Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/04/2006 2:56:11 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blogblogginaway

Yeah, something is beginning to smell about Foley's Follies, making 3-day old fish smell like roses in comparison.

The MKJ theory:

The DUmmies, Kosomites, and other radical left 'Rats and their fellow travelers had this information on Foley for a a long time, and they attempted to let it ooze into the news with this absurd blog gambit, which all leads to the 'Rat attempt at their own lil 'October Surprise'.

The most disgusting part of this business, beyond Foley's perversions, is how the above 'Rats (whoever they may be, and may they soon be revealed) thought it more important to save up this information to exploit politically at the most opportune time for them, leaving minors at risk in the meantime.


2 posted on 10/04/2006 3:00:37 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Surprise surprise suprise....

(insert obligatory pic of Gomer)


3 posted on 10/04/2006 3:01:59 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

PJ, check this out.


4 posted on 10/04/2006 3:02:14 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Gee, the blog forced Foley to behave like a predatory scumbag? Wow.


5 posted on 10/04/2006 3:02:47 PM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
McCain calls for independent investigation

There were signs of concern among Republicans, as well. Sen. John McCain of Arizona called for a group of former senators and others to investigate how the House handled the affair.

"We need to move forward quickly and we need to reach conclusions and recommendations about who is responsible," McCain said during a campaign speech for Sen. Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island. "I think it needs to be addressed by people who are credible."

McPain isn't helping.......

6 posted on 10/04/2006 3:04:04 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

bookmark


7 posted on 10/04/2006 3:06:04 PM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly (I wouldn't vote for a RAT if my life depended on it. Come to think of it, my life does depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

When did the instant messages come into play?


9 posted on 10/04/2006 3:10:01 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Those that do not heed the warnings of history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Remember this paragraph from the column The new 'Republicans vote on Wednesday' game?

But the pretend-conservative act is being carried onto a whole new playing field, one that has become wildly influential over the past few years and one that does not stand to be instantly recognized as a fake. That playing field is the blogosphere, which is then used in conjunction with massive e-mailings to “spread the word” (as one e-mailer insisted I do to my readers/e-mail list) to other conservatives.

The concept is the same: the blog or e-mail claims, first, that the said writer has been a conservative for years and that they have “had it with Republicans.” They then point to an issue that conservatives would likely be upset about such as excessive spending, immigration, or the expansion of government. Their supposed rage over the issue has convinced them to either not show up to vote in 2006, or, in order to really show Republicans, vote for the Democrat instead.

The blogs and e-mails are convincing in their wording and could incite the sort of reaction that occurred following the Harriet Miers nomination to the Supreme Court. Of course, any liberal could read Free Republic and find out what’s irritating conservatives this week, grab a handful of phrases, and toss it on their “I’m a conservative but voting for a Democratic because of (insert issue here)” blog. After tossing in a few posts about the evils of Hillary Clinton and abortion, the blog is now being run by a bona-fide “conservative.” A few e-mails and link connections later, the message of conservatives voting against Republicans is spread.

The premise is that a blog is established in order to generate credibility, and then that credibility is used to attack Republicans. In this case, the blog was supposed to be for "concerned citizens" to report sexual predators. Then the smear appears on the blog, and the blog is then passed to the MSM as "news."

-PJ

11 posted on 10/04/2006 3:14:10 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Foley's behavior was bizarre and reprehensible. We don't need to defend what he did. Whether he actually attempted to have sexual contact with this or any other page, we don't know.


16 posted on 10/04/2006 4:19:56 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
It's obvious the Foley scandal, though based on real events, is a typical Democrat political operation. The news media knows this but don't care. By the time the whole scheme is unraveled and exposed the election will be over. Also, in the public's mind, Foley's behavior will negatively eclipse the Democrat sleazy tactics. If Foley had one decent fiber left in his whole body he would put a bullet in his head.
17 posted on 10/04/2006 4:22:19 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

We know this

What we don't know is the NAME of the owner of the blog


19 posted on 10/04/2006 4:30:23 PM PDT by Mo1 (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Mr. C4E suspected this some days ago. He is the smart one in the family. :)


27 posted on 10/04/2006 4:45:46 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

StopSexPredators.com is a phony blog obviously set up by Daily Kos, the later of which coordinated its planned pre-election assault 12 minutes after postings on the fake website (which had zero traffic up to that moment). ABC News and the DNC were clearly also in on this fraud.


33 posted on 10/04/2006 4:58:15 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

I don't think you can plagiarize Wikipedia.


36 posted on 10/04/2006 5:03:48 PM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Methinks the dems and fellow travellers have these things lined up like depth charges on the poop deck, ready to let go, one by one, at what they judge to be the right time.


44 posted on 10/04/2006 5:15:55 PM PDT by Erasmus (I invited Benoit Mandelbrot to the Shoreline Grill, but he never got there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Wonder who wrote the IMs and are they fake??

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


66 posted on 10/04/2006 5:55:55 PM PDT by bray (Voting for the Rats is a Deathwish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Check Google's cache of the website. If there is no cache, then it was probably backdated.


87 posted on 10/04/2006 6:44:05 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

ping


107 posted on 10/04/2006 8:24:34 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

read later


120 posted on 10/05/2006 12:59:42 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Here's interesting info on the radaronline.com itself, it's somewhat different from most other WHOIS profiles (notice it was "modified" just few months before Foley's IMs leak after 5 years in existence - ownership change? or putting a "Transfer-Lock"?, no IP, domain) :

Whois - Domain Information Lookup
Connecting to COM.whois-servers.net...
Connecting to whois.pairnic.com...

Integrity Multimedia Co. LLC
1101 W. Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60607
US

PhilB@radaronline.com
+1.3123372337

Domain Name: RADARONLINE.COM

Technical Contact:
Mike Martin
Onsite Technology Solutions
1555 Sherman Ave. #232
Evanston, IL 60201
US

Mike.Martin@onsite-ts.com
+1.6302908736

Administrative Contact:
Phil Birnbaum
Integrity Multimedia Co. LLC
1101 W. Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60607
US

PhilB@radaronline.com
+1.3123372337

Domain Name Servers:
NS1.PAIRNIC.COM
NS2.PAIRNIC.COM

Transfer-Lock Status: ENABLED

Created: June 12, 2001
Modified: June 13, 2006
Expires: June 12, 2007




...and more from another search




OrgName: pair Networks
OrgID: PAIR
Address: 2403 Sidney St
Address: Suite 510
City: Pittsburgh
StateProv: PA
PostalCode: 15232
Country: US

NetRange: 209.68.0.0 - 209.68.63.255
CIDR: 209.68.0.0/18
NetName: PAIRNET
NetHandle: NET-209-68-0-0-1
Parent: NET-209-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.PAIR.COM
NameServer: NS0.NS0.COM
Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
RegDate: 1997-04-15
Updated: 2001-06-14

RTechHandle: KM383-ARIN
RTechName: Martin, Kevin J.
RTechPhone: +1-412-381-7247
RTechEmail: sigma@pair.com

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE848-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse Handling
OrgAbusePhone: +1-412-381-7247
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@pair.com

OrgTechHandle: KM383-ARIN
OrgTechName: Martin, Kevin J.
OrgTechPhone: +1-412-381-7247
OrgTechEmail: sigma@pair.com

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-10-04 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.




Kevin J. Martin and Mike Martin could be related, or could be coincidence.

Hope it can help shed the light on this sordid matter... Pajamahadeens (sp?), you can take it from here.


138 posted on 10/05/2006 11:53:44 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson