Skip to comments.
The Hidden General
Stan McChrystal runs 'black ops.' Don't pass it on
Newsweek ^
| June 26, 2006
| Michael Hirsh and John Barry
Posted on 06/19/2006 1:46:19 PM PDT by RDTF
June 26, 2006 issue - No one would have mentioned his name at all if President George W. Bush hadn't singled him out in public. Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, West Point '76, is not someone the Army likes to talk about. He isn't even listed in the directory at Fort Bragg, N.C., his home base. That's not because McChrystal has done anything wrongquite the contrary, he's one of the Army's rising starsbut because he runs the most secretive force in the U.S. military. That is the Joint Special Operations Command, the snake-eating, slit-their-throats "black ops" guys who captured Saddam Hussein and targeted Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi.
JSOC is part of what Vice President Dick Cheney was referring to when he said America would have to "work the dark side" after 9/11. To many critics, the veep's remark back in 2001 fostered his rep as the Darth Vader of the war on terror and presaged bad things to come, like the interrogation abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay. But America also has its share of Jedi Knights who are fighting in what Cheney calls "the shadows." And McChrystal, an affable but tough Army Ranger, and the Delta Force and other elite teams he commands are among them.
After the Zarqawi strike, multinational forces spokesman Gen. Bill Caldwell refused to comment on JSOC's role, saying, "We don't talk about when special operating forces are involved." But when Bush revealed to reporters that it was McChrystal's Special Ops teams that had found Zarqawi, Caldwell had to gulp and say (to laughter), "If the president of the United States said it was, then I'm sure it was."
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqeda; bush; gwot; mcchrystal; supportthetroops; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
06/19/2006 1:46:22 PM PDT
by
RDTF
To: RDTF
God bless our black ops people.
We do not want to nor need to know every thing that is being done to keep us safe in this country.
2
posted on
06/19/2006 1:49:02 PM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: RDTF
Leave it to Newsweak to "out" the good guys and hide the bad guys. Fools.
3
posted on
06/19/2006 1:49:39 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: RDTF
Rumsfeld is especially enamored of McChrystal's "direct action" forces or so-called SMUsSpecial Mission Unitswhose job is to kill or capture bad guys, Which is just another clear reason why SecDef Rumsfeld is the perfect man for the job in today's world.
To: RDTF
They are heroes, pure and simple. Thank God they're on OUR side!
5
posted on
06/19/2006 1:51:53 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Man was made in the image of God, not pond scum)
To: hsalaw
Leave it to Newsweak to "out" the good guys and hide the bad guys. Fools. Uh, in case you missed it, it was President Bush who outed him. I saw it live, as well as poor Gen. Caldwell later trying to answer without answering.
6
posted on
06/19/2006 1:53:34 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(If "Conservatives" now want to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
To: RDTF
>Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, West Point '76, is not someone the Army likes to talk about


|
Of course, he does have his own action figure and Marvel comic line . . .
|
To: mariabush
To: RDTF
Experts partisan hacks like former (Clinton) Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down." It was civilian oversight by The Stain® and his cronies that gave us "Black Hawk Down" in the first place
9
posted on
06/19/2006 1:57:29 PM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: RDTF
"the snake-eating, slit-their-throats "black ops" guys"
Wonder if they have snake flavor MRE's for these guys?
10
posted on
06/19/2006 2:02:40 PM PDT
by
rahbert
To: RDTF
Experts like former Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Why is it not surprising that a Deputy Defense Secretary in the Clinton Administration would be critical of Special Ops? If Special Ops would have been supported by Clinton, we might not be in the situation we're in now.
11
posted on
06/19/2006 2:03:49 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: RDTF
Here is the dichotomy. The Black Ops people still got to fight for their budgets. You got to have good PR to get political muscles to pull in the Budget Wars for you but Spec Ops hates to talk about what they do since keeping Methods and Means secret is life and death for them.
Read "Masters of Chaos". Spec Ops is finally starting to play the game. I think that is a good thing.
12
posted on
06/19/2006 2:04:26 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The Democrat Party! For people who prefer slogans over solutions!)
To: Gondring
13
posted on
06/19/2006 2:04:34 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: Gondring
Umm I seriously doubt having the top guy's name know is going to hurt them in the least. It's a two way street. Good PR gets you political pull. Classifying everything makes you prime target when the budget knives comes out. Spec Ops has to learn they CAN be TOO secret.
14
posted on
06/19/2006 2:06:53 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The Democrat Party! For people who prefer slogans over solutions!)
To: RDTF
I hear he goes by another name: Jack Bauer.
15
posted on
06/19/2006 2:08:22 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,406+ snide replies and counting!)
To: RDTF
Experts like former Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down."
Sure, if only their had more 'civilian control' in Somalia, the whole thing could have been avoided... /s
16
posted on
06/19/2006 2:11:41 PM PDT
by
Daus
To: RDTF
17
posted on
06/19/2006 2:12:26 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Senator Bedfellow
18
posted on
06/19/2006 2:14:37 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: DevSix
I'm pretty enamored of them too!
19
posted on
06/19/2006 2:16:15 PM PDT
by
Shimmer128
(I see dumb people, they're everywhere. They don't even know they're dumb.)
To: Daus
Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down."
Um, didn't "Blackhawk Down" become a "Black Hawk Down" because of the "civilian oversight" not wanting to do soemthing un-PC, rather than just letting the military do its job?
20
posted on
06/19/2006 2:23:09 PM PDT
by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson