This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 05/28/2006 7:37:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1639907/posts |
Posted on 05/14/2006 12:05:44 PM PDT by JustPiper
|
BUSH SET FOR IMMIGRATION SPEECH WHITE HOUSE President Bush is getting set for a prime-time speech on Aides note the 8 p-m, Eastern Time, speech will be the president's first from the Oval Office that does not involve Iraq and the war on terrorism. And they say that reflects Bush's He's speaking as the Senate is poised to clear a compromise measure including his idea for a guest worker program. However, a rival House bill is limited to a border crackdown, and meshing the two won't be easy. Stand Up For America ! |
We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
organizations that protect our borders |
|
The Hagel-Martinez bill is a disaster. It will basically throw open the flood gates.
I've also wondered which companies hire the most illegals (have the most to lose) with Senate connections, pac money, etc.
Exactly! How many politicians are reaping rewards from the status quo? Conflict of interest?...Actively promoting illegal activity? Round and round and round we go.
Consider this, how much of your/our taxes money go to fund our opposition? How much goes to promote illegal activity?
How many tax dollars go to organizations like these?
http://www.hispaniconline.com/res&res/hisporgs/adv_pol_2.html
Anything in the Senate is a disaster IMO.
Exactly!
Just got worse -- FOX Alert Senate has reached a compromise and in the compromise bill will allow felons to stay in the USA -- expected to pass tomorrow.
This is as I suspect; they have been pouring money and influence into OUR elected representatives and even putting up their own candidates here for office.
Don't forget how HUGE Spanish-language media is now in this country, just a few big companies, e.g., Univision, Telemundo, Azteca America (also in Mexico).
Imagine what they are able to donate?
Title In a Nutshell..............
Bush's Message: I Won't Enforce Laws We Have Until I Get the Laws I Want
Human Events ^ | May 16 2006 | Mac Johnson
That about says it all...
My God, it looks almost like devolve had something to do with this.
"This is as I suspect; they have been pouring money and influence into OUR elected representatives and even putting up their own candidates here for office. "
Lou Dobbs just finished 'debating' the Mayor of Los Angeles.
He's a 'former' member of MEChA
From the Preamble to their constitution:
Chicano and Chicana students of Aztlán must take upon themselves the responsibilities to promote Chicanismo within the community, politicizing our Raza with an emphasis on indigenous consciousness to continue the struggle for the self-determination of the Chicano people FOR THE PURPOSE OF LIBERATING AZTLAN.
millions
How did that interview go??
Oh goody, so now America is Mexico's employment agency, Welfare Services and Criminal playground... I feel sick.
These greedy people in our Senate seem to hate America.
Too few with principles and guts to back it up, too many that love the money and power and nothing else.
I don't see it changing with too many people in this country with heads buried in the sand. That is how they have gotten away with this and elected time and time again.
Good read by Bob Barr of American Conservative Union Foundation.. He wrote this on april 12.. I would love to hear what he thinks now that GWB gave his speech..
Bob Barr
Bush Gives Immigration Wink and Nod
The Atlantic Journal-Constitution
April 12, 2006
"Next time the Department of Justice publishes its annual index of crime statistics, you might want to look up how many uninvited visitor incidents there have been compared to previous years. You might also want to check how many automobile owners had their vehicles involuntarily borrowed in the past year. Oh, you cant find those statistics? Well, look under burglary and vehicle theft and youll find the information youre looking for.
Using soft words to describe events, actions or persons in order to disguise their true nature is becoming a well-honed art among politicians in Washington and across the country, and nowhere more apparent than in efforts by the administration of President Bush and its supporters to sugarcoat the crisis of illegal immigration in and into the United States.
We have a president whose entire five years-plus term in the Oval Office has been defined by stressing the importance of national security and the need for ever stricter and broader criminal laws to enhance security, but who cannot bring himself to utter the term illegal alien when discussing the veritable flood of people unlawfully entering our country from Mexico. This blind spot the size of the Lone Star State enables Bush to see nothing more nettlesome than a parade of undocumented workers, many of whom perhaps just forgot their documentation at home when they kissed the wife and kids goodbye that morning as they headed off for a day at the office.
The president has spoken at length recently, in some of his rambling monologues that pass for question-and-answer sessions, of the need to secure our borders. But he still cannot recognize the fundamental problem a complete breakdown of respect for immigration laws in this country prompted by an utter failure to enforce those laws against illegal aliens and those who hire them.
Were this an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, Bush would not pass his first session, which requires participants to take the first step in rehabilitation, which is recognizing the problem for what it is and not sugarcoating it.
Instead, the president bogs himself down in trying to avoid recognizing the problem by pontificating about protecting the decency of America and reminding us repeatedly that the most important thing we are is a nation of immigrants. The decency about which Bush speaks has nothing to do with the decency of protecting the sovereignty of the nation his oath of office requires him to protect.
Deflecting and obfuscating the immigration debate by simply parroting the historical fact that Americas population growth in its earlier decades was largely the result of external migration does nothing to address the very real and current problem.
Besides, werent we taught in school that, first and foremost, America is a nation of laws? In the presidents world, in which amnesty has transmogrified into guest worker, apparently those of us who believe that first, lets enforce our laws are indecent and callous.
Of course, Bush is not alone in striving to paint over the illegal immigration debate with pleasing soft words such as decency, compassion and guest worker. Many in the moribund U.S. Senate whose courageous membership left town last Friday for another recess (this one, two weeks long and chock full of foreign junkets) without passing any border security or immigration reform legislation, despite extensively debating the dire need for such action similarly eschew the use of real words to describe this crisis of sovereignty facing America. And now, no less a luminary than California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has entered the fray, showing himself to be a metro male with the best of what Washington has to offer.
In a commentary piece appearing Monday in The Wall Street Journal, the former actor wrote eloquently of compassion for immigrants, apparently all of whom in the guvs eyes are good people. While repeatedly admonishing the Congress to get serious about the problem, Schwarzenegger could never once in the article bring himself to use the i word illegal to describe the millions of aliens in his state and across the other 49 who flouted and continue to flout our immigration laws.
There is one person in Congress, however, who sees this problem for what it is and is proposing a real solution House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.). Whether his brand of realism and tough talk will triumph over the obfuscation and double talk that permeates so much of the debate these days, however, is very much an open question."
Mr. Barr occupies the 21st Century Liberties Chair for Freedom and Privacy at the American Conservative Union Foundation.
Minuteman's Simcox: Bush Speech 'Sad, Disappointing'
NewsMax.com ^ | May 16, 2006 | Dave Eberhart
Posted on 05/16/2006 1:41:14 PM EDT by NewJerseyJoe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1633186/posts
Good comments by Barr.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.