Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Current Poll - 13% of members will turn it over to the rats????

Posted on 05/06/2006 9:51:50 AM PDT by Sonora

Current poll:

"A time for choosing: It appears that a significant number of our members are so disgusted with the GOP's failure to secure our borders against illegal aliens that they are willing to risk all by voting them out of office, even if it means Pelosi, Reid, Hillary, et al, are allowed to take charge. Is this the best course of action or should we be working harder than ever to hold the line and actually try to make a difference by getting more constitutionally-minded conservatives elected? Are you willing to give it all up or are you more determined than ever to keep the Marxists out of power?" _____

So far, 13% of members and 18%+ of participants in this poll say - turn it over to the rats. What's with that? I cannot believe that 13% of those posting here are so stupid or angry with what is happening that they would turn to the rats for the way back to perfect. Now, 13% will result in a winning vote, in a lot of cases.

Anyway, I guess that there is no compromising for some people - just dig a hole and live there while the rats are in charge. I'm so disappointed.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 13dummietrolls; beeber; bordertrolls; breakingnews; hugh; moosebitsister; openborderbots; pushpolls; savage; savagesux; series; singleissuevoters; stuned; weinerbots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 921-925 next last
To: eskimo
Perhaps it was just an emotional outburst born of frustration. I have no problem forgiving an occasional emotional fit.

Nope .. you're a crackpot

381 posted on 05/06/2006 12:55:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: oldplayer

Spector has done more for the Impeachment of President Bush than any democrat I have seen so far. So, what's this "vote republican to save Bush?"


382 posted on 05/06/2006 12:56:40 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Right, STFU hoi polli, yours is not to question why, yours is to do or die. /S
383 posted on 05/06/2006 12:56:55 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: APFel

Actually, it's more like 50+; but then, facts really aren't all that important to some posters here.


384 posted on 05/06/2006 12:57:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Bless your heart!!!


This list should be the backdrop in every Republican ad.


385 posted on 05/06/2006 12:57:14 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
The only thing that changes is the office title on the door and drop off location for the payola men.

Try again

look .. I'm not saying we don't need to clean up the republican party some .. but handing control over to the liberals is a suicide act

386 posted on 05/06/2006 12:57:26 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Bless my hearrt is right; I had to lay down for a few minutes after I compiled it. It's more than a person should have to contemplate.


387 posted on 05/06/2006 12:58:22 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

Not following you. Are you saying the polls today are more all inclusive and more accurately reflect the populations attitude?


388 posted on 05/06/2006 12:58:37 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
but, can't ya'll stay off of threads that aren't about your ONE thought???

No, they can't, even though they are suppose to stay ON TOPIC.

389 posted on 05/06/2006 12:59:25 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: eskimo; Mo1
I have no problem forgiving an occasional emotional fit.

With respect to that, I believe it was far from an emotional fit. Sometimes much can be said with few words.

390 posted on 05/06/2006 1:00:47 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Rest assured, I'm going to use that list every chance I get. You done good!


391 posted on 05/06/2006 1:01:23 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
It IS an obsession on Free Republic lately...every single thread, even if it has nothing to do with immigration has post after post about securing our borders..

That is the main reason why many folks , like myself, have cut their "FReeping" time dramatically.

392 posted on 05/06/2006 1:02:30 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (Once a Snowflake, always a Snowflake ! Good luck Tony!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Perhaps you should take it up with this guy:"
Already did, I do not see any mention of any political party.
"Free Republic is the premier online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!"

393 posted on 05/06/2006 1:02:33 PM PDT by Souled_Out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Mr. Ditter and I have discussed the Mexico problem a lot. All we can come up with as a reason that President Bush doesn't do something drastic with the border is because if Mexico can't use the US as an escape valve, there will be a revolution and Mexico will become a communist nation on our southern border.
394 posted on 05/06/2006 1:03:45 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
President Bush at least has had the guts to debate the issue of immigration, Social Security reform, tax reform, national security improvements, etc.

He could have just swept them under the rug. These issues are complex and there are many sides to each of them. As well as costs.

Those who expect Instant Gratification get nothing.

Not exactly nothing, they do get a fundraising letter from the tancredo/bay buchanan PAC.

395 posted on 05/06/2006 1:04:03 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
I know you are, like many of us, hungary for change. I would love to see things being changed as quick as possible. I might even skip the milk and eat my cereal straight from the box!

We must understand that the left has changed the culture through incremental changes. They have shown us how for 30 years the culture has been nudged from Beaver Cleaver conservatism to Queer Eye for The Straight Guy socialism. We have been like frogs in a pan of slowly heating water. Many of us were not even aware that it was happening. This stealth methodology is so below the counter that we do not know it is being used.

Obviously, the Republican Party is playing a similar stealth game to swing the culture to the right. Because it is happening so subtily, we think they are doing nothing. Some are asking, "Where's the beef?" The trouble is that in order to engage in a stealth operation, you cannot let your enemy in on the strategy. You cannot tell anyone that the beef is under the counter in a brown paper wrapper.

396 posted on 05/06/2006 1:04:15 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

The polls of prior to the 2002 and 2004 elections always showed the democrats ahead and the republicans losing. But, if you were to talk to the man on the street... your co-workers... people in daily life... you noticed that what the people said did not reflect what the polls were saying. The people supported the war but the polls showed the opposite. The people trusted the GOP for national security, the polls reflected something different. The polls did not correspond to reality in our daily lives.

This time it's different - atleast from my experience. On the steets Im seeing hard-core republicans who are very angry at the GOP and they are vowing not to vote.

I never saw the man on the street reflect the pre-election polls like they are this year.


397 posted on 05/06/2006 1:04:31 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I think Zell is almost 80...I may be wrong...but, there are a lot of people that think that McCain will be too old in 2008...and I am pretty sure that Miller is older than McCain.

Don't get me wrong, I love Zell...but, I just don't think he is a dem for you to hang your hat on.


398 posted on 05/06/2006 1:05:57 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Just reading your list made me queasy and I expect to throw up soon.


399 posted on 05/06/2006 1:06:52 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Well, whatever you do, don't take Phenegran; it makes you drive through the streets and hit security barriers. :-)


400 posted on 05/06/2006 1:07:32 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 921-925 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson