Posted on 08/25/2006 9:53:42 AM PDT by BJClinton
Ever since I announced my bid for the United States Presidency, Ive been questioned about some of my more radical political opinions. Most of those questions have dealt with my proposed economic policies for example, the abolition of the IRS and the implementation of the Fair Tax. Today, I offer an answer to questions about why I am opposed to the idea of gays adopting or teaching children.
Several years ago, I began writing columns questioning the so-called gay rights movement. I prefer to call it the gay privileges movement because gays are not presently deprived of anything that is rightfully theirs. A gay man has the same right I have to marry a woman. His waiver of that actual right does not allow him to substitute another right he deems more suitable to his needs.
At the time I decided to express such criticism of the gay agenda, I was not fully opposed to gay adoption. Nor was I absolutely opposed to hiring gay grammar school teachers. My criticism of the gay agenda was narrower than it is today and the tone of my criticism was far more subdued. That all changed when the homosexual rights crowd started to circulate some of my early columns.
Frequently, the criticism would come en masse from gay groups who would post my columns on PRIDE websites or chat rooms at universities like UNC-Greensboro, which is also known as UNC-Gonorrhea. They would work themselves into a fury over my well-reasoned essays and then respond with a flurry of obscenities unfit for reproduction in this column.
Before long, readers identifying themselves as gay were threatening to cut off my genitalia, burn my children, rape my wife, and, just to top it all off, kill me, too. Good thing these readers were all gay. Otherwise, they might not be so happy.
So, of course, I took the time to survey a number of other conservative columnists to find out where most of their profane and threatening hate mail comes from. The answer is always the same: Without hesitation, they all say it comes from the gay community.
Despite the volume and intensity of this gay vitriol, I have always refused to reciprocate with threats of violence or strings of profanity. Instead, I have relied on the far more powerful tool of heavy sarcasm. And that refusal to respond with profanity or violence has had a predictable effect on the gay activists. It has made them much less gay (less happy, that is) and also much more active.
One of their more recent stunts was to get together on a gay website to hatch a plan to destroy my marriage. Actually, they started their plan on one of the Transgendered websites. Since the Transgendered people are so angry, I suppose they are technically classified as gay, too.
The first step of their plan to destroy my marriage was to concoct a false story that I once committed adultery. For the record, I have never cheated on my wife. I did, however, attempt to cheat on my wife one time. Unfortunately, I couldnt get past Ms. Coulters bodyguard.
1 | 2 |
|
| | Full Article & Comments | | | Next > |
You'd think it was commons sense NOT to have homos as role models or near kids. GEESH!
Adams is great. His further point that there is nothing wrong with discriminating against people with a mental illness is right on. Crazy people can (perhaps) hold a lot of different jobs. Teaching children is not one of them.
Does anyone have a cite to the 11th Distric Court opinion regarding upholding the ban on homosexuals adopting children?
Hmmm,
Should schools be LEGALLY REQUIRED to disclose if their child is being exposed to homosexuals?
Who is this that has announced their bid for the U.S. Presidency?
Almost the same thing happened to me...fortunately, Ann's bodyguard stopped her from getting too close, while I told her, "sorry Ann...I can't accept your offers. Stay in touch, though...we can still be friends."
I have been reading Mike Adams for a couple of years...he is great!
...And now you realize why I am opposed to gays adopting or teaching our children.
Umm... because some of them made foul threats against you? Because they used to be considered mentally ill?
If I wrote essays opposing Judaism, or stating that black people should not be allowed to adopt white children, or that women aren't fit to serve on juries, I would most likely get some pretty vicious hate mail from Jewish, black and female readers, respectively. That wouldn't prove much, even though various authorities have stated in the past that Jews are evil, blacks are violent and women are hysterical.
You'll have to come up with a better argument than "because I've succeeded in pissing them off".
While what you said is technically correct, you're equivocating a religion, ethnicity and gender with where one wants to stick their willie. Hardly the same.
No.. you're using a fallacy of logic. His point had nothing to do with the level of mutability of the attributes involved. It also had nothing to do with whether being gay is just an "unhealthy fault."
His point was that the author makes no real arguments in favor of his position, except "because I've succeeded in pissing them off."
Whether or not you agree with his arguments, you can still call him on his stunted writing and juvenile reasoning.
For clarity.. in my first and second paragraphs the pronoun "his" refers to xenophiles, in the third it refers to the author of the column.
UNC-Greensboro is very gay. Literally something like 50% of the male students are homosexual.
However, if you're a straight young man, you can be ugly and dumb and still have a harem, since 70% of the student population is female. Even after accounting for lesbians, you've got about 4:1 odds. I used to know a smoking hot young lady from my hometown who went there who always complained about not having a boyfriend.
Freepmail DBeers, little jeremiah or scripter to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
No.. you're using a fallacy of logic. His point had nothing to do with the level of mutability of the attributes involved. It also had nothing to do with whether being gay is just an "unhealthy fault."
His point was that the author makes no real arguments in favor of his position, except "because I've succeeded in pissing them off."
Whether or not you agree with his arguments, you can still call him on his stunted writing and juvenile reasoning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.