Skip to comments.
Election 'Slur' Stir [Another Reason Why Jews Should Not Be Democrats]
New York Post ^
| July 10, 2006
| Andrea Peyser
Posted on 07/10/2006 12:01:25 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
One important omission in the article: All the candidates are Democrats opposing each other in a Democratic primary in a predominantly Democratic district.
To: justiceseeker93
And I was just wondering if these racists were democrats ...
/sarchasm
2
posted on
07/10/2006 12:03:21 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: justiceseeker93
Since when does a Congressional Seat "belong" to anybody?................If anything, it belongs to the voters........
3
posted on
07/10/2006 12:05:38 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
To: justiceseeker93
For the record, blacks shouldn't be Democrats either.
4
posted on
07/10/2006 12:09:52 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: Red Badger
Can anybody give us a clue as to why so many American Jews continue to vote for Democrats in such large numbers?
Why?
5
posted on
07/10/2006 12:10:08 PM PDT
by
kjo
To: justiceseeker93
Democrats are just plain nasty... through and through.
6
posted on
07/10/2006 12:10:36 PM PDT
by
tflabo
(Take authority that's ours)
To: justiceseeker93
The Austin-American Statesman is running a series about Blacks that were run out of different counties across the Mason-Dixon line from the mid 1800s to the early 1900s by Whites. Perhaps this is some new ploy the Dims will use in the fall elections.
7
posted on
07/10/2006 12:11:25 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
To: neverdem
8
posted on
07/10/2006 12:11:27 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
(I don't want the world, I just want YOUR half!)
To: justiceseeker93
"Greedy," sneered the Rev. Al Sharpton about Yassky, playing on that old Jewish slur.I wonder how Sharpton would like being referred to as "uppity"?
9
posted on
07/10/2006 12:13:02 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: kjo
As TEvya says: TRADITION!
10
posted on
07/10/2006 12:14:12 PM PDT
by
jwalburg
(It wasn't the Executive that Thomas Jefferson referred to as "the Despotic Branch.")
To: justiceseeker93
Rather than being antiSemitic per se (they could be, but aren't necessarily), these racists could simply be antinonAfrican descended people, be they of Semitic, European, Asian, or Latin American descent.
To: justiceseeker93
Being Hebrew and from Alabama, I can say that most democrts here are racists, and proud of it. They have never made it secret.
12
posted on
07/10/2006 12:14:44 PM PDT
by
Lewite
(Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
To: justiceseeker93
If jews and blacks ever realize that they are nothing but willing tools of the RATS, it will be all over for the RATS.
To: justiceseeker93
Major Owens leaves a tough legacy to follow.
He once declared in a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives that a hundred million blacks perished on the journey from Africa to America, and that so many of the dead were thrown overboard that, to this day, sharks still follow the routes taken by the slave ships.
Yup...a tough act to follow. LOL
14
posted on
07/10/2006 12:16:45 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: justiceseeker93
Racism exists everywhere, including some people in the Republican party. It's not the norm anywhere, or at least not morally acceptable or socially acceptable.
But if you want to argue that Democrats are all racists and anti-Semites but no Republicans are racists or anti-Semites -- it's a free country.
But if I were you, I wouldn't be surprised if that argument doesn't get very far.
15
posted on
07/10/2006 12:18:37 PM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: Red Badger
You know, this isn't the first time the Dems have said something like this.
In 1978, Dave Durenberger was elected to the US Senate seat that was vacant due to the death of Hubert Humphrey. For years after, Dems referred to this as "Hubert Humphrey's Senate seat".
Since the 2002 election, Norm Coleman has held the seat that opened up due to Paul Wellstone's death. Dems refer to this seat as "Paul's seat" or "Wellstone's Senate seat".
To: justiceseeker93
The same thing happened to Stephen Solarz. He was a nine term incumbent, but when the ethinic composition of his district changed, he was defeated in the primaries. That's the way it works in Dem politics. It is the reason why we have a Black Caucus and the districts are gerrymandered to get results based on race.
Racial Gerrymandering
17
posted on
07/10/2006 12:19:12 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: sofaman; holdonnow
18
posted on
07/10/2006 12:19:28 PM PDT
by
AliVeritas
("One for all , all for kicking *ss and taking names" ...Scratch taking names.)
To: kjo
Blind obedience to past allegiances.............
19
posted on
07/10/2006 12:20:56 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
To: Lewite
You are from Alabama. That state sort of has a track record for racism (though there are probably plenty of people who are not strongly racist living there--probably most Alabamans). Almost everybody is racist, to some degree.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson