1 posted on
06/19/2006 1:46:22 PM PDT by
RDTF
To: RDTF
God bless our black ops people.
We do not want to nor need to know every thing that is being done to keep us safe in this country.
2 posted on
06/19/2006 1:49:02 PM PDT by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: RDTF
Leave it to Newsweak to "out" the good guys and hide the bad guys. Fools.
3 posted on
06/19/2006 1:49:39 PM PDT by
hsalaw
To: RDTF
Rumsfeld is especially enamored of McChrystal's "direct action" forces or so-called SMUsSpecial Mission Unitswhose job is to kill or capture bad guys, Which is just another clear reason why SecDef Rumsfeld is the perfect man for the job in today's world.
To: RDTF
They are heroes, pure and simple. Thank God they're on OUR side!
5 posted on
06/19/2006 1:51:53 PM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(Man was made in the image of God, not pond scum)
To: RDTF
>Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, West Point '76, is not someone the Army likes to talk about
|
Of course, he does have his own action figure and Marvel comic line . . .
|
To: RDTF
Experts partisan hacks like former (Clinton) Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down." It was civilian oversight by The Stain® and his cronies that gave us "Black Hawk Down" in the first place
9 posted on
06/19/2006 1:57:29 PM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: RDTF
"the snake-eating, slit-their-throats "black ops" guys"
Wonder if they have snake flavor MRE's for these guys?
10 posted on
06/19/2006 2:02:40 PM PDT by
rahbert
To: RDTF
Experts like former Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Why is it not surprising that a Deputy Defense Secretary in the Clinton Administration would be critical of Special Ops? If Special Ops would have been supported by Clinton, we might not be in the situation we're in now.
11 posted on
06/19/2006 2:03:49 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: RDTF
Here is the dichotomy. The Black Ops people still got to fight for their budgets. You got to have good PR to get political muscles to pull in the Budget Wars for you but Spec Ops hates to talk about what they do since keeping Methods and Means secret is life and death for them.
Read "Masters of Chaos". Spec Ops is finally starting to play the game. I think that is a good thing.
12 posted on
06/19/2006 2:04:26 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(The Democrat Party! For people who prefer slogans over solutions!)
To: RDTF
I hear he goes by another name: Jack Bauer.
15 posted on
06/19/2006 2:08:22 PM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,406+ snide replies and counting!)
To: RDTF
Experts like former Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down."
Sure, if only their had more 'civilian control' in Somalia, the whole thing could have been avoided... /s
16 posted on
06/19/2006 2:11:41 PM PDT by
Daus
To: RDTF
17 posted on
06/19/2006 2:12:26 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Senator Bedfellow
18 posted on
06/19/2006 2:14:37 PM PDT by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: RDTF
There's a guy named Hugo that should be very scared.
25 posted on
06/19/2006 2:48:42 PM PDT by
TexasRepublic
(Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
To: RDTF
Another example of our irresponsible news media. Anything for a story.
To: RDTF
Glad Stan McChrystal will be running things in that part of the AOR. Al qaeda and the taliwhackers are about to get a huge, harsh dose of Spec Ops whoop ass. I do find it humorously ironic though that Obambi has thrown his lot with a man who was vilified as a torturer by the libs in congress and the media while serving in Iraq under the Bush administration. I guess Stan must have attended Obambi’s re-education camp or something before being selected for his rush assignment. /s/
42 posted on
05/12/2009 5:08:22 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(God Bless Texas- where freedom still has a chance.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson