Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton's Latest Glow Job [Ann Coulter]
AnnCoulter.com ^ | October 11, 2006 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/11/2006 3:17:13 PM PDT by pogo101

With the Democrats' full-throated moralizing of late, I'm almost tempted to vote for them — although perhaps "full-throated" is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals. The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer to talk about anything other than national security.

Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes, raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration's 1994 "peace" deal with North Korea.

At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats' hypocritical grandstanding was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.

Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour, bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea — keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.

In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter — probably collect — who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: "Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud, and I've worked out a terrific deal. I'll give you the details later."

Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.

Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes — more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return, they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.

The famed "allies," whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea. Japan and South Korea — actual allies, unlike France and Germany — were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.

If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as "a resounding triumph."

At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape weapons inspections for five years would "preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next U.S. president's administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making."

And then on Oct. 17, 2002 — under a new administration, you'll note — The New York Times reported on the front page, so you couldn't have missed it: "Confronted by new American intelligence, North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years."

So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence, lest anyone ask, "Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?"

But by Richardson's lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil. He said, "When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy." This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann, not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel "that there's too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it's a cry for attention." If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan. But Richardson says Kim "psychologically feels he's been dissed, that he's not treated with respect."

Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers (and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes like the Clinton administration did.

As Richardson said, Kim "wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration."

To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in 1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.

When pressed by CNN's Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented the North Koreans from building nukes "for eight years" — i.e., right up until the day The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes "for the past several years."

Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce. In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action. Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; anncoulter; fauxsexscandal; kimiljong; markfoley; northkorea; presidentclinton; rewritinghistory; sexwhatsex; snowjob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Victoria Delsoul

Clinton is kind of like an STD, a gift that keeps on giving. If there were any justice, he would be behind bars.


41 posted on 10/11/2006 7:21:35 PM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Well I know nothing about STD, but I get the idea, hahaha.


42 posted on 10/11/2006 7:24:50 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Girls are more feisty than men!


43 posted on 10/11/2006 7:26:42 PM PDT by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

LOL, usually one of the first things I associate with Clinton, well, after his legacy in Manhattan.


44 posted on 10/11/2006 7:28:16 PM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Yes, the Rats will do or say anything to get political power back! Lowlifes!

Time for one of my favorite pictures from the Clinton years!

 

45 posted on 10/11/2006 7:30:15 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

At least Hannity and Colmes aired the Zucker political ad. That will only increase interest in the ad. all hail to the new media.


46 posted on 10/11/2006 7:31:14 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

LOL!!!


47 posted on 10/11/2006 7:33:51 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Yes!!! Way to go, Hit.


48 posted on 10/11/2006 7:34:30 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

More dancing from me, Rotflol.


49 posted on 10/11/2006 7:35:00 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Tango or samba?


50 posted on 10/11/2006 7:36:10 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

bump


51 posted on 10/11/2006 7:36:39 PM PDT by GOPJ (Zucker ad mocking democrats: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3GPc_yMCE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Paso doble, LOL.


52 posted on 10/11/2006 7:41:06 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
"Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished."

ROFLMAO! I love you, Ann. :)

53 posted on 10/11/2006 7:43:31 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Viva el paso doble!


54 posted on 10/11/2006 7:45:25 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Amazing at the efforts of some Dems to rewrite the history of 1990s NoKo- USA relations.

More amazing that people are ignorant and stupid enough to buy it. But what do you expect when they get all their news from the NY Slimes?

55 posted on 10/11/2006 7:46:10 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

I love how that shot clearly impressed David Zucker - it's parodied nicely in his great political ad!


56 posted on 10/11/2006 7:48:11 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored; All

I think it's that "just out of bed in the morning" look that gets to you. Amazingly, it works for me, every time!

My husband finds me totally irresistable with messy hair, "racoon eyes" from errant mascara and Morning Breath. Go figure, LOL!

And in this pix, Ann looks like she's actually eaten a full meal in the past week. Men ARE attracted to healthy, hearty women. You can look it up. Curves sell, Baby!


57 posted on 10/11/2006 7:52:53 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Yes, indeed.


58 posted on 10/11/2006 7:55:10 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

This is rare form even for Annie.


59 posted on 10/11/2006 7:55:57 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101; devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; george76; Boazo; Czar
RamBubba VS Osama


60 posted on 10/11/2006 7:56:44 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson