Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/10/2006 4:08:53 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: blam
Hmmm...
2 posted on 11/10/2006 4:10:07 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe; LucyT
Other FR Vitamin-D articles here.
3 posted on 11/10/2006 4:11:12 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Quite interesting... thanks for the post.


5 posted on 11/10/2006 4:15:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Thanks! Cold and Flu season. Time to supplement.
6 posted on 11/10/2006 4:17:57 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Wow! Yet more good news about the sunshine vitamin.

And at about five cents a day, you can bet if it was comin out now big pharma would be fighting tooth and nail to have it banned!


7 posted on 11/10/2006 4:24:48 PM PST by djf (Islam!! There's a flag on the moon! Guess whose? Hint: Not yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Very interesting. Unfortunately the article fails to say anything about dosages.

Vitamin D deficiency must be increased by the spreading use of sun blockers, no?


8 posted on 11/10/2006 4:27:42 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

full spectrum lighting in the home?


13 posted on 11/10/2006 6:02:04 PM PST by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Bump to save...


15 posted on 11/10/2006 6:48:21 PM PST by dcwusmc (The government is supposed to fit the Constitution, NOT the Constitution fit the government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

For later


20 posted on 11/10/2006 9:29:36 PM PST by Marie Antoinette (Proud Clinton-hater since 1998. Sporkweasels Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam


bump for later...


23 posted on 11/10/2006 10:01:17 PM PST by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
My thanks also. I am always interested in how to avoid colds and the flu. I get plenty of sun but maybe not enough vitamin D.
25 posted on 11/10/2006 10:38:06 PM PST by Daaave (Use only as directed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo

Interesting ping


26 posted on 11/10/2006 10:40:03 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Vitamin D may cut pancreatic cancer risk by nearly half
Eureka Alert ^ | 09.12.06 | Warren Froelich


Posted on 09/14/2006 9:10:47 PM CDT by Coleus


PHILADELPHIA -- Consumption of Vitamin D tablets was found to cut the risk of pancreatic cancer nearly in half, according to a study led by researchers at Northwestern and Harvard universities. The findings point to Vitamin D's potential to prevent the disease, and is one of the first known studies to use a large-scale epidemiological survey to examine the relationship between the nutrient and cancer of the pancreas. The study, led by Halcyon Skinner, Ph.D., of Northwestern, appears in the September issue of Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

The study examined data from two large, long-term health surveys and found that taking the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowance of Vitamin D (400 IU/day) reduced the risk of pancreatic cancer by 43 percent. By comparison, those who consumed less than 150 IUs per day experienced a 22 percent reduced risk of cancer. Increased consumption of the vitamin beyond 400 IUs per day resulted in no significant increased benefit.

"Because there is no effective screening for pancreatic cancer, identifying controllable risk factors for the disease is essential for developing strategies that can prevent cancer," said Skinner. "Vitamin D has shown strong potential for preventing and treating prostate cancer, and areas with greater sunlight exposure have lower incidence and mortality for prostate, breast, and colon cancers, leading us to investigate a role for Vitamin D in pancreatic cancer risk. Few studies have examined this association, and we did observe a reduced risk for pancreatic cancer with higher intake of Vitamin D."

Skinner, currently in the Department of Population Health Sciences at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, and his colleagues analyzed data from two long-term studies of health and diet practices, conducted at Harvard University. They looked at data on 46,771 men aged 40 to 75 years who took part in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and 75,427 women aged 38 to 65 years who participated in the Nurses' Health Study. Between the two studies, they identified 365 cases of pancreatic cancer. The surveys are considered valuable for their prospective design, following health trends instead of looking at purely historical information, high follow-up rates and the ability to enable researchers like Skinner to incorporate data from two independent studies.

Pancreatic cancer is a rapidly fatal disease and the fourth-leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. This year, the American Cancer Society estimates that 32,000 new cases of cancer will be diagnosed. About the same number of people will die this year from the disease. It has no known cure, and surgical treatments are not often effective. Except for cigarette smoking, no environmental factors or dietary practices have been linked to the disease.

In addition to Vitamin D, the researchers also measured the association between pancreatic cancer and the intakes of calcium and retinol (Vitamin A). Calcium and retinol intakes showed no association with pancreatic cancer risk, although retinol is an antagonist of Vitamin D's ability to influence mineral balances and bone integrity. For that reason, further research is necessary to determine if Vitamin D ingestion from dietary sources, like eggs, liver and fatty fish or fortified dairy products, or through sun exposure might be preferable to multi-vitamin supplements, which contain retinol.

The potential benefits of vitamin D for pancreatic cancer were only recently established by other laboratory studies. Normal and cancerous pancreas tissue contain high levels of the enzyme that converts circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D into 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, the vitamin's active form. Other studies have shown an anti-cell proliferation effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, potentially inhibiting tumor cells. "In concert with laboratory results suggesting anti-tumor effects of Vitamin D, our results point to a possible role for Vitamin D in the prevention and possible reduction in mortality of pancreatic cancer. Since no other environmental or dietary factor showed this risk relationship, more study of Vitamin D's role is warranted," Skinner said.


45 posted on 11/11/2006 12:02:28 AM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Great article..thnx for the ping.


46 posted on 11/11/2006 3:41:18 AM PST by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Health bump.


47 posted on 11/11/2006 4:38:28 AM PST by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
This is interesting.

I have lived in Asia for over a decade, and though my Chinese friends think myself, my wife and my child are overweight (by their standards we are; by US standards we look like Twiggy), they marvel at how infrequently we get colds and flu compared to them.

One thing we do, especially my little one, is we drink milk--lots of it, and we are not afraid of being in the sun. In fact, living in a major urban area, whenever we have the chance of going out to a park on a sunny day, it is like going to Disneyland.

Contrast that with our Chinese friends, especially women. They typically don't drink much milk (that is changing), go to great links to avoid exposure to the sun (the women especially will stay out of sunlight) and get the flu much more often than we do.

Yes, this is anecdotal, at least insofar as my family and I are concerned.

But one thing that is not in doubt: Virulent flus almost always emerge from China--especially south China. Is it possible that there is a cultural aspect to this reality? Namely, that Chinese aversion of milk (if it has vitamin D) and aversion to the sun (which naturally creates vitamin D for us) leads to a vitamin D deficiency and, thus, reduced immunity to the flu?

48 posted on 11/11/2006 4:54:26 AM PST by twntaipan (Mad about new taxes coming your way from the dhimmicrats in Congress? Thank your local libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Very interesting. Maybe some of those tb sanitariums which were located in the mountains did some good. I think the patients used to sit on the porches. Were the porches on the south side of the building?


49 posted on 11/11/2006 5:07:49 AM PST by syriacus (GOT MATH? 30,000 troops died in Korea under Truman in 3 years. 3,000 troops died in Iraq under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Got Milk?


62 posted on 11/11/2006 10:04:53 AM PST by Boiler Plate (Mom always said why be difficult, when with just a little more effort you can be impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem


72 posted on 11/12/2006 7:03:58 AM PST by bitt ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

If you get plenty of sun wouldn't you automatically get plenty of Vit D?

Yes!
But I go one step further!
VIBE brings you the most bio-available vitamin and mineral supplementation available on the planet today.The Physicians Desk Reference(PDR), states that supplementation in pill, powder and tablet form is only 3-10% absorbed at best.VIBE is listed in The Physicians Desk Reference (PDR)" I lost 50 lbs on the South Beach Diet, VIBE was the rest of the story.
http://www.liquidnutritionone.com/kemah/


91 posted on 11/13/2006 6:59:33 AM PST by BellStar (Whenever you hear that "world opinion" holds a view, assume it is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson