Clinton rewrites history

Boston Herald ^ | 09/27/2006 | Boston Herald editorial staff

[A CA Guy]

For Bill Clinton, the best defense is always a good offense.

That’s the Clinton the nation saw Sunday, pointing his finger and reprimanding Fox News’ Chris Wallace for the crime of aggressively questioning the former president about his role in fighting terrorism and his failure to go after Osama bin Laden.

“They [the Bush administration] had eight months to try [and] they did not try. I got closer to killing him than anybody’s gotten since,” he said.

Perhaps someone should have reminded Clinton that “close” only counts in horseshoes. But that aside, a day later Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice attempted to set the record straight. So why the Clinton hissy-fit and why the attempt now to rewrite the sorry history of his own administration?

Well, perhaps Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) tipped her hand when she said, “I just think that my husband did a great job in demonstrating that Democrats are not going to take this.”

With the mid-year elections coming up, maybe the only defense for Dems is a good offense.

[Lazamataz]

His reaction has stunned even the liberals.

Clinton's unbridled anger has unnerved just about everyone.

[bert]

Clinton feels the cold, clammy hand of death. He is spending his last days trying to save his image.

When he dies the Rats will come from the wood work denouncing him.

[OESY]

[pleikumud]

The Clintonistas, Jackass Party, are frustrated that there have been no terrorist attacks in the U.S. since 9/11/01. They want Bush to fail in the war on terror, because they think that will help them win elections. Which means they want our troops to fail; they want our troops to be killed and wounded in Iraq and hope that the U.S. will leave Iraq in defeat. The Democrats, lead by the Clintonistas, are allies of the terrorists.

[K-oneTexas]

Good find. Although an old article, 2004, it states matters very well. Thankx.

[newcthem]

Unfortunately for "BJ" and the islamic "cultures" most Americans can recognize a lie, no matter how many times it is repeated, and more importantly they can spot a fake like BJ for what he truly is.

[Grampa Dave]

THE ABOVE MASS MURDER OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT AMERICANS WAS THE INHERITANCE/LEGACY OF 8 YEARS UNDER THE CLINTOONS.

[AFPhys]

Can they not hear themselves?! Time and again the Dems tell us how MAD they are at Bush, the Republican Congress, Rumsfeld, Fox News, etc. etc. etc.

For all their indignation, there's one glaring omission: they never express anger at the real enemies

Quotable Quote by TIMEOUT!!!

[A CA Guy]

I love that.

[A CA Guy]

That kinda sorta could have been Monica.

[Timeout]

Quotable Quote by TIMEOUT!!!

I just some Republican candidates would start saying the same thing!

[Timeout]

PS: Imagine the "oppo research".

Search out every instance when your Dem opponent denounced thugs who blow up civilians in Iraq, plot to blow up airliners, plant IED's to kill American soldiers, etc. etc.
When the search comes up empty, run an ad telling the audience you're going to show them every time that happened---then 20 seconds of dead air.

I'd love it.

[A CA Guy]

Hardly think it was limited to blue dresses. :)

[A CA Guy]

About 30% of America IMO are hard core government employees, unions or welfare folks and that is what makes up what is behind the Clintons and democrats.

They are reliant like slaves to that party for their life.

They can NOT accept any proof that does not jive with their politics for that reason IMO.

[A CA Guy]

I think that is almost a complete list.
You need to add (refused to take Osama Bin Laden twice when offered to him, causing 9/11, this war and a global Osama Bin Laden network) IMO.

[nopardons]

bttt

[A CA Guy]

Wall Street Journal had a good one as well, but nobody likes to mention he refused to take Osama Bin Laden.

[A CA Guy]

Passed that around earlier, it was a riot.

[A CA Guy]

It is more about information being buried by the press that dumbing down IMO.

[A CA Guy]

If Hillary said there was no reason to take Clinton on camera, that would be a keeper.

Seems he was offered several times to them after 1996.
That date is important because he declared war against our nation publicly and was active as a terrorist.

They didn't have to assassinate the bastard, but they sure could have taken him one of the times other nations wanted to turn him over.
Could there ever had been 9/11, the war or a global Laden network if they took him?