Posted on 07/30/2006 4:15:51 PM PDT by spyone
TEHRAN (AP)--Iran's president on Sunday said the crisis in Lebanon has forced Tehran to re-evaluate a Western nuclear incentives package, but his country still plans to respond to the offer next month. "Events in Lebanon affected our evaluations about...(the) package of incentives. We should review it carefully. I have asked my colleagues to review it more carefully," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said during a news conference. Earlier Sunday, Iran's foreign ministry warned that Tehran would abandon the package if the U.N. Security Council approves a resolution against Iran on Monday. "If any resolution is issued against Iran tomorrow, the package would be left off the agenda by Iran," Hamid Reza Asefi told reporters. "We will definitely revise our nuclear policy." Asefi's comments were the first official Iranian response to a draft resolution giving it until the end of August to suspend uranium enrichment or face the threat of international sanctions. The draft was formally circulated to the full 15-member U.N. Security Council late Friday and observers said it would likely be adopted in the next week. Asefi referred to the ongoing Israeli-Hezbollah war and said that any Security Council action against Iran "will confront the region with more tension," he said. In a commentary Sunday, state-run radio called on Europe to exercise restraint. "Under the international regulations, Iran has the right of achieving peaceful nuclear technology," the broadcast said.
(Excerpt) Read more at easybourse.com ...
Love your photo but the truth does hurt!
This is what is called the old dopefiend move, start the war and then say because of it things have changed bla bla bla
According to Tom Friedman on this mornings Meet the Press, it's all the fault of Bush, Cheney and Rice. If only Bush would export optimism instead of dark-side fear, if only he would talk more instead of threatening and using violence...
You get the idea...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1674572/posts?page=459#459
We're not in a war against one country. We are in a war against Islamic Fascism.
And in this case, Israel is on "our" side.
Together *with* Israel we will fight this evil. While "Israel" may not be worth dying for, civilization is worth dying for if anything is worth dying for. We can't stay out of this fight.
Ya think Iran has stopped development of their Nukes during all this DIPLOMACY???
LOL!~}
I still wouldn't trust them
I agree. Let us get a congressional declaration of war.
Thanks for your "Already Posted" comment, but many of us missed that story and we thank this poster for putting up this story.
In fact, over 1500 people have read spyone's story.
But only 49 people saw the story on your link.
That should tell you something.
That would be good. Definitely.
Actually, Michiganer and Snowsislander where extremely helpful in me reposting this after the first one was deleted due to copyright issues...they weren't cutting my grass, but rather good freeper friends, and I appreciate it.
What it means is that the United States will go ahead in introducing a U.N. Security Council Resolution that will call for sanctions to be put on Iran if they don't suspend uranium enrichment by the end of August.
The Iranians had the option, potentially, of accepting the package by now and avoiding the sanctions resolution, or of at least responding to the proposal in a timely fashion and thereby delaying the resolution.
So, what's happened, is that be delaying their response, the Iranians will ensure (Russian and China are reportedly finally on board) that the sanctions resolution will go on the books, and that the sanctions will actually be applied (hopefully not too watered down to appease Russia and China) unless they stand down on the nukes.
The mark in every con game has a streak of dishonesty, trying to get something for nothing. Our State Department appears to be a mark.
I think they are going to announce that they ahve reconsidered....
and decided that Israel is a terrorist nation and a threat...therefore- their nuke programs are no longer for energy- but for weapons....
and what would the UN do?
Issue a memo?
Oh for PETE's SAKE!
is there anyone left in leadership with brains AND balls!?
I believe this would significantly improve our strategic position in the War on Terror.
We should destroy the Iranian oil industry. By Bombing all oil transportation facilities, pipelines, storage tanks, tanker trucks, refinerys etc
we can cripple the funding of numerous terrorist organizations, Hezbollah, Hamas, Sadrs militia, Syria, as well as make it more difficult for Iran to buy missiles and such from North Korea, China, and Russia.
It would remove Irans threat that if we attack they will shut off the oil. Making the threat ridiculous and demonstrating that they are a single product state and without oil, and no other product that the world wants, they are nothing. Additionally, by declaring that we will destroy any reconstituting oil industry as long as the Mullacracy remains in charge, we can focus the Iranians blame for the situation, on the Theocracy and their support of Terrorism.
This will also bring home to all the other oil producing countries like Venezuela, Libya, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, etc
that they are very vulnerable to the same tactic.
In addition, this will gain us time for the Iraqis to stand on their own, and free up troops we would need if we have to go into Iran, North Korea or somewhere else.
Sure the price of gas will rise, but this will also demonstrate to the world that the USA is not in Iraq for the Oil, and the onus can be shifted on to the Democrats for not allowing more domestic production.
Its not the control of the spice but the power to destroy the spice that is the real power.
It has recently been said that the nuclear production facilities in Iran are so deep underground that we cant reach them with conventional weapons. Perhaps so, but maybe we can starve those facilities of funds. Nuclear weapons are terribly expensive to build, and if Iran now needs all its money to repair vital life supporting infrastructure, it may have to slow or stop its attempt to build an atomic bomb.
Finally, Iran is a state sponsor of Terrorists, it must be punished, and it must be seen to be punished. Irans continued sponsorship of terror is a slap in Americas and President Bushs face, and it must be answered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.