Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford set to produce last Taurus
Associated Press ^ | By TOM KRISHER, AP Business Writer

Posted on 10/19/2006 10:56:56 AM PDT by floridareader1

DEARBORN, Mich. - Sometime next week, the assembly line at a Ford plant near Atlanta will come to a halt, signaling the end of a family sedan so revolutionary that its 1985 debut changed forever the way cars look, feel and drive. ADVERTISEMENT

Say goodbye to the Taurus.

After 21 years and sales of nearly 7 million cars, Ford Motor Co. is giving up on what some call the most influential automobile since Henry Ford's Model T. The Taurus is credited with moving America away from boxy V-8 powered gas-guzzling bedrooms-on-wheels to aerodynamic, more efficient cars with crisper handling.

To many, the Taurus' death was slow and painful as Ford in recent years abandoned the car that saved the company, focusing instead on high-profit trucks and sport utility vehicles.

"When that thing came out, it was a big deal," said Robert Thompson, professor of popular culture at Syracuse University. "It so much became kind of the template of what a modern car was going to look like."

The Taurus, so futuristic that critics called it a "jellybean" or a "flying potato," made its debut late in 1985, with 1979 gasoline shortages still fresh in consumers' minds. The U.S. economy was just pulling out of a downturn when the scalloped Taurus, initially equipped with V-6 and four-cylinder engines, hit showrooms. It was an immediate hit, with buyers snapping up more than 263,000 in 1986, its first full year on the market.

It became the best-selling car in America in 1992 with sales of nearly 410,000, unseating the Honda Accord just as Japanese imports were starting to take hold in the U.S., and it held the top spot for five straight years until it was supplanted by the Toyota Camry in 1997. Even near death in September, it remained Ford's top-selling car.

Ford also sold another 2 million Mercury Sables, the Taurus' nearly identical twin.

"It was really the last full-size American passenger sedan to dominate the segment," said Jim Sanfilippo, senior industry analyst for Bloomfield Hills-based Automotive Marketing Consultants Inc.

Ford was losing billions in the early 1980s when Taurus was just an idea. Philip Caldwell, chief executive at the time, challenged designers and engineers to come up with a radically different car that would return Ford to profitability.

"We were in terrible condition financially," recalled Jack Telnack, chief designer on the original Taurus who retired in 1998. "He said `Look, we need something really different, really new, that will kind of set the pace out there.'"

Nearly 1,000 people worked on the car, many coming from Ford's European operations. They had spotted a trend that U.S. buyers were moving away from big, cushy cars to better-handling European models, Telnack said.

Engineers met that trend with a stiffer suspension, and they also gave the car more interior room, firmer seats, better ergonomics and more trunk space, said Telnack.

The car also had a lot of new "surprise and delight" features including a cargo net to hold grocery bags in the trunk and rear-seat headrests and heat ducts, said Joel Pitcoff, the Taurus' marketing manager at the time.

It was a hit in market research tests, and sales beat expectations, said Sam Pack, owner of three Dallas-area Ford dealerships who took part in Taurus research.

The car's sales remained strong until it got a makeover in 1996. Although the second version sold well, it never matched the original's numbers.

Still, company officials said the Taurus restored Ford's reputation for quality.

Frank Ribezzo, a lawyer in North Smithfield, R.I., is selling a 1997 Taurus for $950 after running up 210,000 miles. It's his third Taurus, with the first two going over 220,000 miles.

Ribezzo said he buys them used because they don't cost much and, save for the transmissions, they're reliable.

"As far as used cars, their value just goes to hell in a handbasket in a couple of years. But they run," Ribezzo said.

In the late 1990s, the Taurus became symptomatic of Ford's current ills. The company focused on high-profit trucks and sport utility vehicles, leaving the car almost unchanged for 10 years with little advertising support. In the meantime, competitors had copied the Taurus and refined their models, and the Taurus eventually became solely a rental car and fleet vehicle.

"It didn't keep pace. That's the whole story in four words," said Pitcoff.

Ford, left with few desirable cars, was caught flat-footed this year when consumer tastes shifted away from trucks. Sales have dropped 8.6 percent through September, and the company lost $1.4 billion in the first half of the year.

"They put no money into that product for the last several years," Telnack said of the Taurus. "They just let it wither on the vine. It's criminal. The car had a great reputation, a good name. I don't understand what they were waiting for."

The lack of attention to the Taurus has angered workers at the assembly plant in Hapeville, Ga.

Earle Chafim, a 22-year electrician who repairs welding robots, said workers met company goals, yet Ford still decided to shutter the plant.

"The biggest part I hate is we got the No. 1-selling car in the company, we won so many awards for being No. 1, it's a shame. We're still outselling other cars, and we're not even taking orders anymore," he said.

Ray Daniels, a 33-year company veteran, blamed Ford for not updating the Taurus and keeping the name.

"If they'd kept the name, we'd still be here," he said.

Mark Fields, Ford's president of the Americas, said he, too, can't understand how the company strayed so far from the Taurus. He wasn't with Ford when those decisions were made, but said he knows well that Ford's 1980s turnaround was led by appealing products, something he's trying to duplicate now.

"We are very, very focused on what customers want," he said.

When the lights go out on the last Taurus in Hapeville next week, there won't be any ceremony.

"It's not a reason for celebration," said plant manager Dale Wishnousky, proudly adding that workers raised quality levels since Ford announced the plant closure. "There will certainly be tears shed. There's already been tears shed."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abigwhocares; car; cars; fomoco; ford; fordtaurus; mercury; taurus; transportation; truck; trucks; uaw; ungghhh; vehicle; vehicles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-258 next last
To: nascarnation

Are you saying the 300 is built in Mexico?


81 posted on 10/19/2006 11:41:43 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

In order to make the Vic sufficiently driveable, though, one must put truck shocks in the back and German Bilstein sport shocks in the front (also, Z-rated 45lb./in. tires).


82 posted on 10/19/2006 11:41:45 AM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Never owned a Taurus, but my 1998 Contour with a V-6 is going strong at 98,000+ miles. Only one problem with it and it was fixed under warranty. Great car.

I had a Contour too, I had nothing but problems with it.

83 posted on 10/19/2006 11:41:47 AM PDT by cpprfld (Who said accountants are boring?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The Five Hundred is a very nice and smooth ride, but it is boring and ugly!

Yep, ugly alright, kinda like the Buick Aztec, and some other horrible designs.

84 posted on 10/19/2006 11:42:35 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bennyjakobowski
Ford needs to build a car that would appeal to the homosexuals that they continually cater to. I'm certain an appropriate name for such a vehicle will soon surface.

"Hummer" is already taken.
How about: BM Cruiser?

85 posted on 10/19/2006 11:43:12 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

no but the hemi engines all come from the Saltillo plant


86 posted on 10/19/2006 11:45:39 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
the Buick Aztec

A car so hideous that everyone who looked at the designs threw up!

GM prettied it up and put it into production as the Pontiac Aztek.

The Five Hundred is not spectacularly ugly, but it is boring for a vehicle in that price range.

87 posted on 10/19/2006 11:46:18 AM PDT by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 120-134)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: floridareader1
One clue about an American car's quality is the constant need to change the car's name. Accord and Civic have been around almost forever, while names like Fairlane, Galaxey, Tempo, Mystique, Pinto, Fiesta, Granada, Monarch, Countour, Comet, Falcon, on and on have been changed to confuse the American public.

Yes, the Japanese take a model and constantly tweak it and tweak it, making it better. American car makers abandon models hoping to hit a home run with the next one, instead of working to improve their current models.

88 posted on 10/19/2006 11:47:46 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

I don't get just WHY American car manufacturers have so much trouble making decent small and mid-sized cars.


89 posted on 10/19/2006 11:48:35 AM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: floridareader1

I honestly had no idea that they were still making them. I had a 1992 Taurus Wagon and loved it.


90 posted on 10/19/2006 11:48:38 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
I bought a used (Avis) 1992 Taurus and drove it for 140,000 miles until the transmission died. I could never get the brakes to work right-- 200 miles after having the discs turned, the "pulsing" would come back into the brake pedal (warped discs?).

Swore I'd never buy another Ford product.

91 posted on 10/19/2006 11:48:59 AM PDT by Max in Utah (WWBFD? "What Would Ben Franklin Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

First On Race Day

And a modified and somewhat more civil version of one of yours is"

Friggen Ole Rebuilt Dodge


92 posted on 10/19/2006 11:49:23 AM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: floridareader1

Remember when Chevy tried to jump on the Taurus design bandwagon? They built something that looked like a giant watermelon on wheels. Think it might have been a Caprice.


93 posted on 10/19/2006 11:49:53 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The Fusion was designed to replace the Taurus. The Focus is the replacement for the Escord. The Five Hundred is a very nice and smooth ride, but it is boring and ugly!

My parents had a 500 way back when and it was boring and ugly too. Why Ford felt the urge to revive the brand I'll never know. It's not as if anyone had an emotional attachment to it from their childhood.

Now, why Chevy hasn't revived the Belair I'll never know.

94 posted on 10/19/2006 11:50:30 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: floridareader1

Part of the problem with the 02 Taurus I own is there seems to be an uneven distribution of weight (too much up front, and probably way too much when I get in it). Low profile tires look like they are squished up front when the car is empty - no matter how much air they have in them. Ignoring that, I like the way it drives and handles.


95 posted on 10/19/2006 11:51:15 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Chevy's answer to the Taurus was the Lumina, I believe. Another name that will go down in mediocrity.


Honey, I just bought a brand new Lumina!


96 posted on 10/19/2006 11:51:29 AM PDT by floridareader1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
"it's the car"

I like that one.

97 posted on 10/19/2006 11:51:57 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Man defiles a rock when he chips it with a tool. Ex 20:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
They built something that looked like a giant watermelon on wheels.

The GM engineers I worked with back in the day called it a "hippopatamus in a tutu"

98 posted on 10/19/2006 11:52:12 AM PDT by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 120-134)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: floridareader1
I am still driving a 1996 model I bought for the wife new, it has 198,658 miles on it as of today. I have had to replace the water pump and serpentine belt and tie rod ends but everything on it works and for the money it has been good transportation for me. I commute to downtown from the suburbs each day round trip of 41 miles and it is great on gas. No I don't work for Ford Motor Company, but this has been a good car.
99 posted on 10/19/2006 11:52:29 AM PDT by cav68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I honestly had no idea that they were still making them. I had a 1992 Taurus Wagon and loved it.

They've been exclusively rental fodder for years now. This was a dumb move, BTW. Anyone renting a Taurus in the last few years had had a bad experience and associates all Ford cars with this experience. An excellent way to repel potential new customers.

100 posted on 10/19/2006 11:52:43 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson