Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government To Go After Employers Of Illegals?
parapundit ^ | 4/20/06 | parapundit

Posted on 05/15/2006 2:13:16 AM PDT by wotan

Government To Go After Employers Of Illegals?

The government lies so much about its intent to crack down on illegals that it is hard to take this seriously.

The government plans to crack down ever harder on employers who harbor and hire illegal immigrants, pursuing companies that ignore the law so they can exploit cheap labor.

"We are going to move beyond the current level of activity to a higher level in each month and year to come," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said yesterday. He pledged to "come down as hard as possible" on violators.

Has something changed? The trend in recent years has been toward weaker and weaker enforcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at parapundit.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; employers; sanctions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
In 2004 3 whole employers were fined for hiring illegal aliens.

That about says it all.

Expect more baloney tonight.

1 posted on 05/15/2006 2:13:20 AM PDT by wotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wotan

Troops on the border is just symbolic and stupid. An employer crackdown is what could repatriate a lot of illegals quickly and cheaply.


2 posted on 05/15/2006 2:18:55 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan
Agreed. I'd be more impressed by an administration telling us about what they have done on this issue, rather than telling us what they will do.

Promises require credibility. The current track record precludes credibility.

3 posted on 05/15/2006 2:25:54 AM PDT by RodgerD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan
Government To Go After Employers Of Illegals

Hell could not have frozen over as the rains have not turned to snow.

Lies, all lies.

4 posted on 05/15/2006 2:42:57 AM PDT by mmercier (behold, a pale horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan

This would actually be unfair to employers. Employers are very limited in how far they can go in verifying ID and background, due to anti-discrimination laws.


5 posted on 05/15/2006 2:46:28 AM PDT by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan
"In 2004 3 whole employers were fined for hiring illegal aliens."

This line is never repeated by the "Bush has increased funding for border agents by 66% crowd." Yes, they really say that despite the simple fact that all spending is up.

"Government To Go After Employers Of Illegals?"


6 posted on 05/15/2006 2:49:01 AM PDT by NapkinUser (http://www.vasquezforidaho.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

"An employer crackdown is what could repatriate a lot of illegals quickly and cheaply."

Start with roofers, Subcontractors (drywall, framers,etc.), landscapers and yes, unions.


7 posted on 05/15/2006 3:22:21 AM PDT by poobear (The most critical job that Americans will not do (just illegals): Vote for Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wotan
The government plans to crack down ever harder on employers who harbor and hire illegal immigrants, pursuing companies that ignore the law so they can exploit cheap labor.

So much for Tyson Chicken – or is the “crackdown” aimed only at landscapers and roofers?
8 posted on 05/15/2006 3:26:39 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seamoth
"Employers are very limited in how far they can go in verifying ID and background, due to anti-discrimination laws."

That's funny. I don't recall any such "anti-discrimination law" that keeps an employer for ascertaining citizenship/immigration status. Please provide proof that such exists.

9 posted on 05/15/2006 3:28:40 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wotan

You got that right pal.

A real con job.


10 posted on 05/15/2006 3:32:40 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan

Not gonna happen. The government has no spine for law enforcement. Between pressure from the business lobbies and threats of racism charges from the hispanic lobby, the gov't is like a wimpering little girl. In the end it will do what it has always done about this problem... NOTHING.

Tonights speech is just another dog and pony show to appease those who actually pay for the whole problem. But PAYING FOR IT doesn't get you a voice in Washington today. Now... if you BENEFIT from it... well, you've yourself a damn megaphone.


11 posted on 05/15/2006 3:45:27 AM PDT by navyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

It isn't the occasional illegal that might be identified, it is the accusation against someone who is not illegal that will cause the law suit, and anyway with the difficulty in determining the status of anyone with paperwork, it is beyond the scope of the hirers to know if someone is or isn't, and you have to be able to prove that they are both willing accomplices. Just pray tell how does an employer find out the status of a person they want to hire, expecially when they have all the correct documents idicating they are citizens.


12 posted on 05/15/2006 3:57:58 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wotan
I can give 'em a hint where to start...

www.wehirealiens.com

13 posted on 05/15/2006 4:08:02 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan

If Bush gives us the 'baloney' tonight... the Republican party gets the 'salami' come November. The employers and the states have to be put-on-notice that dealing with illegals means fines & jail-time.


14 posted on 05/15/2006 4:09:23 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita

Just go after the ones who have NO documents! Payroll records is another way,if he's working for less than minimum wage the employer just broke two laws. This thing is doable , we just need someone willing to do it.


15 posted on 05/15/2006 4:09:53 AM PDT by lonedawg (why does that rag on your head say holiday inn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
As long as the documents are allowed by law and appear to be genuine on their face and to relate to the person, they should be accepted. Not to do so is illegal.

Cite: http://www.uslaw.com/library/article/article_182.html
16 posted on 05/15/2006 4:11:24 AM PDT by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lonedawg
This thing is doable , we just need someone willing to do it.

Such an animal does not exist. The very nature of our system renders any true reformer impotent in the face of moneyed interests.

17 posted on 05/15/2006 4:12:18 AM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Seamoth
Employers are very limited in how far they can go in verifying ID and background, due to anti-discrimination laws.

Nonsense. In every job I've started in the last 10 years or so, on day 1 I had to show up with proof of citizenship like a birth certificate or a passport.

18 posted on 05/15/2006 4:15:22 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
If Bush gives us the 'baloney' tonight...

If?

19 posted on 05/15/2006 4:16:02 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You're missing the point. It's not about requiring ID, it's about verifying if your birth certificate is fake or not. The employer has to accept it if it looks real.


20 posted on 05/15/2006 4:17:47 AM PDT by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson