Posted on 09/25/2006 11:18:15 AM PDT by DocFarmer
Bill Clinton's Rage As He Angrily Defends His Handling Of Bin Laden: Did He Do Enough To Get Al-Qaeda?
http://www.vote.com/vote/60412193/
Yes: Bill Clinton said in an interview with Fox News' Chris Wallace, "I tried and I failed to get bin Laden. I regret it, but I did try and I did everything I thought I responsibly could." Blaming Clinton for failing to get Osama is a right-wing conspiracy!
NO: Fox News' Chris Wallace asked former President Bill Clinton a legitimate news question about bin Laden and Clinton freaked out. Its obvious from the attacks on the U.S. on September 11, 2001 that Bill Clinton did not do enough to kill or capture Osama!
(Excerpt) Read more at vote.com ...
I think Clinton is starting to learn that he isn't president anymore and more and more of the press won't kiss his butt anymore. Even with threats of Arkanside.
FLASHBACK (from article in 2004 about the Clintonistas nearly forgetting about Bin Laden and Al Qaeda when they submitted their final national security report to Congress in Dec. 2000):
"The final policy paper on national security that President Clinton submitted to Congress 45,000 words long makes no mention of al Qaeda and refers to Osama bin Laden by name just four times. The scarce references to bin Laden and his terror network undercut claims by former White House terrorism analyst Richard A. Clarke that the Clinton administration considered al Qaeda an "urgent" threat, while President Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, "ignored" it. The Clinton document, titled "A National Security Strategy for a Global Age," is dated December 2000 and is the final official assessment of national security policy and strategy by the Clinton team. The document is publicly available, though no U.S. media outlets have examined it in the context of Mr. Clarke's testimony and new book."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040406-121654-1495r.htm
bump
It's now 85/15. Start spreadin' the word, folks!
I wonder if he looked like that as he was getting a BJ?
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me and gordongekko909 if you want to be added or removed from the Freep this Poll! Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list)
Thanks for the ping!
ping all your lists to this please..
now down to 83/17..it's bein hit hard by the left..
ROTFLMAO!
No brainer
Done. Why do they need my email?
I think it's to register your vote (so you don't vote twice).
Pingaling!
This is a bullshit poll. Of course he didn't do enough to get Al-Qaeda. But the GOP wasn't clamoring that much for him to do more either. Nobody knew how dangerous they were back then. Let's give this a rest.
Well said, ES.
NO! (16,511) (83%)
No is winning and that means: NO! Fox News' Chris Wallace asked former President Bill Clinton a legitimate news question about bin Laden and Clinton freaked out. Its obvious from the attacks on the U.S. on September 11, 2001 that Bill Clinton did not do enough to kill or capture Osama!
Actually, I think the only person who REALLY believed how dangerous they were was Ollie North.
I haven't seen all of it, but I listened to Mark Levin today. He played several clips -- get your popcorn ready now so you don't miss any. Sounds like it was really entertaining watching ol' slick nigh to bursting blood vessels. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.