Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Crying Wolf On Separation of Powers Flap
Davd Limbaugh ^ | 05/25/06 | david limbaugh

Posted on 05/25/2006 7:13:35 PM PDT by lancer256

For a long time, Democrats have been picking on President Bush -- "King George" -- for "consolidating executive authority" and usurping legislative authority, not to mention tons of other things. But he does himself no favors by ordering that documents seized from Representative William Jefferson's office be sealed for 45 days.

Jefferson is the subject of a federal investigation into whether he accepted a bribe from two people -- who have already entered guilty pleas -- to promote a high-tech business venture. Authorities say they have a videotape of Jefferson receiving a $100,000 bribe and that they found $90,000 in cash in a freezer at his Washington D.C. apartment.

Last Saturday night, the FBI, with a duly executed search warrant in hand, entered and searched Jefferson's Capitol Hill office and seized a number of his documents. Members of both parties of Congress expressed outrage at what they claim is an egregious violation of the separation of powers doctrine.

The FBI, of course, is part of the executive branch. The congressmen's objection is that for an agency of the executive branch to raid the office of a member of the legislative branch, constitutes a dangerous executive encroachment on the legislature. They say this is the first search of a congressman's Capitol office in the more than two centuries since the first Congress convened.

(Excerpt) Read more at davidlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; congress; constitution; limbaugh

1 posted on 05/25/2006 7:13:36 PM PDT by lancer256
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lancer256
Jefferson is full of it. Congress can go after the Executive branch. See Nixon. The judiciary has free reign on the Executive as far as civil suits go. See Clinton. Why can't the Executive enforce laws against the very people who made those laws in the first place? Rule of law and not of men, anyone?
2 posted on 05/25/2006 7:16:14 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer256
On the fun side, President Bush gets to play the referee by locking up the evidence for 45 days...evidence that the FBI has had access to for several days now.
3 posted on 05/25/2006 7:22:52 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Wonder if they would be screamling like little b!tches if Jefferson had 5 kilos of herion in a safe verses the money? Bunch of pompus ass fools! Throw all the Bums OUT!


4 posted on 05/25/2006 7:22:58 PM PDT by Bommer (Attention illegals: Why don't you do the jobs we can't do? Like fix your own countries problems!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Wonder if they would be screamling like little b!tches if Jefferson had 5 kilos of herion in a safe verses the money?

Hey, these are Democrats we're talking about! They'd simply cite "personal use" for the 5 kilos of heroin. They lie shamelessly.

5 posted on 05/25/2006 7:26:49 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

I like your points on this. As for President Bush, on the one hand I don't like him sealing the documents for 45 days. On the other hand, regarding the Democrats and their abortive attack on the Republicans as the party of corruption, I dare them to demand that the documents be unsealed.


6 posted on 05/25/2006 7:30:50 PM PDT by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lancer256

Sounds like to me that such searches are way the hell over due. The division of powers was intended to protect the citizens of the USA, not shield crooks in congress from justice and place them above the laws they themselves enact.

I believe we need to enact a law that requires every politician in DC, from the President on down to address you and me as boss and show proper respect. They work for us and it's about time we made them aware of that fact.


7 posted on 05/25/2006 7:36:46 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (A government that will not enforce the laws of the land, is a government standing on quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: F.J. Mitchell

Something smells to high heaven. Did you ever wonder what happened to Cynthia McKinney or Congressman Kennedy, How did Sandy Berger get away with treason? We all know the ethics committee is a trading area that is used to cover up the problems.

My question is what have the Republicans done that allows the Democrats to ignore the Law.


9 posted on 05/25/2006 8:09:48 PM PDT by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P-40; Peach; Mo1; Bahbah; tiredoflaundry; onyx

http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/052506/news1.html

PING to this article:


10 posted on 05/25/2006 8:18:10 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paguch
My question is what have the Republicans done that allows the Democrats to ignore the Law

Exactomundo! That's your "Two-Party Cartel".

11 posted on 05/25/2006 8:35:40 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jk4hc4
"Bush's panties hit his ankles again."

LOL. That's the traditional moderate stance.

12 posted on 05/25/2006 9:29:51 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jk4hc4
Bush's panties hit his ankles again


The key word is again.


and it's starting to get really old. Even Rush is calling a Bush a "Republican" and then saying, "He's not a conservative, or pushing a conservative agenda forward".


How does it feel to be sold out by another, "professional politician"
13 posted on 05/25/2006 9:36:45 PM PDT by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lancer256

Time to send Hasert back down to the farm team.


14 posted on 05/25/2006 9:48:49 PM PDT by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paguch
It could possibly be traced back to those FBI files the Clintons had possession of. On the other hand, though, If the Republicans are innocent; how can the Dems make them dance?

It's a d*mn aggravating mystery.
15 posted on 05/25/2006 10:08:48 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (A government that will not enforce the laws of the land, is a government standing on quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Separation of powers does not create a firewall between the branches. They interact all the time. Remember the Supreme Court ordering President Nixon to turn over the tapes? And Congress, if it so chooses, can restrict the jurisdiction of federal appellate courts. To suggest that every time one branch takes action that affects another branch violates the separation of powers principle is an insult to that principle.

That's from the David Limbaugh article.

From the article you linked, I see the CBC is trying to intimidate and blackmail Pelosi; if there's a more racist group of people in the country, I've yet to read about them.

16 posted on 05/26/2006 4:02:48 AM PDT by Peach (DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lancer256
Very pathetic article. It can only please idiots.

Didn't even mention the Debate Clause at all.

Of course he couldn't could he?

17 posted on 05/26/2006 4:29:24 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40

On the fun side, President Bush gets to play the referee by locking up the evidence for 45 days...evidence that the FBI has had access to for several days now.

I am not sure this is a good idea. 45 days from now will be appox mid July. They will play with this for two weeks and then go on their summer break for thirty plus days until after Labor Day and by then not a peep. I just don't know why they don't just settle it now and allow it to fester through the entire summer into mid-term elections. Republicans need something to fight for this election and that could be one thing.


18 posted on 05/26/2006 4:31:04 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
by then not a peep.

You make some good points...and I think we will just have to wait and see. The story could fade away just like it did after the FBI raided Jefferson's home. Then again, right now the story is getting to be about the Constitutionality of the raid and about Hastert's reaction...but very little about Jefferson....so maybe a delay is worth it. And if the scope of the scandal is larger than what we know about so far, then caution is worth it.
19 posted on 05/26/2006 5:34:07 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson