Skip to comments.
NTSB: Wind blew Lidle plane off course
AP via Yahoo! ^
| 11/3/2006
| LESLIE MILLER
Posted on 11/03/2006 12:43:11 PM PST by Ready4Freddy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Ready4Freddy
cll: Lidle and his instructor regrettably failed to correct for said wind.
2
posted on
11/03/2006 12:44:26 PM PST
by
cll
(Wishing I was stuck in Iraq with our guys)
To: Ready4Freddy
Wind blew Lidle plane off courseCould also be - Wind blew Lidle little plane off course
3
posted on
11/03/2006 12:46:06 PM PST
by
llevrok
(How can you plant the seed of freedom by pulling out early?)
To: cll
Wind or not, the cause was pilot error.
What a shame.
4
posted on
11/03/2006 12:48:46 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
To: Ready4Freddy
I'm sorry for his family, but because you have enough money does not mean you should fly a plane.
5
posted on
11/03/2006 12:51:15 PM PST
by
Recon Dad
(Marine Spec Ops Dad)
To: Ready4Freddy
6
posted on
11/03/2006 12:53:41 PM PST
by
ml/nj
To: rottndog
Weather compounded with pilot error, actually.
7
posted on
11/03/2006 12:57:43 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: ml/nj
I remember your post, ml/nj, and assumed that they had contacted you! ;>)
8
posted on
11/03/2006 12:59:05 PM PST
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: Ready4Freddy
A light wind was cited by federal investigators Friday for blowing a small airplane carrying Yankees pitcher Cory Lidle off course and into a New York City high-rise on Oct. 11. Huh?! What happens during 'medium' to 'heavy' winds?
To: Spktyr; rottndog
I don't know about the civilian NTSB, but in military safety investigations the weather is never cited as the cause of a mishap. Failure to predict poor weather or to account for it is called human/pilot error.
10
posted on
11/03/2006 1:04:10 PM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil institutions.)
To: Ready4Freddy
If it were me, my flight instructor would have been older than 26.
11
posted on
11/03/2006 1:05:14 PM PST
by
Niteranger68
(Already voted absentee...straight Republican ticket...best choice on the menu.)
To: Jacquerie
Failure to predict poor weather or to account for it is called human/pilot error.
Exactly right. I keep wondering...why did he try to make a u-turn to the left (into the buildings), instead of to the right (towards the river)?
12
posted on
11/03/2006 1:07:18 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
To: Jacquerie
The FAA accepts a lower level of competency from civilian pilots, and they do cite weather as part-cause for accidents (like the microburst that slammed that Delta jet into the ground short of the runway at DFW a couple of decades back).
I agree, if this had been a military flight it would have been listed as pilot error.
13
posted on
11/03/2006 1:08:40 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Recon Dad
I'm sorry for his family, but because you have enough money does not mean you should fly a plane. In this case, he was doing what anyone else with cash and lack of PIC time should do, get an instructor.
The reality is, airplanes are easy to fly, and easier not to crash. But when your time is up, it is up.
14
posted on
11/03/2006 1:09:14 PM PST
by
Dead Dog
To: rottndog
Not sure, but as it was a prop plane, perhaps the pilot was attempting to turn with the engine's rotation so as to turn faster? Someone check which way that engine rotates...
15
posted on
11/03/2006 1:10:48 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: llevrok
Wind blows big planes around as well.....
16
posted on
11/03/2006 1:11:02 PM PST
by
nevergore
(“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
To: rottndog
Apparently standard procedure is to make a left turn--if the winds prevail out of the west (which would be their left flying up the river) it would make more sense to turn left. Plus, if they turned right, they'd end up over whatever land is on the east side of the river, and I think the edge of the river is the controlled airspace boundary.
Basically, they flew into a dead-end canyon and had to turn around, with the "dead end" being the entry to the controlled airspace around Laguardia. Lidle turned left from too far out over the middle of the river, probably one or both pilots realized the screwup when they saw the buildings looming up, yanked it too hard, stalled it, and recovered (the "wing bobble" some witnesses saw), but couldn't turn away from the building.
}:-)4
17
posted on
11/03/2006 1:14:00 PM PST
by
Moose4
(They caught me white and nerdy.)
To: Ready4Freddy
Very tragic for both families and those injured in the apartment house.
18
posted on
11/03/2006 1:16:49 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(JOHN F. KERRY, BETRAYING OUR TROOPS AGAIN)
To: Moose4
OK, that explains it. So the real problem was that they misjudged how close to the buildings they were when they started the turn and/or how much room the need to safely execute the turn. Maybe this is where the wind came in as a factor.
19
posted on
11/03/2006 1:18:17 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
To: Ready4Freddy
I don't believe it. This is just too stupid for any NTSB analysis. Light winds do NOT make airplanes fly into buildings.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson