Posted on 12/14/2006 3:16:44 PM PST by Incorrigible
BY JAMES LILEKS
In another display of pitch-perfect priorities, the U.N. has released its findings on cow flatulence. There's quite a lot of it.
The 400-page study, $27 million of which probably went to Saddam Hussein for old times' sake, discovered that the planet's livestock, including 1.5 billion cattle, produce 18 percent of greenhouse gases. Apparently the beasts of the field do nothing but wander around all day asking their brethren to "pull my hoof." Every time a cow feels a small sense of relief, a polar bear goes through the ice.
Or will, eventually. So livestock give off more greenhouse gases than cars. Eliminate the internal combustion problem, and you'd still have to deal with numberless tons of ruminant redolence floating into Gaia's celestial nostrils. We're off the hook: If global warming is organic, doesn't that make it OK?
Of course not. You can infer the report's purpose from its title: "Livestock's Long Shadow." Meat-eating and the industries required to sustain it are the actual villains, and the list of sins is enormous. As the Independent newspaper put it, the damage ranges "from acid rain to the introduction of alien species, from producing deserts to creating dead zones in the oceans, from poisoning rivers and drinking water to destroying coral reefs."
Death to cows! Who's letting them bellyflop on the reefs, anyway?
Obligatory serious-face moment: It is bad that poor farming practices damage the Earth. It is wise to manage livestock pollution well. Introducing aliens is not wise, especially if they're Klingons and Vulcans, who never get along.
But if you think the purpose of such reports is to underscore the need for reasonable approaches to feeding the increased demand for meat, you have a fine opinion of our betters.
America is not their model; America is the example of what is wrong with progress. The idea of people living in large houses with nice lawns, driving a personal vehicle (by themselves, on the route of their choosing) to the store to buy big steaks subsequently cooked on a carbon-emitting outdoor grill -- well, who wants to live like that?
About 6 billion people, if you give them the chance. But forgive them, Kofi; they know not what they do.
The idea of people sitting at home in sweatpants watching a big TV while shoveling in the Haagen-Daz mortifies the social engineers; they can practically feel the planet wobble on its axis from the cumulative weight of so much freedom and prosperity.
The preferred model for a nice, controlled population is a dense city where your small apartment has a tiny fridge stocked with bean curd molded into pleasant, food-like shapes. Trains take you to your job, which is either building trains, fixing trains, designing public service posters for trains, cleaning trains or writing software to operate trains. Once a week you'll pull on your best taupe-hued hemp jumpsuit and take the train to the biweekly Culture Expo to hear something held up to enlightened ridicule (anything's game, except Islam and Global Warming).
It may sound like hell itself, but at least it's sustainable.
Will the Earth survive Big Macs? Quite possibly. The Earth is so sturdy it took a meteor that reset the clock, and even then everything grew back in a new and improved form. (We still have soulless reptiles eating other soulless reptiles, but they're confined to entertainment litigation.)
The world will probably survive gassy Bossies. It's even possible that 100 years hence, science will have concluded that butter is good for you, oil is produced by recurring organic processes, and cyclical weather variations are the result of that big yellow thing in the sky.
If so, the 21st century's apocalyptic dogmas will look rather silly. The most egregious overheating, it might turn out, was in the scientific climate, not the real one.
Or we'll all be up to our necks in melted glaciers, in which case we'll all ride cows to work. They'll learn to swim. Nature's clever that way.
Dec. 13, 2006
(James Lileks can be contacted at newhouse@lileks.com)
Not for commercial use. For educational use only.
*APPLAUSE* Very cute. :)
I voted. Looks like today was the last day.
Thanks!!
Global Warming/Humor ping.
This is an interesting thought though; will this encourage more cow eating?
If so, will PETA start attacking the UN?
Who's there?
Interrupting cow
Interrupting co..
MOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Two words, Ron White.
This doesn't help, either.
Sounds like Kinky Friedman when he explained why he smoked Cuban cigars: "I'm not supporting their economy, I'm burning their fields."
#1CTYankee,
Just to make you aware, I am a Tennessee, Southern redneck gal, and we have one word that sums up our answer to the dilemna:
Barbeque (grin)
See post 29 for my answer to the problem.
Great cartoon.
Bags are only a temporary solutions. We had better figure out how to build fart sequestration sinks or the world is doomed!
Too funny, though I wonder how long it will be before the Useless Nothings try to mandate something stupid like this. Which will in turn upset the AR wackos, so I think that to avoid offending anyone we should all become vegan!
LOL Thats pretty funny!
Who says someone for Tennessee and Connecticut don't have something in common, bring on the meat!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.