Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Free Republic become a paid subscription service?
Vanity | 6/23/2006 | Berlin_Freeper

Posted on 06/23/2006 12:27:30 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper

I am not certain what the legal ramifications would be in changing Free Republic from donations to a subscription service. It seems to me the switch may be detrimental to legal issues such as copyrights. If that is true I'd appreciate if someone could briefly explain that to me. However if that is not the case here is my suggestion:

I have been wondering about this for some time now and have not seen any discussions about it. So I would like to ask: Is it time for Free Republic to become an online subscription service?

Currently, the site is very antiquated. People can easily abuse the "add a keyword" feature and there seems to be a growing number of liberal trolls, foreigners and even pro-homosexual agenda-driven people infecting the site. In order to cut down on the undesirables and enhance FR at the same time, would it be advisable to start charging a monthly fee of about 15-30 bucks to be able to log into the site and post? There could also be different subscription levels like Basic, Premium or Platinum. That way, the more you pay the more features you have access to. Some of these extra-services could include storing photos or FR could be a conservative search engine for the web.

I have seen online sites where people can still read the boards for free. FR could do something like that so it would still be accessible to the Conservative public even if they are not paying members with posting priviledges.

Websites that rely heavily on banner and pop-up ads need as many hits as possible so for them restricting posting rights to subscribers might not be so desirable. However, Free Republic does not work like that. There are no ads other than some book links on the home page so the number of hits is not as crucial to the bottom line which is currently being paid for by donations.

Donations seem to be working well, but I am sure the cashflow could be improved. How many of you people honestly are put off donating money to FR because it is not what it should be? Especially in regards to the undesirable element that can be found throughout many of the threads. Wouldn't this change in format go a long way in eliminating the undesirables? I think so. Plus it would be neat to experience an upgraded more modern version of Free Republic.

Note: If you are a democrat troll, foreigner or pro-homosexual/lesbian then I am really not interested in your opinion and you should not be posting it to me (just the fact that I have to add this note is proof that something is not right).

TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 0000; abusekeywords; abusemykeywordsbaby; addakeyword; alienssuckedmybrain; allurbasebelongtous; ateabadschnitzel; bandwidthwasters; beatit; berlinloveparader; bigcupofstfu; blatt; boydidustepinit; brainsmegma; buyaclue; callingallkeywords; commie; creepyidea; crybaby; darkshearesfault; deutchlanduberalles; dietersprockets; dingleberry; drugskilledbelushi; dumbideas; eastberlinfreeper; fahnaufderautobahn; feerepublic; findanotherforum; fintanshuge; fr; freereoublic; gaykeywords; gehensiehinaus; german; goaway; haha; haimusingtehintarweb; hasselhoff; hatesforeigners; heatherhztwokeywords; hitthebricks; iaddedakeyword; iamajellodonut; ib4tz; ichbindern00b; ichbinderubermensch; ichbinstoopid; idiot; idioticvanity; idriveatravant; ihatekeywordabuse; iknownooooothhhing; ilovelesbians; iluvhomokeywords; imaforeigner; imalibtrollstalker; imissedtheloveparade; imsmarterthanyou; isthisabuse; itsartnotabuse; iwantbuttsehks; iwatchtoomuchcnnfn; jellopudding; keepitfree; keyword; keywordabuser; keywordcollage; keywordhater; keywordkreativity; keywordrock; keywordspam; keywordsrus; lederhosenskidmarks; leroyjenkins; lousybusinessmodel; makeyourtime; meineitelkeitkampf; mrleroycomehome; mrleroypushesdrugs; myleiderhosenstink; nazilover; newbiemoron; nokingbutmrleroy; nomorekeywords; notactivism; notnews; orly; paranoiac; payrepublic; posterisaclosethomo; posteristehgay; putthewallbackup; queerbaiter; shaddupalready; silly; sillyboy; sphincterenvy; stalkerbaiter; stalkinaftermidnight; stalkingbait; stoopidposts; stopkeywordmadness; strange; subscription; sureworkedforthenyt; takeahike; tminus4washere; tminusfourisgay; ufoabductee; undesirables; urallundesirables; vanityposts; wanttotouchmymonkey; wegotsignal; weird; whatsthehzkenneth; whatyousay; whodafuckareyoo; word; wrongforum; wtfiiwnm; xcitedlikealittlgirl; youaskedforit; yourpantiesrbunched
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-475 next last
To: Berlin_Freeper

>... there are people who need to go as their ideas and opinions are detrimental to the Conservative cause.<

But Bee, rubbing the wrong way is STIMULATING and stimulation is good for the brain. God bless FR and long may it be free (of subscription, that is!).

161 posted on 06/23/2006 1:09:05 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

the Kitties would be out of a job

162 posted on 06/23/2006 1:09:20 PM PDT by vigilante2 (Thank You Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

The strong influence of Free Republic would then be diminished immensely.

163 posted on 06/23/2006 1:09:46 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton

Now there's a thought. You want to post a vanity, enter your credit card number.

164 posted on 06/23/2006 1:10:00 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

No, it would be a case of FR saying they are electing to run the site differently than in the past. The users don't own the site, the servers or engage in bandwidth contracts with service providers. The owners of the site do. Free membership means that someone else is paying for your user access.

165 posted on 06/23/2006 1:10:55 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

I seriously doubt this site is about money.

If that were the case, it would have shut down long ago.

166 posted on 06/23/2006 1:10:58 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Agreed. It ain't broke, don't fix it. There's something wonderful about the freepathons, as well.

167 posted on 06/23/2006 1:11:06 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pyx

We're up to 250,000

168 posted on 06/23/2006 1:11:25 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: don-o

The one liner that I fired off was in reaction to a poster's comment that this might be a trial baloon. While the poster didn't state what specific ballon he was referring to, I thought the guy might be trying a trial ballon for possibly developing a FR type pay site for himself.

169 posted on 06/23/2006 1:11:27 PM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Charging would be a bad idea. There are plenty of forums and e-mail lists for activists. They're duller than Free Republic. It's a good idea to have a place where a wide audience can come together and participate.

Radio talk show hosts come here to look for ideas. Maybe columnists do as well. I don't think they do that with more narrowly focused sites that simply give out marching orders. Part of the pleasure is finding things that you weren't expecting, and that's rarer on the other sites.

The keywords people add can be kind of crazy, but most of the time, we just ignore them. Charge money and you won't necessarily get a more conservative site, just a duller and less essential one.

170 posted on 06/23/2006 1:11:31 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
In order to cut down on the undesirables...

Heil Hitler!

171 posted on 06/23/2006 1:11:39 PM PDT by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Oh gosh, let's see if I can remember, I think it was:

That one redirects you to the present site nowadays.

172 posted on 06/23/2006 1:11:57 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

"The problem with this is that FR has a very specific "target audience" and purpose. Which is supposed to be a thinktank for Conservative Americans and not some kind of general open door chitchat forum. My idea is trying to enhance the intended audience and thus function for Free Republic. So yes, there are people who do need to go as their ideas and opinions are detrimental to the Conservative cause.

OK, so you eliminate all the folks who you don't like or agree with. That way you have a place where everyone can pat each other on the back and think they're doing something.

Sounds pretty boring to me. Sounds like a discussion of music by a choir. Sounds like a place I'd not visit.

Here's an idea: Start a forum like you describe and see who signs up. The internet's easy. Who knows, if your idea is a good one, people will line up to subscribe to your site.

173 posted on 06/23/2006 1:12:21 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"I'm sure there are people who would consider me an "undesirable element" just as there are people who look at you the same way. I could never be a moderator simply because I would ban people who irritate me."

I'm thinking more strategic than that. It's not a matter of it being a personal issue. My idea is that true Conservatives who are the ones that this site is supposed to be meant for and who see the value of it will still be willing to pay the subscription fee because they have been donating anyway. Whereas the undesirable element would be less inclined to do so. Sure, there may be some, but I am certain way less than there are now. And if you truely are an undesirable, wouldn't it be better for you, me, FR and all else involved if you were to be encouraged in one way or another to find a more proper forum to be posting your ideas and opinions in? I think so.

174 posted on 06/23/2006 1:12:57 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mazda3Fan
" I don't want everyone agreeing with everyone happily around here, there wouldn't be any point in me coming here then."

I agree.

175 posted on 06/23/2006 1:13:01 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Note: If you are a..... foreigner.... then I am really not interested in your opinion and you should not be posting it to me (just the fact that I have to add this note is proof that something is not right).

I'm an Irishman... something must be worng with me...

You are going hear my opinion anyway - subscription is a stupid idea!!

176 posted on 06/23/2006 1:13:07 PM PDT by Irish_Thatcherite (A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!| IRA supporters on FR are trolls, end of story!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance; BJClinton

“If you have to ask how much it costs to post in breaking news, you can’t afford it.”

177 posted on 06/23/2006 1:13:07 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper


178 posted on 06/23/2006 1:13:16 PM PDT by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate our country. Zarqawi got the message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I think you and your fellow Mods do a great job....I have no complaintsThumbs Up
179 posted on 06/23/2006 1:14:14 PM PDT by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: don-o
"But, the quality of a lot of the response, sadly, reveals a lack of actual reading and thinking - before firing off a one liner."

Sometimes light with frivolity beats the dickins out of furled brow heavy.
180 posted on 06/23/2006 1:14:17 PM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-475 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson