Had me worried for a moment.
Posted on 09/20/2006 6:06:39 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
Edited on 09/20/2006 6:54:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
The Free Republic keyword feature serves a valuable purpose, it alerts posters to topics that they are interested in and supplements those topics which aren't already listed as available topics.
1. Please do not add words like "and" and "the" to the keywords. And PLEASE do not add every word from your title to the keywords, that's just plain annoying.
2. Please do not use keywords to troll posters. The mods can see who adds keywords and you're only going to get yourself in trouble.
3. Please do not add keywords to bump old theads. The purpose of keywords is to alert posters to current threads about the topic they're interested in. Adding a keyword to a thread from 2003 defeats that purpose.
4. Keywords on troll threads are exempt unless they contain profanity or an obscenity.
5.We are aware of several posters who abuse the keyword feature and we would appreciate it if they would stop.
Thanks.
Thanks. I'll stop doing it.
Ping!
I don't mess with keywords.
hahahahahahahahaha
The vast majority of keywords I've added have been for the proper purpose: to index the thread in a helpful way. However, there have been a few times in the past... :)
I have no idea what this all means .
I guess it good that you're not Keyed up about this. :)
LOL --- I hate the spamming of keywords. Makes me MAD!
Of course, but that was not a serious thread.
I had it bookmarked just in case some new runaway bride story came along, and I could quickly refer to them. LOL
LOL! :)
Ok...I get it now.
Thank you, EveningStar -- I've already added my two cents to this thread. Additionally, I added the word "keyword" to the keywords. ;>
Had me worried for a moment.
Hope I don't get put in the clink.
Some of those threads posted by the sky-is-falling buy gold!housing bust! types are nigh on irresistable.
[EveningStar:] How about keywords that are snide remarks directed toward people who don't know how to use the search feature? One of my pet peaves is duplicate threads or un-needed threads (and yes, I've been guilty of this myself). I admit to using keywords like "searchbeforeposting" or "trysearching" or "doasearch". Is this OK?
[Admin Moderator:] No, that's not ok and we remove them when we 're alerted to them.
...unless, of course, the keywords are childishly attacking Freepers who are science-literate, in which case the double-standard kicks in, and absolutely nothing is done in response to insulting or trollish keywords -- the keywords are left in place, and no action is taken.
For example, last week I submitted an Abuse report that read in part:
Additionally, there's some keyword abuse on the thread: "EVOSWALKONFOURS" is a childish slur on anyone who accepts modern biology (gasp!), which includes a very large proportion of all Freepers, and "FAIRYTALEFORADULTS" is pointlessly insulting and provocative as well. Such keywords would be rightly removed from a religion thread, and equally have no place on a thread discussing a serious subject like science.The trollish/abusive keywords were allowed to stand by whoever was on Mod duty that day.This kind of behavior reflects very poorly on FreeRepublic, only gives ammunition to those who buy into the stereotype that conservatives are anti-science throwbacks, and also tends to make the undecideds cause to ponder whether there's something to the stereotypes after all.
I've got nothing against ongoing debates on this or any other topic, but keeping it on something resembling an adult level would help the goals of both FreeRepublic and conservatism in general. Looking like a conservative version of the DemocraticUnderground playground does our cause no good whatsoever.
Since then, additional abusive keywords have appeared on that thread, including the insult "EVOBOORS", the sarcastic "SKULLPIXPROVEIT", and the testifying "THEBIBLEISTRUTH" (on a thread ostensibly about science, not religion).
This is just the latest example in an ongoing pattern.
The moderation for the many years I've been on FreeRepublic has been mostly remarkably even-handed and fair, but in the past year or so there has been a very notable double standard in place. I don't know if it's a result of a shift in policy, or the work of a single moderator following his/her own agenda, but it has had a chilling effect on the forum lately, has driven away many valuable longtime contributors, and has shifted the forum from a free exchange of conservative views to a place where those with certain views are allowed unbelievable amounts of leeway, while those with differing views are sent constant signals that "their kind" is less than welcome and will not be afforded the same considerations as the Annointed.
This kind of "doctrinal purity test" is not good for either FreeRepublic, nor conservatism.
Oh, how can you refer to those two darling fishies as chum?
LOL
I don't care for homophobic keywords either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.