Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Al Qaeda Victory
Strategy Page ^ | November 9, 2006 | Harold C. Hutchison

Posted on 11/09/2006 3:49:13 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

One of the immediate things known in the wake of the American November elections is that the media strategy employed by al Qaeda has succeeded. Having failed to disrupt three elections in Iraq, al Qaeda and other terrorist groups fought to hang in there, and shifted their aim to American newsrooms.

It was a logical choice. In 1968, the Tet Offensive led many in the media to believe that the war in Vietnam was failing. The most famous pronouncement was Walter Cronkite's declaration that the war was a stalemate. Lost in the media defeatism was the fact that American and South Vietnamese troops won the battle, and had delivered a crippling blow to the Viet Cong. Similarly, in 1993, American forces won a firefight with Somalian militias under warlord Mohammed Farrah Aidid – but CNN footage of American casualties being dragged through the street led to a perception of defeat.

In this case, al Qaeda exploited what was already an inherent opposition to the war. Some mainstream media outlets had opposed the war from the start. The failure to immediately find weapons of mass destruction added to the media's growing doubts. As long as al Qaeda detonated IEDs in Iraq and Afghanistan, they could increase the perception of a quagmire. By getting the media to focus on the IED-of-the-day, al Qaeda was able to bury the good news (like the training of the Iraqi Army and reconstruction efforts), and was able to weather the loss of senior leaders like Abu Musab al Zarqawi.

The other factor going for them was the fact that members of the mainstream media generally were not sympathetic to the U.S. government. In the last year, media outlets revealed several intelligence programs – often spinning them in a manner that put the intelligence community and the military in a bad light. A reporter for Time magazine, who embedded with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, had his article completely rewritten by editors who felt his portrayal of American troops was too positive. The media did not even admit that documents, recovered during the liberation of Iraq, showing Saddam Hussein was pursuing nuclear weapons, until it could be spun in a manner that made the Department of Defense look bad. The media even started to refuse to publish letters from Department of Defense officials which challenged misreporting on the war. Heroes like Paul Ray Smith, who was awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously, were studiously ignored.

Now, the stage is set for al Qaeda to win a major victory. It was a simple matter of getting the American media to ignore the battlefield victories while accentuating al Qaeda's attacks. What could not be accomplished on the battlefield – an American retreat from Iraq – was instead achieved in American newsrooms.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cwii; inforwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
The MSM is not on our side. The Department of Defense Information Operations and Public Affairs communities are ham-strung by their Democrat overlords.

Who does domestic counter-psyops?

We do.

Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group

1 posted on 11/09/2006 3:49:15 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
It was a simple matter of getting the American media to ignore the battlefield victories while accentuating al Qaeda's attacks.

The Media were and are willing accomplices - they're weren't inveigled into it.

2 posted on 11/09/2006 3:51:38 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
A reporter for Time magazine, who embedded with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, had his article completely rewritten by editors who felt his portrayal of American troops was too positive.

I would love to know more about this.

3 posted on 11/09/2006 3:56:13 AM PST by Bahbah (Regev, Goldwasser and Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bookmark


4 posted on 11/09/2006 4:00:19 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
We have to keep up the Internet pajama assault on the old media. As soon as public opinion is free from their bias, we have a chance to do it all over again. Maybe Mike Pence can retool part of the machine.
5 posted on 11/09/2006 4:01:06 AM PST by Thebaddog (Labrador Retrievers are the dog's dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

That would be a good thing to have documented.


6 posted on 11/09/2006 4:01:57 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Army to Fake the News

That's what DefenseTech calls the Army's pitiful attempt to counter al Qaeda's psychological warfare.

7 posted on 11/09/2006 4:03:41 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Another Al Qaeda Victory in Iraq? Didn't the Left keep telling us that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 or Al Qaeda?
8 posted on 11/09/2006 4:21:48 AM PST by FDNYRHEROES (Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

When a foreign enemy can ally themselves with roughly half of the population, kill thousands of innocent citizens and have almost half of the population blame the government and few seen to care; when the border apparently is wide open and the President wants to give away citizenship to anyone who can break enough laws to get here; when the government wants to open a corridor right through the center of the country from Mexico to Canada; with all of this taking place, I wonder how close we are to a second civil war.


9 posted on 11/09/2006 4:34:33 AM PST by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I wonder how close we are to a second civil war.

Closer than you think.

10 posted on 11/09/2006 4:37:50 AM PST by TADSLOS (Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

I am so glad other people see this. It's disgusting and I truly believe that those in the so called MSM will eventually have to pay a price for their treasonous acts.


11 posted on 11/09/2006 4:38:17 AM PST by Cricket24 (ULTRA PATRIOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA; archy

In order for there to be a second American Civil War, one side would have to take a stand from which they would not back down.

If you remember the post-Waco, pre-Oklahoma City militia movement, the saner ones who didn't embarrass themselves too badly over Y2K are quietly getting ready for President Pelosi's Gun Control Act of 2008.

But their chances of success are slim. The TTP's that worked in Anbar will work in Montana, too.


12 posted on 11/09/2006 4:47:11 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

The worst part of this is how this election has dissed the troops. The only people willing to take on the enemy have been debased by the media misinformation campaign that has been going on since 9-11. Exposing them would be nice, but who in the media will report on themselves.
Based on Tuesday, I see a very divided nation, one side content to live their life in denial, the other side totally frustrated that their own people hate their country and allow leftists to misle them with words and fake pictures.


13 posted on 11/09/2006 4:57:40 AM PST by dforest (be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
This is what is referred to by some as "4th Generational Warfare". It is fought only as necessary on the battlefield. The real "war" is for the "will" of the opponents decision makers (and population). I can tell you for certain that the attacks on US forces in Iraq during the month of October were intended to inflict as many casualties as possible in an attempt to influence the US election. This was their strategic intention and they succeeded. The press and the Democrats were naive accomplices as both capitalized on the insurgent activity to achieve their own ends (sensational stories & political power).

When told by Col Harry Summers that the North Vietnamese/Viet Cong had never defeated by the US military on the battlefields of Vietnam, General Giap responded, "That is true, but also irrelevant".
14 posted on 11/09/2006 5:04:09 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

The biggest problem in the short run is that our troops in Iraq will be in very grave danger because some Iraqis will now turn on them to suck up to the terrorists. There is NO spin machine on the streets of Iraq. It is what it is in their eyes, and it aint good. Pray with me that I am wrong.


15 posted on 11/09/2006 5:05:23 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Millions of Democrat babies aborted in 1988 or earlier did not vote this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
The focal point of the war against Islamic fascism was Iraq. The jihadists were sending their fighters to Iraq, there to be killed in gratifying numbers by American and coalition troops. What was once American resolve is now American weakness. The people have listened to the politicians -- one group that wanted to finish the job, another that didn't -- and gave the nod to the quitters. Today America is weaker in the eyes of those who would destroy us. Not a cause for celebration.
16 posted on 11/09/2006 5:18:06 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Very well said, I know this and a whole lot of people out there know this. I thank you guys for what you are doing and appreciate it. Our media, so full of hate, have made a steady drumbeat to defeat our country and misinform the gullible into believing their spin. I voted Tuesday and I voted for American victory. No longer is it " your loss is our gain" the dummies reverse that " our loss is your gain", and the other countiies will "like us" more now


17 posted on 11/09/2006 5:28:25 AM PST by dforest (be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Thanks for your post
For a great article on Islime, go to:

yourarmstoisrael.org

select "a must read"
pick "Article 29" "The Final Endtime Beast"
copy and save for future reference.


18 posted on 11/09/2006 5:32:21 AM PST by Lewite (Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Cannoneer No. 4

If it’s any consolation, this is not the beginning of the end of Western civilization. It is the end of the beginning… of the end of Western civilization.

Three years ago, I wrote a screed called Tet II in which I predicted that American liberals would once again turn victory into defeat – this time in Iraq.

But Bush did not crack, and I found myself actually daring to hope that our Captain MacWhirr would, out of sheer unimaginative stubbornness, tame the coolies in the hold and outlast the typhoon.

Oddly, it was a storm that dashed that hope. Not a typhoon, but a hurricane. Katrina. The delayed result of those breached levies: we will soon enter the new Dark Ages.

I am not blaming this election. It is a result more than a cause. But there are irreversible moments in history, moments after which the toothpaste cannot ever be put back into the tube. We are in such a moment.

Bush seemed about to confront the crisis five years ago. But the war – not the war in Iraq, but the war here over Iraq – undermined his efforts and distracted him from the task. He must take some of the blame for that. Now, we have just elected the team least likely to tackle the job and instituted policy gridlock where we need urgent action. Looking back it was probably all inevitable. It is about who we are. Our failings as a people.

Let me assert a couple of simple facts. I will not try to prove them. They are self evident to reasonable people. Unreasonable people are not my audience, and no proof would suffice for them, anyway.

First assertion: In the modern world of porous borders, massively destructive and easily secreted weaponry, huge concentrations of exposed economic value and apocalyptic religious fundamentalism, preemption is the only viable strategy for combating an implacable terrorist enemy bent solely on destruction. The Maginot Line did not work in two dimensions; it certainly will not in four.

Second assertion, to misquote Captain Segura (Ernie Kovacs): “There are two classes of people: those who can be [terrorized] and those who can't”. Terrorism only works with the consent of the terrorized. If you refuse to be terrorized, terrorism does not work. If it does not work, it will, eventually, not happen. To allow it to work is to invite it to happen. The successfully terrorized victim serves as accomplice to the terrorist.

The Left invites terrorism. Partly because they are weak in the face of life’s adversities. Partly, here and now, because it suits their tactical political agendas. They are the coolies in the hold, rioting over gold – aboard a ship about to founder.

Our enemy knew that this sort of mutiny is the inescapable curse of the American psyche. That they could call and raise, again and again, in Iraq – backing an obviously losing hand. Inevitably, America would fold.

This knowledge emboldened them to launch, and then to persevere in their insurgency – which grew as the anti-war movement gained strength. And vice versa.

The Left, by sensitizing themselves and us to the terror, became an accomplice – a catalyst in the killing and maiming of thousands of American servicemen. The Left, in turn, directly benefited. The more they could make it appear that our policy in Iraq was “Bush’s failed policy” – even at the cost of causing it to fail – the better their political fortunes, as the election proved.

This is not about incrimination – although it does sound like it, I admit. It is too late for that now. And we can’t, ultimately, blame the Left and its chief weapon, the Media. The failure is ours, the American people’s. With popular sovereignty comes responsibility. We have been tested; and found wanting. Now we will face the consequences. And they will bring us, all of us, more than enough penance.

The impending crisis involves nukes. They are paradigm-shifting weapons that invalidate Segura’s Law. You can maintain a stiff upper lip to the occasional terror bombing, but stoical detachment cannot withstand nuclear attack.

If Iraq had succeeded, it might have aborted this future. Brought Western values to the Middle East and disarmed Iran and North Korea. But now, other radical States will actively seek nuclear technology. Iran will not be disarmed. North Korea will, eventually, dispense its weapons.

In a couple of years, we will have passed the point of no return. The toothpaste will be out of the tube. Terrorists will have nukes. And, inevitably, terrorists will use those nukes on us.

Bush’s strategy was preemption: to attach and destroy the terrorist in their homes before they could muster an attack. To eliminate the festering failed States that sustained them.

We will soon adopt a new course: we will “redeploy” out of Iraq – tail between our legs. And the terrorist will follow us home. The nuclear attacks will be random, unstoppable and devastating.

The British could ignore the destruction of the old Commercial Union Building in London a generation ago. America ultimately shrugged off the Twin Towers five years ago. But New York, Chicago, London, Paris… The loss of entire cities will cripple Western economies and traumatize all civilized peoples. We will be locked in an unwinable asymmetrical war of attrition: our landmark cities for their caves and mud-huts.

The only way to fight terrorism, if you cannot prevent the attacks, is to ignore the effects. – as the British tried to ignore the IRA bombings. The only way to ignore nuclear terrorism is to preemptively “redeploy out of the crosshairs. The great city is the emblem of Western Civilization. Within years they will die – abandoned or incinerated.

But the “redeployment” will not be fast enough, or thorough enough. When the strikes come, the toll will be staggering. A thousand fold or more what we have lost in Iraq. Or on 9/11. Then more millions will die of disease and famine.

The great things we have, as a civilization, built on the Earth over one thousand years will evaporate. We will be left, some of us, to scrape out our bitter existence amidst the ruble in what were the suburbs.

But at least the Left will have succeeded in one thing: eliminating the root cause of Islamic radicalism. The gulf that divides Christendom and the Caliphate. The gulf that energizes their hatred for us. For we and our works will have been laid low.

And then…. Who knows? One guess: dung beetles, muttering “Allah Akbar”, feasting on the remains of Western Civilization.


20 posted on 11/09/2006 5:44:49 AM PST by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson