Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Overturns Part Of Texas Congressional Map
MSNBC ^ | 6/28/2006 | MSNBC

Posted on 06/28/2006 7:14:51 AM PDT by Smogger

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned part of a Texas congressional map engineered by former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.

Challengers — Democrats and minority groups — had asked the court to declare the redrawn districts unconstitutional.

Republicans said the new map better reflects the voting patterns of the state and deny minority voting rights were violated.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: delay; election2006; electioncongress; judgislators; redistrictanytime; redistricting; scotus; texas; txredistricting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-203 next last
To: HostileTerritory; SwinneySwitch
Since Bonilla's voters are largely Anglo, with Latinos voting Democrat in Laredo, he's not the candidate of the Latino community's choice.

It was a tongue-in-cheek observation (most FReepers know what a sarcastic smart a$$ I can be). Further, and and not that I at all approve of what I'm about to type, (and I'm pinging swinney the s. texan for his input), there are many many hispanic "democrat" voters in S. Texas look for an hispanic surname before they look for party affiliation on the ballot. Of course, that theory is moot if it's a Cuellar vs. Bonilla race.

141 posted on 06/28/2006 10:53:51 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Torie; AntiGuv; AuH2ORepublican; Clintonfatigued; Kuksool; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.
"Cuellar runs in the 23rd and replaces Bonilla, the guy Cuellar beat gets the 28th, Doggett gets a more compact district and loses a bunch of Hispanics, and the 21st becomes hyper GOP. Everybody is happy - except Bonilla."

Nobody on the GOP side should be happy about that. In fact, that's not only NOT good, that's a f*cking disaster. If we shed the SOLE Hispanic Republican at the federal level in TX to accommodate this decision, it will be nothing but a complete and total racial balkanization of the delegation and will have dreadful consequences for the long run. Without having any Hispanic Republican Congressmembers will "tell" Hispanic voters that, #1 the GOP doesn't care about them, and #2 we're racist. Having high-profile members like Bonilla allows us to keep a foot in the door, and once he's shut out, that opportunity vanishes. It still remains that barring a clear violation of one-man, one-vote, the SCOTUS needs to butt out of any and all legislative redistricting, otherwise this is nothing but Democrat member protection. They sure as hell wouldn't do something about it here in TN where a minority-voting party has disenfranchised the GOP voting majority in its 9-member delegation. Outrageous.

142 posted on 06/28/2006 10:54:44 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: superdad
suspect the Republicans will draw an entirely new map that gives them even more seats.

This is true. Now that Stenholm is gone, if his district were to come back, no democrat would win it (none but Stenholm ever could) and it would be an extra Republican seat.

143 posted on 06/28/2006 10:55:42 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

What is your theory?


144 posted on 06/28/2006 10:55:44 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Plus, he's just a darned good Congressman with growing seniority, regardless of ethnicity.


145 posted on 06/28/2006 10:59:44 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

It's an interesting problem. Right now, you have one Congressman from Midland (Mike Conaway) and another one from Lubbock (Randy Neugebauer). Under the old lines, Midland and Lubbock were in one district represented by Neugebauer, while Abilene anchored Stenholm's district, and Conaway wasn't in Congress.

To restore a district to Abilene would mean throwing Lubbock and Midland back into a single district--there are only so many people living in that part of the state--and the last time that district had an open primary, it was like two scorpions in a circle. Craddick is not going to do anything to hurt Midland, I think, so they're probably stuck with the rough lines they have now. Although it would be nice to clean up the boundaries a little; they look like they were the product of careful negotiations. I can't tell one of those squares from another, so I don't know why some counties are in one district and others are in Mac Thornberry's.


146 posted on 06/28/2006 11:02:01 AM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Well the only alternative I can think of would be to try to flush Lamar Smith in the 21st CD to save Bonilla, by giving some of Lamar's Anglo precincts in Bexar to the 23rd, and replacing them with old 23rd CD Anglo Bexar precincts, and hope that Bonilla can beat Lamar in a primary. But it won't work.


147 posted on 06/28/2006 11:03:34 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Doggett will get back all of Liberal Austin.
148 posted on 06/28/2006 11:04:05 AM PDT by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Immigration reform has the GOP in a pickle. Republicans are trying to figure a way to attract more Hispanics and satisfy the pro-border security mood in conservative circles these days. So far, the GOP is failing miserably.

In fact, some Minute Men members maybe happy for Bonilla to go. To them it means one less La Raza type in Congress.


149 posted on 06/28/2006 11:04:13 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: superdad

We had to wait 10 yrs to re-district, when here in Texas the GOP was the majority party. The dimwits had become a very minority party yet we republicans had to put up the the lefty scumbags. Thank God for Tom Delay.


150 posted on 06/28/2006 11:04:17 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: shield
No one seems to be stating the really important decision made by the Supremes. RE-DISTRICTING CAN TAKE PLACE ANYTIME WHEN A STATE CHANGES PARTY COMPLICTION. NO LONGER EVERY 10 YEARS...THIS IS HUGE....THE DIMWITS HAVE LOST BIG-TIME ON THAT DECISION!!!!

I wouldn't be so sure on that. From my layman's point of view it appears that they ruled that there was nothing wrong with a legislature redistricting in order to replace a court-drawn plan with a legislature's plan. An elected legislature (the arm of the people) replacing an unelected court plan is different than a newly elected legislature replacing the plan of a prior elected legislature.

151 posted on 06/28/2006 11:06:29 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan
This is a win for the Republicans. At WORST, with good redrawing of the struck-down district (and other districts that will have be redrawn near it to compensate), we will lose one of the seats we gained in Texas.

Are you sure about that, if the court does the redrawing and does so quickly for this election?

152 posted on 06/28/2006 11:08:57 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
BTW, who says Congressional districts need to be contiguous?

If I'm not mistaken, the Congress does so routinely in every apportionment act.

153 posted on 06/28/2006 11:12:52 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

You are right and well put. I had not thought of the Warren Court in that way.

I once gave a talk at a Jewish Community Center, which was filled, as the stereotype goes, with knee-jerk liberals. In it, I praised states'-rights and said that the states were the last bastion between tyranny and them. Then I said, "anyone who is Jewish (I am part Jewish) and believes in a strong central government has a learning disability." Now I know we have many Jewish Freepers and I certainly do not mean any disregard (I am not a Jew-hating Jew), but the attacks of those who really are serious about the Bill of Rights and the democracy--which in my synagogue approaches Torah status--on the states, baffles me.

I have never been invited back--and that was a darn good lecture.

Off-subject, sorry.


154 posted on 06/28/2006 11:13:05 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Basically, it's post 126.


155 posted on 06/28/2006 11:16:06 AM PDT by AmishDude (I am the King Nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Justice Kennedy is an ass.


156 posted on 06/28/2006 11:18:04 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

The Republicans can challenge the lower-court redrawing and appeal to the SCOTUS. The Court's "conservatives" will certainly be on the lookout for any shenanigans by the lower court in response to this decision and Justice Kennedy has generally been on our side in voting cases. I stick by my statement that I don't see this decision losing us more than one of the Texas seats we gained. The Democrats lost on almost every issue before the Court.


157 posted on 06/28/2006 11:24:35 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

I am not sure why you think a corrupt GOP incumbent is more likely to win a competitive district than a non-corrupt non incumbent. In any event, it's original. :)


158 posted on 06/28/2006 11:25:48 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

By the way, if you feel that way, write your congressman urging him to strip out that section of the Voting Rights Act upon which SCOTUS relied in bouncing the Bonilla district. The majority opinion was a statutory case, not a Constitutional one.


159 posted on 06/28/2006 11:27:57 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Abilene could get thrown with Midland...


160 posted on 06/28/2006 11:28:40 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson