Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speaking of 'Nuts': Agenda 21, in a nutshell
Klamath Bucket Brigade ^ | September 2, 2006 | Jim Kirwan

Posted on 09/08/2006 11:55:01 AM PDT by Issaquahking

While this new world of corporate governance/ lobbyists/ privatization of the commons etc; seems difficult to understand (disguised as it is with buzz words – and meaningless jibberish), it’s really not as complex as one might think. After you learn how to ignore the superficial banalities, and get to the meat (if there is any) of the message being given. Most times you’ll hear just fluff and nutter talk – sounds important but isn’t.

While we naturally focus upon local issues and concerns such as community development, roads, tons of garbage, forest access, tourism, sportsmen’s rights, lack of snow, no color in foliage etc, one does need to understand the “whys” of local political decisions, and the decisions of local commissions, boards, councils, etc. There is rhyme and reason to our loss of rights, land, privacy, and public opinion.

Every American citizen, no matter where you live, must buy your county’s Plat Book. Plat Books are maps that identify the owners of each and every parcel of land in your counties. You cannot know what is going on behind the scenes unless you buy your county Plat Book.

You will then discover that most of the land in your counties is now owned by 1) state or federal government, 2) land development companies, 3) land ‘trusts’ or ‘land funds, 4) environmental organizations, and 5) large corporations.

If you are lucky enough to have several Plat Books covering a 2, 3, 5, or 10 year period (Plat Books are published annually), you will see a connection between land trusts, land development companies, land funds, and corporations. You will discover that they buy and sell to each other, and that they change the names of their organizations, and also create spin – off organizations, on a regular basis.

Then, if you go to the websites of these organizations, you will discover that they are ‘partnered” with 1) each other, 2) with larger global corporations, and 3) with environmental organizations.

In other words, you will find that the buying and selling of land in your counties is a highly organized business bureaucracy that circulates perpetuates “profit and control” between revolving door “partnerships.”

But what are “partnerships?” In a word, “business” has changed in the United States. On TV commercials, I’m sure you’ve heard the term “partners’ – and certainly in your communities you’ve heard the lofty terminology of “public – private partnerships”. It sounds nice – like cooperative business ventures for the GOOD of the public. However – this is a lie, sorry.

Partnerships, stakeholding, and NGOs (non – governmental organizations) are America’s ( and the world’s) new governmental bureaucracy system. This system is the brainstorm of the United Nations and was defined in a document called Agenda 21, which means Agenda for the 21st Century.

Agenda 21, in a nutshell, mandated that all countries that were U.N. members implement Agenda 21 requirements into their nations and governmental structures. The U.S. is a member of the U.N. and therefore we were required to implement Agenda 21.

People – mostly because they never do any research on their own, but buy everything they hear, (because it sounds good), get confused over the different language – or mostly they, shrug, and don’t care. In the U.S. (to confuse people) Agenda 21 is called by different names. We call it ‘sustainable development’, ‘sustainable communities’ (New Orleans and Mississippi have this planned now that the po’ folks are gone), ‘Local 21’, ‘Smart Growth’ and a whole bevy of other names. However all of these governmentally imposed programs and changes that we now see in our communities (world wide if you read) are upon the insistence of the U.N. as outlined in the Agenda 21 document.

First and foremost, Agenda 21 mandated there is to be NO ownership of private property (exceptions for elites) – worldwide. Maurice Strong of U.N. fame owns a whole valley sitting on a huge aquifer – Ted Turner owns the most land west of the Mississippi – you won’t, ha, see them sharing!!! The U.N. believes that all land, watershed systems, and natural resources (water) must be owned and administered by ‘government’. To American people (remember duck and cover) this is what we consider to be Communism. We believe (or did) that ownership of property is directly tied to freedom.

As the United Stats set up and is the primary financial supporter of the U.N., the U.N. had to come up with a plan to make palatable their right to confiscate our privately owned land. But how did they accomplish that plan? Masterfully, the UN, with their partners ( the World Bank, the World Trade Organizations, and the International Monetary Fund, and global corporations and groups), began funding ‘environmental’ science organizations and universities with grant dollars. By doing so, they also formed “partnerships” with eco –organizations and scientists, and a master plan evolved.

Under the direction of Agenda 21, a massive funding web of partnerships, stakeholders, and NGOs, a ‘grant – hired’ eco-doomsday scenario was created ( sounds like Iron Mountain report, huh), and served to manipulate American people into 1) giving up their privately owned properties for the good of ‘sustainable’ nature and 2) to lay the groundwork for the ‘partnership – stakeholding – NGO bureaucracy. It worked (is working) like a charm. Anyone who questions this, giving up of one’s land, is called an ‘extremist’ et al, and since nobody wants to be thought goofy, loony, crazy, or against protecting creeks, birds, turtles, frogs etc; they learn to stay quiet (or they’ll have no friends and a forever empty dance card)! You have to be a good cow.

Once you buy your county Plat Books, you will clearly see that there is next to no property left to buy in the United States. It has already been purchased by state and federal government, land development companies, large corporations, land trusts like The Nature Conservancy, and land fund organizations – all of which are ‘partnered’ together in the greatest land and natural resource confiscation scheme in the history of the world. Watch and see – don’t take my word or thousands of pages of documents as proof!

In a nutshell, we are witnessing bureaucratic nation conquering. Rather than using warfare to collect new countries and landmasses, the partnership bureaucracy is collecting world territory (check it out – indigenous people being put off their land – for nature preserves etc) via land grabbing initiatives under the United Nations and its global partners.

These initiatives are operating in every town, village, rural and wilderness area in the U.S. Most people, including politicians/officials elected and appointed, vote yes on all this stuff, never looking beneath the surface. If you asked to discuss Agenda 21 with them, you’d get a blank stare. They hear all the lofty idealism, of protecting the land for generations to come – and BELIEVE it! It’s being protected alright – but not for the kids!

Equally, the professional sciences of ‘ecology’ and ‘conservation’ were bought by the Agenda 21 system, and are now solely funded by Agenda 21 ‘partners’ in land confiscation. Not discussed by our politicians (local or otherwise) is that treaties, Memorandums of Understanding, etc trump Constitutional Laws of the U.S. Treaties trump national (local – state) law. At the state level of government, our state governors, who hope to retain the financial support of the federal government, have also agreed to implement Agenda 21 into each and every one of our 50 states.

And now we come to our local levels of government, our local colleges and universities, and our local movers and shakers, which we well know are the affluent people who are our county commissioners, councilmen (well not affluent here) and businessmen. All the affluent locals (true), in efforts to gain dollars from their state governments, and to be privy to the endless money via international, federal, and state grants for “land” ventures, have signed onto the new “partnership – stakeholding – NGO” system of business, because that new bureaucracy is how wealth, power, and money works in our New Greedy World. In truth and fact, if you aren’t part of this new governmental bureaucracy, which includes grant money and non – profit status, you are 1) NOT going to succeed financially, and 2) you are never going to gain any political or local power ( good luck).

We are losing not only our private property, but our access rights to our wilderness areas, as well. It’s all dressed up in “love of nature and/or sustainability” language, but the facts remain the same. Private property is to end, and this is why, via your county Plat Books, you will see that there is literally next to no land left for us to buy in our country. This is why you are seeing “access restrictions” being imposed daily and all across our nation. This is why we are being herded into ‘planned communities’ where we do not own the land. Agenda 21 originally defined these planned communities as “human settlements”. How many land development companies are in your areas” How many deed – restricted communities have been erected?

Today’s ‘government’ is a combination corporate – financial system, with human beings as highly controlled servants to profit. We are highly ‘managed’ (and will be more so) creatures – much like chipped and reintroduced wolves and ‘invasive’ species. Consider why anyone in their right mind, much less entire governmental departments, would agree to implement programs like large carnivore reintroduction – thereby decimating deer and other ungulates and cattle populations, nationwide. Why? To force farmers/ranchers out of business and to sell their land, and to effectively end hunting (any thought of being self sustaining) and other outdoor wilderness sports. It’s called getting the people off the land – plain and simple.


Hear our politico's sing about it: here


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: agenda21; business; citizen; citizenship; conservation; constitution; control; corporate; cuespookymusic; development; environment; environmentalist; envirowhack; envirowhackos; esa; freedom; government; inholder; klamath; libertarians; mous; nature; nau; newworldodor; ngos; nwo; obl; outdoor; plat; property; recreation; rfe; rights; shareholder; stakeholder; sustainable; theft; tnc; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
While everyone does there everyday jobs, so to do the people whole are committing the biggest crimes. This is about how they are stealing from you! Reminds me of the frog in the pot...
1 posted on 09/08/2006 11:55:04 AM PDT by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

My thoughts exactly.


2 posted on 09/08/2006 11:58:16 AM PDT by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; SierraWasp; freepatriot32; glock rocks; redrock; Fred Nerks; sauropod; ...

Some of the usual suspects ping...


3 posted on 09/08/2006 12:02:34 PM PDT by Issaquahking (Trust can't be bought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abbi_normal_2; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
4 posted on 09/08/2006 12:08:07 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
5 posted on 09/08/2006 12:08:44 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

Why does this sound like it was written by Oliver Stone?


6 posted on 09/08/2006 12:09:52 PM PDT by Calvin Coollidge (The last really great president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; DaveLoneRanger; backhoe; GladesGuru

More usual suspects...ping


7 posted on 09/08/2006 12:10:47 PM PDT by Issaquahking (Trust can't be bought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Coollidge

Hey Cal, Your new here. I'd recommend you do some homework on the Klamath region for a start. Engage your mind, not your keyboard warrior skills.


8 posted on 09/08/2006 12:13:13 PM PDT by Issaquahking (Trust can't be bought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking
This is horse feces. Agenda21 hasn't mandated anything yet, because it's still not "hard" law. That may be the goal, but it's best we not get alarmist. Further, there's nothing wrong with privatizing many commons (such as ocean space), what IS wrong is corporate racketeering using the power of government to gain structural advantages over individuals (which are many).

I wish these folks would get a clue what they're fighting FOR. Public control of commons IS the process by which private property has been collectivized.

9 posted on 09/08/2006 12:23:52 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Angelides v. Schwarzenegger is like deciding between ebola and cancer, respectively.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Thanks for the ping.


10 posted on 09/08/2006 12:34:58 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

This is a very important post. Thanks.


11 posted on 09/08/2006 12:35:23 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

BTTT


12 posted on 09/08/2006 12:42:38 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking
I hate the UN and global gov't suppporters. but i have also searched for agenda 21 info in the past. I never find the wording that supports these claims though
like here
http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21toc.htm
though maybe i don't understand all the technical english mumbo jumbo
13 posted on 09/08/2006 12:48:10 PM PDT by freedom moose (has de cultivar el que sembres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
what IS wrong is corporate racketeering using the power of government to gain structural advantages over individuals (which are many).
valid point
14 posted on 09/08/2006 12:50:46 PM PDT by freedom moose (has de cultivar el que sembres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedom moose; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
what IS wrong is corporate racketeering using the power of government to gain structural advantages over individuals

That would be the Trans-Texas Corridor, and the Kansas City Smartport.
15 posted on 09/08/2006 12:57:30 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedom moose
I hate the UN and global gov't suppporters. but i have also searched for agenda 21 info in the past. I never find the wording that supports these claims though

I like to think of the UN as a useful vehicle for the conduct of highly organized crime. Agenda21 is simply a means.

As to good sources of information, I'd start with Sovereignty International.

16 posted on 09/08/2006 1:04:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Angelides v. Schwarzenegger is like deciding between ebola and cancer, respectively.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; ...

Cue Spooky Music...


17 posted on 09/08/2006 1:16:04 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; freedom moose

I suspect if Agenda 21 were actually being fully implemented as described in this article, there would be no massive infrastructure projects such as the Trans-Texas Corridor. It would go against such edicts as "preserving open space" and "protecting natural resources (for non-use?)."


18 posted on 09/08/2006 1:18:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I suspect if Agenda 21 were actually being fully implemented as described in this article, there would be no massive infrastructure projects such as the Trans-Texas Corridor. It would go against such edicts as "preserving open space" and "protecting natural resources (for non-use?)."
so my question is...does it really propose to do what this article says? i can't find that it does, but maybe i'm not looking in the right place
19 posted on 09/08/2006 1:22:02 PM PDT by freedom moose (has de cultivar el que sembres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freedom moose
so my question is...does it really propose to do what this article says? i can't find that it does, but maybe i'm not looking in the right place

I would hope not. Even the DNC is rightward of such a plan!

20 posted on 09/08/2006 1:23:54 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson