything"

If this was a White Southern DA prosecuting a bunch of poor black boys for spiting in the back of a bus, The media, Federal and State prosecutors and Geraldo would be going 24/7 with the story. Rich white prep boys are not worthy.
94 posted on 12/15/2006 1:17:28 PM PST by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker
politically charged case to get reelected.

Not re-elected. He was never elected to begin with, he was appointed by Governor Michael Easley. And you wonder why Easley has been so silent.

95 posted on 12/15/2006 1:18:47 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
And you wonder why Easley has been so silent.

For that matter, why has there been such silence from Nancy Grace, Kimberly Guilfoyle and the rest of the cable TV legal "experts" who had these lacrosse players strapped to the gurney?

96 posted on 12/15/2006 1:24:01 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: nj_pilot


97 posted on 12/15/2006 1:25:42 PM PST by Main Street (Stuck in traffic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj_pilot
Holy cow!

Nifong and Meehan colluded to perpetrate criminal acts and now, at last, it is out in the open.

98 posted on 12/15/2006 1:28:41 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay

Yes, he should.


99 posted on 12/15/2006 1:29:05 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nj_pilot

It looks like Nifong just perjured himself.


100 posted on 12/15/2006 1:30:09 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson