Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's language angers US Muslims (Media BARF Alert !)
BBC ^ | August 12, 2006 | Richard Allen Greene

Posted on 08/12/2006 12:13:39 PM PDT by sergey1973

In the days after the horror of the 11 September attacks, President George W Bush made a point of saying Muslims per se were not America's enemy.

But in the five years since then, he has taken less care to emphasise that message, US Muslim leaders are saying.

They are upset about his use of terms like "Islamic fascists", which he used this week both for Hezbollah and the suspected bomb plotters held in the UK.

"It offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims," Ahmed Younis said.

"The use of the term casts a shadow upon Islam and bolsters the argument that there is a clash of civilisations between Islam and the West," Mr Younis, the national director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (Mpac), told the BBC.

He said it was wrong to link the actions of violent Muslims to their religion.

"There is nothing Islamic about their fascism. The Prophet [Muhammad] and the Koran clearly articulate that this type of activity is outside of bounds for Muslims."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: barf; barfalert; bush; crushislam; globaljihad; gwot; islam; islamicfascism; islamicnazis; islamicnazism; islamicterrorism; islamisadeathcult; islamisevil; islamonazism; jihad; jihadinamerica; koranimals; londonairlineplot; muhammadminions; muslim; muslims; propaganda; religionofpeace; rop; terror; terrorism; trop; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: 3catsanadog
It's time WE shame the silent Muslim majority minority.

There. I fixed it!

81 posted on 08/12/2006 3:00:42 PM PDT by Gritty (The irrational 10% of the Western mind is a lot scarier than what Islamics have to offer-VD Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mylife

You're kidding I hope.


82 posted on 08/12/2006 3:06:55 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

Nawp
L0L


83 posted on 08/12/2006 3:08:26 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: mylife

This country is INSANE ! totally INSANE !


84 posted on 08/12/2006 3:10:39 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973
When "moderate" Muslims begin to police their own, then perhaps we can "tone down" our rhetoric.
85 posted on 08/12/2006 3:24:33 PM PDT by Heartland Mom (My heroes have always been cowboys / Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"The use of the term casts a shadow upon Islam"

Oh, yeah? What about the shadow the terrorists' actions casts upon Islam?

86 posted on 08/12/2006 3:26:32 PM PDT by Heartland Mom (My heroes have always been cowboys / Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973

I wonder if muslims care what angers me. Like their silence in the face of monsterous attrocities, like their continuing protests against the countries they have emmigrated to, like their clandestine financial support of known terrorist groups, like their pompous posturing as "moderates." What in heaven's name is a "moderate?" Is that a muslim who would kill you if only he had a gun? Time is fast approaching when Western countries will have to call a spade a spade and send all muslims packing!


87 posted on 08/12/2006 3:32:11 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proudly Republican


I don'[t know that Islam is verifiably much different.


88 posted on 08/12/2006 4:07:41 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: maica

We need to tell them that we are offended when people who are using rusty butcher knives, and videotaping their actions, are calling out the name of Allah as they saw off heads, or as they blow up people gathered for weddings and funerals.

&&&
I am currently reading a very interesting book that reveals a lot about the mindset of these individuals, including Muslim spokesmen in the US. It is called "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam". Very enlightening.


89 posted on 08/12/2006 4:23:00 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973
They are upset about his use of terms like "Islamic fascists", which he used this week both for Hezbollah and the suspected bomb plotters held in the UK.

That is who they are! Islamic fascists! So there!

90 posted on 08/12/2006 4:25:01 PM PDT by ladyinred (Thank God the Brits don't have a New York Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973
"It offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims," Ahmed Younis said.

There are NO Moderate Muslims...

There are those on Jihad, and those who apoligize for or support them...

Semper Fi

91 posted on 08/12/2006 4:42:05 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973
LOL.....I wonder what they'd say about MY language......which cannot be repeated here.....
92 posted on 08/12/2006 4:47:06 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( The Dems are so far to the left they have left America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

I saw an advert for that book. I will look for it. We all need to get our talking points sharpened. I still remember "it's not your father's democrat party!" Very pithy!


93 posted on 08/12/2006 5:02:52 PM PDT by maica (Creating human shields is a war crime. It is also a Hezbollah specialty.-- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: river rat

Ask the real combat troops serving now what they think of Arabs?


94 posted on 08/12/2006 6:32:09 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973
They are upset about his use of terms like "Islamic fascists", which he used this week both for Hezbollah and the suspected bomb plotters held in the UK.

It's not Bush's fault that the terrorists don't have a common national identity like the Irish Republican Army or the Basque separatists..

If the enemy were only from Pakistan, Bush could say "Pakistani fascists." It the enemy were only from Egypt, Bush could say, "Egyto-fascists." Since the Islamo-fascist terrorists chose to co-operate with their fellow radical Islamic terrorists from other nations, they'll have to live (and die) with the broader labeling.

95 posted on 08/12/2006 6:35:44 PM PDT by syriacus (A vote 4 Lamont is a vote 4 the right of abusive men to kill women + children, here + abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973

This is serious. You know what angry muslims do.


96 posted on 08/12/2006 6:45:54 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

What is wrong with the Blackwater employees?


97 posted on 08/12/2006 11:15:13 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

Did I state anything that was "wrong" about them? Just being accurate as to who these unfortunate guys were. We owe that to them at least.


98 posted on 08/13/2006 7:39:24 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

NOPE. You said nothing. Those serving with them have some choice words.


99 posted on 08/13/2006 7:56:43 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: maica

I still remember "it's not your father's democrat party!"

**
You talking about the good ol' days outside the WH in 2000?


100 posted on 08/13/2006 10:45:00 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson