Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Cheney's Pregnancy Affects Us All
Townhall ^ | December 7, 2006 | Janice Shaw Crouse PhD, Concerned Women for America

Posted on 12/08/2006 8:31:16 PM PST by rakovskii

Mary Cheney’s pregnancy poses problems not just for her child, but also for all Americans. Her action repudiates traditional values and sets an appalling example for young people at a time when father absence is the most pressing social problem facing the nation. With 37 percent of American children born to fatherless families, Mary Cheney is contributing to a trend that is detrimental to all Americans who will live with the ramifications of millions of children whose anger and frustration at not knowing their father will be felt in the public schools and communities of our nation.

Mary Cheney is among that burgeoning group of adult women over age 20 that are driving the trend of women who don’t want a man in the picture, but want to have a baby. These older women are pushing out-of-wedlock birth statistics higher and higher. At a time when teen births and teen abortions are declining dramatically, older women are having more un-wed births and more abortions, including repeat abortions (indicating that they are using abortion as birth control).

Well-educated, professional Mary Cheney is flying in the face of the accumulated wisdom of the top experts who agree that the very best family structure for a child’s well-being is a married mom and dad family. Her child will have all the material advantages it will need, but it will still encounter the emotional devastation common to children without fathers.

One Georgia high school principal reported, “We have too many young men and women from single-mother families that don’t have the role models at home to teach them how to deal with adversity and handle responsibility. They’ve seen their mom work 60 hours a week just to put food on the table; they end up fending for themselves.”

When fatherless children get to be teens, the girls tend to start looking for love in all the wrong places and the boys tend to find as their role model the bad-boy celebrities of MTV, NFL and NBA.

As they grow older, fatherless children tend to have trouble dealing with male authority figures. Too often children in single-mother households end up angry at their absent fathers and resentful of the mother who has had to be a father figure, too. Typically, the boys who have a love-hate relationship with their mother end up hating all women. Numerous of them look for vulnerable women where they can act out their anger and be in control.

Mary Cheney’s action sets an example that is detrimental for mothers with less financial resources who will start down an irrevocable path into poverty that tends to be generational –– children in households without a father tend to themselves have unwed births later in life. Experts from both the left and the right cite a disastrous litany of negative outcomes that are predictable when a child grows up in a fatherless family. Such children tend to get involved in drugs, alcohol abuse, and delinquency; they tend to drop out of school and have teen pregnancies. An assistant principal in a Junior High School said that many of the behavioral problems that teachers face in the classroom stem from households without a father’s influence.

Mary’s pregnancy is an “in-your-face” action countering the Bush Administration’s pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies. She continues to repudiate the work to which her father has devoted his life. Mary has repeatedly said that “studies” show that children only need a loving home. Her statement is incomplete because the experts agree that for the well-being of children, they desperately need a married father and a mother.

All those people who talk about doing what is best “for our children” need to get back to the basics: children need a married mom and dad. Children can do without a lot of the trimmings of childhood, but nothing can replace a home where the mother and dad love each other enough to commit for a lifetime and are absolutely crazy about their kids –– enough to be willing to sacrifice their own needs to see that their children get the very best.

Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Senior Fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, a culturally conservative think tank for Concerned Women for America, is a recognized authority on domestic issues, the United Nations, cultural and women’s concerns.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antifamily; antifamilyvalues; cheney; fatherlesschild; gay; heterosexualagenda; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marycheney; pregnancy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 781-795 next last
To: misterrob
You don't know how things will turn out but if Mom and her "friend" are willing to love the kid then that's a hell of a lot better then some of the other horror shows that pass themselves off as parents. And, some kids are simply better off not knowing Da

What you are saying is, because some heterosexuals fail, there should be no standards at all, and no one should be allowed to tell the politically incorrect truth that gays as a statistical group do not produce as high a percentage of well-adjusted children. You are ignoring the natural rights and needs of the defenseless child in favor of indulging the desires of the gay adults.

181 posted on 12/08/2006 10:21:57 PM PST by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GregH

Because it serves an illustrative point.

The head of the Evangelicals in this country lived a lie, and taught his followers all kinds of stuff that he personally did not live, regarding homosexuality.

Now, if posters here can hurl all kinds of nonsense and generalizations about gay couples, then, I can hurl all kinds of nonsense and generalizations about evangelicals. Of course I am using this as an example of reductio ad absurdium to point out the flaws in the arguments of those that think that all gay parents are some kind of monsters.

Sorry you didn't catch it.


182 posted on 12/08/2006 10:22:06 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
Children need a mother and a father.

Yes, they do. And men take off....

183 posted on 12/08/2006 10:23:07 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
How does a mother raise a son, whose father was killed or died from some terrible disease?

What about all of those boys who were raised by men, in BOYS' TOWN, or in other orphanages, raised by only women?

184 posted on 12/08/2006 10:23:40 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rakovskii

My guess is that Mary Cheney and her partner will make much better parents than Britney Spears and her soon to be ex husband. It's not just about having a man and a woman around to call mom and dad, but it's also about the quality of the parent the kids get. And I speak as someone who, for many years, was raised by her grandmother.


185 posted on 12/08/2006 10:25:16 PM PST by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Don't go trying to bring logic into a topic like this. Some folks hate gays, its their right. A generation ago some folks hated minorities.

Like I said, change comes slowly, sadly, one funeral at a time.


186 posted on 12/08/2006 10:25:36 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: paulat

And you're singling out men because...?


187 posted on 12/08/2006 10:25:50 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Marie2

Marie, bless your heart, it is true that a child without a father is a tragedy. I know. My father was killed in an industrial accident when I was just shy of 5.

Here's how it affected me.

I own my own business and have employed more than 125 people over the last 20 years.

I have three children, a daughter who is a specialist in oncology nursing, and a leader in BSF (Bible Study Fellowship); a son who is a highschool teacher and fishing guide; and another son who is an electrical engineer. Both sons lead worship in their respective churches.

I have 8 grandchildren: a grandson who is a graduate in communications and martial arts boxer, writer and teacher, with a wife working on her PhD, with two daughters of their own; a granddaugher who is a sophomore at a renowned Christian school, who is aiming for a careeer in motion pictures; a grandson who is studying Engineering at one of the top schools in the country (valedictorian in his class, last year); a granddaughter who will graduate valedictorian in her class this spring and a starter on her state championship basketball team; her sister, another granddaughter, also a starter on that same championship team, who will probably get a basketball scholarship when she graduates, a junior in High School; and four other grandkids who have yet to establish where they will land.

The point is their grandfather had no father, their great grand mother came from a broken home and their parents had no real father in their life.

Mary Cheney, although a lesbian with a lesbian partner has more going for her child than my children and grandchildren...a fabulous grandfather and grandmother.

I think the child will be OK


188 posted on 12/08/2006 10:26:32 PM PST by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

America was a far better place when the perverts were in the closet, or at least lived in isolated areas like New York's Greenwich Village away from most decent people. Vice and immorality have always existed, but only because of the effects of the sexual revolution and the New Left is what has been condemned by convention and social norms lauded as an "alternative lifestyle".


189 posted on 12/08/2006 10:26:37 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I have three grand children who became fatherless just about a month ago. Ages 8, 12 and 14. My daughter is 33 years old and now has to be the only parent raisng those children, unless she some day decides to remarry. It will be tough for her but I am confident that she can do it and do a good job of it too.

You have no idea how hard it is. Ask someone who has done it -- especially if the father decides to behave capriciously with support, visitation or custody. It can be hell on earth. Buckle your seat belt. There's a lot more to it than pep talks.

190 posted on 12/08/2006 10:26:49 PM PST by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
If children *needed* a mother and a father - if that were *a truth* then any children who did not have a mother and a father would not survive - and we know that is not true.

It is preferable that children have a mother and a father - and beyond that it is hoped that children have loving and decent mothers and fathers. Unfortunately , reality does not mirror the ideal. I believe that the divorce rate among heterosexuals is close to 50%. That is a real problem for those who believe that children *need* a mother and father. And then there are the fathers who are so bad that the children would be better off without them.

But beyond that - we are a free country and people who, imo, probably shouldn't have children - do. And they are free to do it - including Mary Cheney. My guess is that Mary Cheney's kid will turn out just fine...as is my sister's kid who is being raised by a single mom.

191 posted on 12/08/2006 10:27:30 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

*Just remember they can vote in an illness like "conservative personality disorder" just as easily..*



That is a stretch


192 posted on 12/08/2006 10:28:04 PM PST by SoCalPol (We Need A Border Fence Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
gays as a statistical group do not produce as high a percentage of well-adjusted children

What's your source on this?

193 posted on 12/08/2006 10:28:31 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

America will be a far better place when intolerant close minded folks that hide behind the bible to spew hate are gone.


Its really none of your business.

Or, maybe you, being such a great conservative would like to have the government legislate their personal lives and how they raise kids?

LOL


194 posted on 12/08/2006 10:28:46 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
It is preferable that children have a mother and a father...

By God, there may be hope yet.

195 posted on 12/08/2006 10:29:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

"The "some of my best friends are gay" defense for radically changing the lives of children is vacuous at best and evil in its lazy narcissism. Children need a mother and a father."

Bravo, best economy-of-words post yet on the traditional family side.

When is comes to Mary C's case. If she asked me for my opinion on her pregnancy, I would say ....

It is great you are having a baby and there is nothing better than babies (I'm not quite such a jerk that I would condemn an already pregnant woman). But Mary C. you are young yet and don't become too parochial in your viewpoints. There is so much to learn in this world. Learn and grow all you can and seek to find out the importance of God in everyone's life and the importance of even us weak mortal men in the life of a child.


196 posted on 12/08/2006 10:29:49 PM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a Russian AK-47 and a French bikini.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
America was a far better place when the perverts were in the closet, or at least lived in isolated areas like New York's Greenwich Village away from most decent people

Decent people like Ted Haggard, and Paul Crouch?

197 posted on 12/08/2006 10:30:31 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Every civilization that has accepted deviant lifestlyes as a norm has been near the end of it's cycle.

That's always such a cute argument - "the sky is falling if I don't get my way". Of course you are free to believe whatever you want - but our country and society are still quite healthy and will survive. I suspect that scares the far right and the far left more than just about anything :-)

198 posted on 12/08/2006 10:31:35 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: billbears
...the fringe aspect of the Republican party that believes moral laws should be established at the national level that's making it a big deal. The very idea is an affront to the vision the Framers had for this union of states.

You are totally, completely ignorant of our nation's history. Wishing will not make it the way you believe it was. The states, as was their right, had established churches, with compulsory attendance in many cases. Moral laws were passed and recognized because the population was 99% Christian.

199 posted on 12/08/2006 10:32:01 PM PST by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

LOL, do you have a crush on Ted or something, or is he the only heterosexual you know?


200 posted on 12/08/2006 10:32:39 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 781-795 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson