Posted on 09/10/2006 7:04:53 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion
I didn't know if there was a west coast version of this thread. It didn't make sense to post on a show that was almost over on the East Coast.
***The last 20 minutes they seem to be doing a "news" program countermanding EVERYTHING they just showed in the movie.***
To the Dems, political power is more important than national security.
OK that sounds about right.
. . .LOL. though that would make for 'fast work' on Sandy Burglar.
What this movie does not 'say'. ..articulate' is conveyed through it's cinema photography. . .fast background; mixing of voices. ..music. . .'foreign' sounds.. All contributing to an extremely nervous landscape.
That alone should shake - and wake-up some Demrats or that supposed 'majority' they like to reference, who are now claimed as 'disaffected' by our WOT; if the clear message here, does not.
Thankfully that flashback clip of Monica wasn't the "beret scene", but just hearing that famous "I did not have..." lie by WJC discredited the Bubba Administration all over again. Sweet!
Just think of the impact a production like this might have had if it had been aired 2 years ago, in Sept. 2004 - right in the face of "Mr. Purple Heart".
Yes,
I can't believe some of the scenes. Though the storyline is difficult to follow.
I got a telephone call, missed a few minutes.
didn't feel like I missed a line.
That would have been asking too much of ABC. I can't believe their airing this!
Yup. Me too, up here in Boston.
Sucks.
1 hour and ~ 50 minutes into it here. They DID cut the very significant scene out of the first scene in the clips provided by redstate.com with Sandy Burglar that made him and Clinton look so cowardly.
And some of the second redstate clip is now gone from the broadcast version.... Although nothing really significant from that. The good scene with Patricia blaming the suits for the embassy bombings is still there.
their = they're
OK, THAT'S IT!
After watching this, there's absolutely ONLY one single person taht I'm voting for Prez in 2008.
Someone I know would have the COJONES (yes Madeline, I said "COJONES") to take OUT anyone that's endengering our country, and would protect us in this terror war WITHOUT ANY EQUIVOCATION or 'political correctness' litmus test.....
.......RUDY GIULIANI
and I don't care about this 'abortion issue' crap (YES, I'M PRO-LIFE), because if our daughters and wives are targets of these devils, facing the same potential fate as our fellow citizens did that Sep 11th, then we don't need to worry about them risking any births to abort.
It's just starting here on the West Coast
I had the net feeds until they started local channels here about 18 months ago...
Others must have downloaded it, or put it on YouTube by now, I hope. I need to figure out how to download embedded videos.
What you Said!!
Its a good and interesting question. The Geneva convention was designed for countries at war. Terrorism is war without borders, more or less, or at least thats what the terrorists hoped, (to hide in the shadows). Pres. Bush declared any nation harboring or supporting them is at war with us, so that nixes the idea. Still, legally, it is a different kind of war and I agree that new laws probably are needed to deal with the issues.
Personally, I'd like the CIA to be able to just fill them with lead. When you are dealing with roaches you don't respect them, you just step on them. Roaches don't deserve the respect of law.
.......RUDY GIULIANI
LibFreeUSA, I totally agree with you. I am also Pro-Life and Pro-gun rights but we are in the fight of your lives.
ARE THERE ANY MEN LEFT IN WASHINGTON?
THIS MADE ME ANGRY, WTH WERE THEY DOING? INSTEAD OF FIGHTING EACHOTHER MAYBE THEY SHOULD RECOGNIZE THE ENEMY.
GOD SAVE THE USA, BECAUSE THE PEOPLE IN D.C WILL NOT.
Loacal channel in san Diego is pre-empting The path to 9/11 tomorrow night for Chargers football. Why do I find that a little sickening?
Anyway, was the "edit" to Clintonize "Pathway" pretty lame or did it cut a lot out. From the comments here it seems like it was a pretty weak edit and the liberals won't be happy at all with it. Though we haven't seen Monday night yet and I bet that part received no edits and will receive none and if it goes out of its way to skewer Bush, no lib will care at all, of course. Any impressions as to what this first part is like and how it is on the BS-ometer? Accurate, or liberal white-wash to protect the Clinton Administration? I'm looking forward to Rush and hearing what he thinks, since he saw the first part, "Pre-clintonization".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.