Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Be Aware Of Registered Sex Offenders In Your Neighborhood!
familywatchdog.us ^

Posted on 12/02/2006 5:53:18 AM PST by Man50D

Many people are not aware a registered sex offender maybe living in their neighborhood. Recently a local radio station in my area referred its listners to FamilyWatchdog. Many were shocked to find the number of sex offenders living nearby. I couldn't help but think this is also true for people nationwide. Consequently I am providing the link to Freepers. Just enter your street address, city, state and zipcode in the windows provided at the homepage then click search. A map will appear showing where registered sex offenders live and work near you. There is a map legend to help you interpret the symbols. There are many other features at the website too numerous to mention. I'll let you discover them on your own. Please be aware your state may have laws preventing anyone from harassing registered sex offenders but by knowing where they live we can hopefully keep everyone's kids safe!


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: pedophiles; sexcrimes; sexoffenderregistry; sexoffenders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2006 5:53:20 AM PST by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"Many were shocked to find the number of sex offenders living nearby."

They shouldn't be, given the low threshold for qualifying as one.

2 posted on 12/02/2006 6:00:16 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"They shouldn't be, given the low threshold for qualifying as one."

In the joint snitches are as reviled as child molesters, so CNN and MSNBC need to push for laws informing Americans of tattletales and busybodies in every neighborhood, telling lies and slandering little children.

3 posted on 12/02/2006 6:03:58 AM PST by 100-Fold_Return (I'll Never Be Broke Another Day in My Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I used the TX Meagan's law database and DID NOT buy two houses thanks to the information found on it. My Realtor did not tell me to look, but i made it a priority. Everyone should look about twice a year.


4 posted on 12/02/2006 6:04:53 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I checked, using my address. I was surprised at the wrong information given---as to distance from my address. If you can't trust that, can you trust the rest of it?


5 posted on 12/02/2006 6:23:35 AM PST by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty
Last year we moved out of a townhouse in a complex when the management refused to do anything about the RSO who was living there. The complex had a playground and a swimming pool and claimed to be family friendly.

We complained to the management and showed them a printout from the database. They said that they only considered credit rating (not criminal or sex offender status) when making a decision as to whether or not to rent to someone.

We told our neighbors with children about the RSO but were told that we could not post signs (the RSO might sue us for harassment). The RSO always had very fancy Christmas ans Halloween decorations.

6 posted on 12/02/2006 6:28:43 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

In Pueblo, CO., nobody has to 'guess'. As soon as law enforcement learns an offender is moving into a neighborhood, they call a townhall meeting and famiiarize everybody with the perp by showing his picture and the crimes he's committed.


7 posted on 12/02/2006 6:34:04 AM PST by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
I checked, using my address. I was surprised at the wrong information given---as to distance from my address. If you can't trust that, can you trust the rest of it?

If you are to assume all the information is wrong then you are also assuming a sexual predator does not live at a location marked where a sexual predator lives according to the map. That could be a dangerous assumption. It would be prudent to err on the side of caution and assume that portion of the data is correct.

The website has a page where you can submit feedback. Click on "contact us" and scroll down towards the bottom. Keep in mind these people are volunteers who are trying to do their best. I'm sure they would welcome your input.
8 posted on 12/02/2006 6:37:41 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Okay--will do!


9 posted on 12/02/2006 6:39:40 AM PST by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reg45
We told our neighbors with children about the RSO but were told that we could not post signs (the RSO might sue us for harassment). The RSO always had very fancy Christmas ans Halloween decorations.

You may want to check with your local police department if signs can be posted informing people where the RSO lives. It may not be considered harassment. Harassment may mean direct contact with the RSO but not include posting signs.
10 posted on 12/02/2006 6:42:08 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Police and prosecutors use laws to "pile on" whenever they arrest or charge somebody. I've heard of cases where they got a beer-drinking college student who was taking a leak outdoors and charged him as a "sex offender". The priority seems to be to create as many "felons" as possible so as to be able to deny those persons constitutional rights for the rest of their lives. Often it seems they'll charge some kind of felony which any paid lawyer can have dismissed, usually in exchange for the defendant pleading out to lesser misdemeanors. The laws are abused as "bargaining chips" and, since the state has unlimited resources to prosecute and the individual usually has limited funds to defend himself, they get away with it. I'd like to see cops and prosecutors held personally liable for expenses and damages resulting from their intentional "over-charging".


11 posted on 12/02/2006 6:52:32 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
They shouldn't be, given the low threshold for qualifying as one.

That's twice in two days that I agree with you.

I think I need a nap ;-)

12 posted on 12/02/2006 6:53:57 AM PST by Wormwood (Enjoy this post while it lasts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
"That's twice in two days that I agree with you. I think I need a nap ;-)"

Trust me. That fact scares me as much as it does you.

13 posted on 12/02/2006 6:56:34 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Thank you!


14 posted on 12/02/2006 7:00:49 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

Yeah, there's 2 or 3 around here. Info was, as you said, incorrect. And the individuals are well known to everybody and haven't been in any kind of trouble for 20 or 30 years. Not only that, they are old and decrepit and probably not capable of doing much harm any more.


15 posted on 12/02/2006 7:08:42 AM PST by Past Your Eyes (Do what you love and the ridicule will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Trust me. That fact scares me as much as it does you.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Flawless Victory

16 posted on 12/02/2006 7:09:41 AM PST by Wormwood (Enjoy this post while it lasts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

ML/NJ

17 posted on 12/02/2006 7:24:57 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Love the site. It's the best because it differentiates between someone who is an offender of children and the other sexual cases. The 17 yr old boys who are boinking their 16 yr old girlfriends and get a statutory rape charge do not frighten me at all but you gotta watch out for those red dots.


18 posted on 12/02/2006 7:31:52 AM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

There were only 4 listed in my county and I knew there were more so I went to another site and there are 25. I think you need a better source.


19 posted on 12/02/2006 7:35:10 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki

I'm not saying he's always right but my brother is a cop and this is the site he recommends. Maybe those other people have already moved or maybe they were just tried and not convicted. Just because one site has more doesn't automatically make it correct.


20 posted on 12/02/2006 7:48:39 AM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson