Posted on 09/21/2006 12:41:42 PM PDT by presidio9
All Americans between the ages of 13 and 64 should be routinely tested for HIV to help catch infections earlier and stop the spread of the deadly virus, federal health officials recommended Thursday.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says Americans should have an AIDS test during their annual doctor's visit, along with other procedures they might normally have, reported CBS News' Cami McCormick.
"We know that many HIV infected people seek health care and they don't get tested. And many people are not diagnosed until late in the course of their illness, when they're already sick with HIV-related conditions," said Dr. Timothy Mastro, acting director of the CDC's division of HIV/AIDS prevention.
"By identifying people earlier through a screening program, we'll allow them to access life-extending therapy, and also through prevention services, learn how to avoid transmitting HIV infection to others," he said.
The announcement was hailed by some HIV patient advocates and health policy experts. They said the guidelines could help end the stigma of HIV testing and lead to needed care for an estimated 250,000 Americans who do not yet know they have the disease.
"I think it's an incredible advance. I think it's courageous on the part of the CDC," said A. David Paltiel, a health policy expert at the Yale University School of Medicine.
The recommendations are not legally binding, but they influence what doctors do and what health insurance programs cover.
Some physicians groups predict the recommendations will be challenging to implement, involving time for testing, counseling and revising consent procedures.
And some doctors wonder if testing people beyond high-risk groups justifies the cost, reported McCormick.
"Are doctors going to do it? Probably not," said Dr. Larry Fields, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.
But the recommendations were endorsed by the American Medical Association, which urged physicians to comply.
"This is important public health strategy to stop the spread of HIV," Dr. Nancy Nielsen, a Buffalo, New York-based physician who sits on the AMA's governing board, said in a statement.
Previously, the CDC recommended routine testing for those at high risk for catching the virus, such as intravenous drug users and gay men, and for hospitals and certain other institutions serving areas where HIV is common. It also recommends testing for all pregnant women.
Under the new guidelines, patients would be tested for HIV as part of a standard battery of tests they receive when they go for urgent or emergency care, or even during a routine physical.
Patients would not get tested every year: Repeated, annual testing would only be recommended only for those at high risk.
There would be no consent form specifically for the HIV test; it would be covered in a clinic or hospital's standard care consent form. Patients would be allowed to decline the testing.
CDC officials have been working on revised recommendations for about three years, and sought input from more than 100 organizations, including doctors' associations and HIV patient advocacy groups. The CDC presented planned revisions at a scientific conference in February.
Since then, the CDC has strengthened language on informed consent to make sure that no one is tested without their knowledge, and emphasized the need for doctors to provide information on HIV tests and the meaning of positive and negative results.
I don't see how the testing will prevent any spread of the disease. They're presupposing that if a person knows s/he/s positive s/he will refrain. That's a big stretch of the imagination, in my book.
It has been up to this point!
The best way to stop the spread of AIDS in this country would be for gay men to stop acting like sluts.
I think I'll pass.
I guess you didn't see my post earlier today about a 50-yr-old man who had sex with a 14-year-old boy. The man was HIV positive and he knew it.
Day late and dollar short.
THe CDC USED to notify sexual partners anonymously if someone tested positive for any of a number of venereal diseases but AIDS has always been Politically Protected.
Children who've been molested by infected men are at risk but not a lot of other 13 year olds.
Why not just test for sodomistic tendencies and track marks on their arms.
If "everyone" is getting the test, the test may drop in price and tax subsidies to lower the cost (for gay males and everyone else) can be hidden in the federal budget.
Apparently they are not acting!
Ba DA Bing!
Agreed. I think Liberals actually encourage debauchery and hedonism because it keeps sheeple distracted so they can get and stay in office and tax and spend, tax and spend, the old in and out...
Condoms in school was not about pregnancy or disease. It was about winning the argument against "prudes" as to whether teens should be engaging in sex.
The sex positive agenda makes advances through incrementalism.
A couple of days ago there was a thread about a thirty something year old man who knew he was HIV postitive, but raped a five year old girl.
All part of the plan.
Liberals always tell people what they think they want to hear. Whether it makes sense or not. In this case it's "It wasn't your fault that you got AIDS." This is similiar to when they tell them "You are no different from the rest of us."
The nanny stater portion of them.
Not me.
My 13 year old is a virgin and prayerfully will remain that way through high school, college and until after the wedding reception. She doesn't need to be tested at this point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.