Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As TWA 800 Anniversary Nears, NTSB Reflects On Lessons Learned
Aero-News ^

Posted on 07/05/2006 12:14:06 PM PDT by Hal1950

With the 10th anniversary of the crash of TWA Flight 800 approaching, last week the National Transportation Safety Board released a fact sheet that reviews lessons learned from the accident investigation... and the progress toward ensuring that similar tragedies do not happen in the future.

The Board's review found that significant safety improvements have been implemented over the past ten years, but that more needs to be done to avoid another accident like TWA 800.

"The crash of TWA 800 was a watershed event for the air carrier industry," said NTSB Acting Chairman Mark V. Rosenker. "In the intervening years, a lot of thought and effort has been devoted to the issues raised by this accident, and the public is safer for it."

TWA 800, a Boeing 747, crashed on July 17, 1996, minutes after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport on a flight to Paris, France. All 230 persons aboard the airplane died in the accident. The Safety Board conducted an exhaustive four-year investigation and determined that the accident was caused by an explosion in the center wing fuel tank, resulting from ignition of the flammable fuel/air mixture in the tank.

The NTSB says the most prominent issues raised by the TWA 800 accident concerned protection against flammable fuel tank vapors, and aging electrical systems.

Rosenker noted that fleet-wide inspections and analytical reviews of fuel tank design have resulted in significant measures that have the potential to reduce the likelihood of an ignition event inside a tank, and that fuel pumps, fuel quantity indicating systems, in-tank wiring, co-routed wiring, and operational procedures have been modified to make fuel systems safer.

"Equally important," Rosenker said, "is the prospect of substantially reducing fuel tank flammability exposure - something that was seen as impractical ten years ago but is now feasible, even in this difficult era when airline operators need to be extremely conscious of costs."

But while applauding the FAA and industry for the progress that has been made, Rosenker cautioned that the process is moving much too slowly.

"Ten years after the TWA accident, fuel tank inerting systems are not in place on our airliners, and flammability exposure is largely unchanged. And proposed rule changes do not include the majority of fuel tanks which are in the wings of transport airplanes, nor this country's large fleet of cargo aircraft."

Consequently, he added, reduction in fuel tank flammability remains on the NTSB's Most Wanted List of Safety Improvements.

Rosenker also expressed disappointment that the FAA did not act on the NTSB's immediate, interim recommendations, issued a few months after the TWA accident, that were aimed at reducing the fuel tank flammability problem until longer- term solutions are in place. The recommendation was closed by the Safety Board last year and given an "unacceptable action" status.

Rosenker noted that the TWA accident gave great impetus to legislation that revolutionized the ability of the families of the victims to obtain accurate and timely information about an airliner accident and the subsequent investigation.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: ntsb; twa800; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Mr. K

Gotta link?
......


21 posted on 07/05/2006 12:37:42 PM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: true_blue_texican

Steppinalloverus once slipped up and referred to the incident as a "bombing of TWA flight 800" I believe.....


22 posted on 07/05/2006 12:39:38 PM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950
Prosecuting people who disagree with NTSB findings doesn't help their credibility any.
23 posted on 07/05/2006 12:41:12 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexPride

Yeah, I believe him and you; but what can you do when the Media and Government together cover up the murders of these poor, helpless people?

I mean, it's been almost forty years since the Kennedy assassination and NOBODY any longer believes the official findings but as long as the MSM and Government cover it up nothing is going to change.


24 posted on 07/05/2006 12:41:41 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell

I know about Stephie's slip, but what did Kerry say?........


25 posted on 07/05/2006 12:41:57 PM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexPride
I do not know what purpose it serves for our government to have lied to us about this and to keep lying about this? I want to trust the government on this, but I have a hard time doing so. We have had a presidential change with Bush now in office, so why hasn't he allowed the true facts to emerge on this, if a missile did indeed hit the plane? Since he has not, I have to either belive the government is teeling the truth, or the cover-up continues?

I personally believe that there very likely was a missile that brought this plane down. There is too much evidence and too many eyewitnesses to come to any other conclusion, IMO.

26 posted on 07/05/2006 12:43:33 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

belive-believe
teeling=telling


27 posted on 07/05/2006 12:45:17 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
The papers the following morning also had interviews with pilots on nearby aircraft who described a bright light moving toward the TWA 800 just before it blew up.

Harder to "disappear" a newspaper story.
28 posted on 07/05/2006 12:45:32 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: true_blue_texican
I don't know about Kerry. But here are 2 links.

Leon Panetta Just Characterized TWA 800 as Terrorism

News Blackout on Stephanopoulos's incompetence as a "correspondent."

29 posted on 07/05/2006 12:46:44 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MistrX

Bull.


30 posted on 07/05/2006 12:47:36 PM PDT by Rate_Determining_Step (US Military - Draining the Swamp of Terrorism since 2001!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
The papers the following morning also had interviews with pilots on nearby aircraft who described a bright light moving toward the TWA 800 just before it blew up.

Harder to "disappear" a newspaper story.

They've disappeared on the net. Old FR threads are gone too because of software changes. But I found this.

Streak of light over TWA crash site probably a meteor

November 19, 1996
Web posted at: 1:45 p.m. EST

NEW YORK (CNN) -- A streak sighted by an airline co-pilot this weekend in the skies above the TWA Flight 800 crash site "very likely" was a meteor, the FBI and an astronomer said Monday.

The FBI interviewed the Pakistan International Airlines co-pilot, identified as Nasir Aziz, when he arrived in Frankfurt, Germany, and said he was the only person on the jumbo jet who reported seeing the light.

The Pentagon issued a statement Monday confirming there were no military exercises under way in the area. rule

31 posted on 07/05/2006 12:51:33 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VOA

At least the NTSB didn't handle the WTC attack or we would be hearing about the need for safer plumbing in our sky-scapers.


32 posted on 07/05/2006 12:54:03 PM PDT by newcthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

A full tank is the best protection against an in-tank explosion and contaminating condensation.


33 posted on 07/05/2006 12:54:06 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

A lot of controversy, no doubt. If we don't have the whole story, what can be done about it, though?


34 posted on 07/05/2006 12:54:10 PM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

That and not having the fuel tank penetrated by a jihadi missle.


35 posted on 07/05/2006 12:55:49 PM PDT by newcthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Tell is all about it, including exactly what you saw.
36 posted on 07/05/2006 1:06:07 PM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: newcthem
"At least the NTSB didn't handle the WTC attack or we would be hearing about the need for safer plumbing in our sky-scapers."

On the morning 9-11-2001, I came through our office as some local Clintonites were watching replays of the second plane impact the WTC. They asked what I thought and I answered sarcastically, "Looks like some more defective fuel tank wiring to me."

Only a couple of them "got it".

37 posted on 07/05/2006 1:08:57 PM PDT by labette (Student of Murphy's Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sanders was prosecuted by the FBI - notthe NTSB.
38 posted on 07/05/2006 1:09:52 PM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: labette

ping


39 posted on 07/05/2006 1:10:06 PM PDT by Illuminatas (Being conservative means never having to say; "Don't you dare question my patriotism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Have a friend who spent several years with Boeing training pilots from airlines around the world on the the latest aircraft their companies had purchased. Asked him a few years ago what he thought about TWA Flt. 800 ... he wasn't buying the center wing fuel tank exploding as a result of a electrical spark igniting the fuel/air mixture in the tank.
Most individuals experienced with flying the Boeing 747 are like my friend, very skeptical of the NTSB finding.


40 posted on 07/05/2006 1:21:27 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson