Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bozell Blasts Biased Media Coverage: National Press Is 'A Laughingstock'
http://newsbusters.org/ ^ | November 8, 2006 | Greg Sheffield

Posted on 11/08/2006 5:10:09 PM PST by lowbridge

Bozell Blasts Biased Media Coverage: National Press Is 'A Laughingstock'

Posted by NB Staff on November 8, 2006 - 11:19.

MRC President Brent Bozell appeared with other conservative leaders at the National Press Club this morning to urge that the Republican Party respond to their election defeat by returning to their conservative Reaganite roots. During his remarks, Bozell lambasted the national media’s biased campaign coverage, blasting them as “a laughingstock when it comes to the idea of objective journalism.”

Video available (1:13): Real (2.0 MB) or Windows Media (2.3 MB), also MP3 audio (355 KB)

In the press conference televised live on C-SPAN, Bozell listed the missed opportunities and strategic errors made by the Republicans, then focused on the media’s hand in crafting yesterday’s outcome:

“And then they [the Republicans] had the problem with the national press. I will say this unequivocally: In 25 years of looking at the national media, I have never in my life seen a more one-sided, distorted, vicious presentation of news and non-news by the national press. The national press ought to be collectively ashamed of itself. They might as well take out membership in the Democratic national party, they were simply microphones for the party. They need to be ashamed of themselves for what they did.

“They are a laughingstock when it comes to the idea of objective journalism. They distorted the record time and again. A simple example: When gas prices went to near historic highs, the media couldn’t stop talking about what disastrous results Republican party policies were having. When gas prices plummeted, did the media give the Republican party any credit, or this administration? None whatsover. Instead, they advanced Lyndon LaRouche conspiracy theories about how Republicans were manipulating gas prices in order to get elected. Shame on the national press.”

Throughout the press conference, C-SPAN identified Bozell as the President of the Parents Television Council. While that is one of Bozell's jobs, he was appearing this morning as President of the Media Research Center and head of the Conservative Victory Committee. The Parents Television Council had nothing to do with today's event.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bozell; brainwash; brentbozell; hostilemedia; mediabias; msm; nationalpress
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2006 5:10:10 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Good thing the MSM will be just plain out of biz in ~ 5 years...!


2 posted on 11/08/2006 5:14:33 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Good thing the MSM will be just plain out of biz in ~ 5 years...!


3 posted on 11/08/2006 5:14:34 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
The national press ought to be collectively ashamed of itself.

But, they aren't. In fact they are as pleased as they can be with what they have accomplished. In their minds, they have brought about a change in both houses of Congress with their slanted and deceptive reporting.

I predict that they will become even more partisan and rapid. They will double and redouble their efforts. Who's to stop them?

4 posted on 11/08/2006 5:16:11 PM PST by centurion316 (Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida WorldwideA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I wouldn't call them a laughingstock, as it seems it worked. They have destroyed the republican party and given power back to the socialists which was the intent.


5 posted on 11/08/2006 5:16:21 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The media is a sorry bunch all right, but I dont see anything to laugh at. They just destroyed the efforts of 2500 dead, brave American fighting men and women.Not to mention Brits ,Canadians and Australians. Men who fought for this country and were sold down the river by the likes of the New York Times and the Washington Post. They may be a laughing stock ,but this American isnt laughing.


6 posted on 11/08/2006 5:16:59 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Evidently they got away with it.


7 posted on 11/08/2006 5:17:07 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The ratmedia is dying. It will be less powerful next cycle then it was this one.


8 posted on 11/08/2006 5:17:20 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (DON'T BELIEVE PESSIMISM: FEELINGS ARE FOR LOVE SONGS. FACTS ARE FOR PREDICTING WHO WINS IN NOV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Who's to stop them?

Their stockholders, unless they want to go bankrupt.

9 posted on 11/08/2006 5:17:36 PM PST by lowbridge (Got my own set of keys to the Rovian Weather and Earthquake Machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

True, but no laghingstock.

The media is undermining democracy, in which a "free" media is supposed to inform the public about ongoing politics and not BRAINWASH the public, like it was done behind the Iron Curtain.

Disgusting!


10 posted on 11/08/2006 5:18:01 PM PST by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
hey need to be ashamed of themselves for what they did.

They're too busy gloating about their victory.

11 posted on 11/08/2006 5:19:04 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The man's right. The media was dispicable. I actually don't care if the MSM is biased, so long as the're up front about it.


12 posted on 11/08/2006 5:19:12 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I doubt it. Dead horses stink as they do, but they rot slowly. The socialist MSM is rotting slowly.


13 posted on 11/08/2006 5:19:45 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Pray for the military. They are stuck in the middle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I agree with you, Sarge. Iraq would have long ago settled down without their constant rabble-rousing and support of the enemy. They have lots of blood on their hands. And, apparently they like it that way.


14 posted on 11/08/2006 5:19:49 PM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

This is what the RNC needs to hear. And do:

Lessons Learned
Over the course of my military career, I participated in more than a few "lessons learned" studies, analyzing what went right (or wrong) in a particular exercise or operation. With a nod toward Colin Powell's axiom that bad news doesn't improve with time (or distance from the event), most of my "lessons learned" reports that I authored were concise, fairly blunt documents, designed to convey key points, with little regard for personal or political sensitivities. That's one reason I never reached the senior ranks, but at least I was an honest broker of information. In the light of yesterday's GOP defeat, I think the party needs a similar "lessons learned" assessment, to be adopted or ignored at their own peril.

1. Beware of Conceptual Collapse (see my previous post). The Grand Old Party that got hammered yesterday was not the Republican Party of 1994, or the party that Ronald Reagan led to power in 1980. Those movements were codified around clear objectives that were easily understood--and embraced--by the electorate. Ronaldus Maximus was swept into office on three principles: downsize government, reduce the tax burden, and defeat communism. The Republican Revolution of 1994 was built on the Contract of America, principles that were eventually abandoned in a great flood of greed, cronyism and political triangulation. Sorry, but a guest worker amnesty program and prescription drugs for everyone simply don't wash for a party built on revolutionary ideas. Regaining power means a return to the values and principles that resonate with the party's core values, and the electorate.

2. Understand Today's Political Playing Field. David Horowitz has been a lone voice in articulating the reality of today's political environment that Republicans largely ignore. In a country that is roughly split 50/50, politics is truly a blood sport; give no quarter and take no prisoners. Think the DeLay and Foley "scandals" are mere happenstance, or (as the MSM would have you believe), evidence of a "culture of corruption?" In the case of DeLay, it was a carefully conceived political takedown, designed to eliminate one of the most effective GOP leaders in decades. Foley, of course, deserved to resign in shame. But it's worth remembering that some of his instant messages circulated for more than a year before they found their way to liberal operatives and their accomplices in the MSM. And naturally, they were released barely a month before the election, to inflict maximum damage on GOP candidates and the Republican base. If the GOP wants to compete in this no-holds-barred, bare knuckles environment, they better get better at opposition research, data mining, and the other tools perfected by the Democrats. If that sounds contrary to the "party of ideas" principle, remember this: it's hard to advance an intellectual argument if you opponent is successfully painting you as corrupt. At least three Democratic Congressmen are either under or facing indictment on serious criminal charges. Yet none were mentioned in national advertising. If I had a dollar for every time I heard "Mark Foley" or "Jack Abramhoff," during this election cycle, I could retire comfortably.

3. Quit Worrying About the MSM and Fully Engage the New Media. For some reasons, Republicans who spend more than a couple of days in D.C. become concerned about what the Washington Post or The New York Times thinks of them. Guess what, guys: they hate you. They really do. The Times didn't endorse a single Republican candidate this year (surprise, surprise), and the WaPo pulled out the stops to put its favorite Senate candidates (Ben Cardin in MD and Jim Webb in VA), over the top. That scenario isn't likely to change anytime soon, either. On the other hand, conservatives dominate the new media, but talk radio hosts weren't invited to the White House until late October. What took so long? Efforts to reach out to the conservative blogosphere were inconsistent at best, and another example of too little, too late. You can make the case that engaging talk radio and bloggers is an example of "preaching to the converted," but it's also an effective tool for energizing the base. Polling data from this year's campaign suggests that much of the GOP base was late in coming home; earlier, more persistent efforts among the new media might have energized conservative voters earlier, and saved some of those Congressional seats that turned blue on Tuesday.

4. Win the Damn War in Iraq. Many voters who voted for "change" yesterday expressed grave concerns about the War in Iraq. Small wonder, since Congressional Democrats and the MSM have been beating the "Iraq is a failure" drum for the past two years, and today, they got an early Christmas present with the resignation of Don Rumsfeld. As we've noted (in another post), Mr. Rumsfeld and the troops certainly deserved better. The best tribute for his service--and the unflinching courage and sacrifice of our military personnel--is to finish the job in Iraq, no matter what it takes. Unfortunately, the administration seems poised to adopt some form of the cut-and-run strategy. Rumsfeld's prospective replacement, former CIA Director Robert Gates, is a member of the Baker Commission, currently exploring "new options" for Iraq. Interestingly, polling data over the last month indicates that a majority of Americans would support more troops in Iraq. in order to win the war.

5. Get on the Right Side of Key Issues. And we're not talking about an increase in the minimum wage and the illegal alien guest worker program--two issues that Mr. Bush spoke about enthusiastically at today's press conference. An overwhelming majority of Americans favor border security as the first step in fixing immigration. There is also support for tax cuts, particularly when it increases revenues and decreases the deficit--something that the GOP failed to point out in the recent campaign. The same holds true for reducing federal spending. Whatever happened to proposals to get rid of the Department of Education and Commerce Department? And what about school vouchers, genuine social security reform and the Fair Tax? Talk about revolutionary issues. But sadly, few in the current generation of Republican leaders are willing to discuss--let alone propose--these needed reforms.

6. Start Softening Up the Democrats for '08. Borrow a page from the Clintonistas and start the perpetual campaign cycle. When those freshmen Democrats go along with another Pelosi scheme, run some attack ads in their local markets, and prime the pump for an uphill re-election battle. And as for Ms. Pelosi, she's got a few ethical skeletons in her closet. Time for a brave GOP back-bencher to demand an ethics investigation, and put some heat on her. The Dems made a point of targeting GOP leaders. Let them discover that payback's a bitch (again).

7. Start Recruiting Quality Candidates. As Hugh Hewitt (and others) have reminded us, the Dems have more vulnerable senators on the ballot in '08 than the GOP. Whoever is running the Republican Party needs to start recruiting quality candidates now. Let me offer a potential #1 draft choice: Louisiana Congressman Bobby Jindal, to run against Mary Landrieu. There's talk that Jindal may run against incumbent Governor Kathleen (Clueless) Blanco in 2007. Jindal is one of the brightest lights in the GOP, and I think he'd be the ideal choice to take out Mary Landrieu. A lesser candidate should be sufficient to defeat Blanco.

8. Remember Churchill's Advice: In Victory, Be magnanimous, in Defeat, Defiant!

http://formerspook.blogspot.com/


15 posted on 11/08/2006 5:20:34 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
They might as well take out membership in the Democratic national party.

Um, they already have. If any blogger in the NYC or DC metro areas ever has any free time on a weekday, they could have a lot of fun digging out copies of all the voter registrations for the various MSM reporters and anchors and posting them online.

16 posted on 11/08/2006 5:20:48 PM PST by Dont Mention the War (This tagline is false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

ithey will be out of business in 5 years ONLY if we turn off the TUBEs!!!!!!


17 posted on 11/08/2006 5:21:12 PM PST by pollywog (Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Today Rush said to just watch, now that the Dims are in charge, everything will be just wonderful with the world. The economy will be terrific, the WOT will be going great, all the crap they have been spewing will "overnight" be touted by the media as pure perfection.


18 posted on 11/08/2006 5:21:28 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

The GOP helped them. The Press was like that villain in the movies who is shooting at people, yelling "stand still!" In the movies, the people keep a-runnin'. Well in our case, the GOP actually froze in their tracks and took a bullet in the heart.


19 posted on 11/08/2006 5:22:16 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (Authoritarianism depends on lack of information. Totalitarianism depends on misinformation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: observer5

The media has always been like that. It's either a tool for the state, or against the state. The idea of an objective media is a joke. Hearst gets the last laugh over Ochs.


20 posted on 11/08/2006 5:23:36 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (Authoritarianism depends on lack of information. Totalitarianism depends on misinformation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson