Posted on 04/24/2006 1:36:56 PM PDT by Dr. Marten
By Tabassum Zakaria
IRVINE, California (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Monday he doubted a "massive deportation" of foreigners living illegally in the United States would solve the country's immigration woes, as he tried to revive prospects for an election-year agreement in the divided U.S. Congress.
Senators returned to Washington on Monday from a two-week recess after Democrats and Republicans were unable to reach a compromise on what to do about an estimated 11.5 million to 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...
I am not a troll...
thank you for commuincating with me...
I don't have the same views on walls...and deportation...
I think we need to figure something out that works...
this IMHO isn't it...
take care
I think it would be a bureaucratic nightmare to try to send so many illegals back. Amnesty is NOT the answer either. We should at least put up a wall, fence, moat, and/or guard towers to stop the flow of aliens coming in.
One thing that would help is to stop announcing our every move weeks before we act.
"Criminals? Deport them. But law abiding hard working?"
Just which aspect of the relationship between "illegal" and "criminal" don't you understand? Illegal aliens broke the law the minute they set foot in the US, in the manner that they chose to do so. They cannot suddenly become "law abiding" when they never were.
Oh, puh-leeze. A cop shoots a rapist. A carjacker shoots a driver. Method is the same - shooting. But that is the limit of the similarity. To say the two are morally equivalent is absurd.
And the same is true with your lame-assed attempts to equate extermination and genocide of people with enforcing our own immigration laws that were in place when these people came here.
If that's the best the anti-deportation types can do, you've lost the argument.
Bush and the pols in Congress (both sides of the aisle) are trying to force us into the belief deportation is the only approach. But it isn't. If you haven't looked at other ideas, check out the paper below from the respected Center for Immigration Studies. Personally, I'd also be happy to see all of them rounded up and shipped out. It could be done if we wanted to do it. Above all we must secure our borders, otherwise the war on terror is a joke. Bush needs cold water in his face.
Attrition Through Enforcement
A Cost-Effective Strategy to Shrink the Illegal Population
http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back406.html
Part of Bush's problem right now is that the mantra that the democrats are worse is wearing thin.
Is Bush really that much better than what we would get with the democrats in control? I think Bush has done a better job on terrorism although recent events make me wonder if he isn't going "soft" on that score. But as to domestic spending and his insane amnesty proposal, how much worse could it be under the democrats?
And part of our tradition is that laws matter.
And another part of conservative tradition used to be that we learned from our mistakes. You, apparently, wish to repeat the mistakes of the Reagan amnesty.
Why don't we just lure them to the other side of the border with a free concert (with all you can drink free Corona beer). Then, don't let them back in after the concert ends.
Thanks for the synopsis.
See this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1620198/post
These are the haters!
Clarification--the people at the rally are the haters!
"Part of Bush's problem right now is that the mantra that the democrats are worse is wearing thin."
First, it was the Katrina apology, and we know what that got Bush.
Second, the Harriet Myers cronyism further hurt Bush.
Then, he allowed his staff to blindside him on the Dubai ports deal.
Now, he's feeding us the line that the choice is nothing or deportation.
Yes, the mantra that the Dems are worse is little consolation. He's lost my support.
I'm comfortable with staying home election day to teach the Republicans a lesson about ignoring their base. I did it in '92 and I'll do it again as long as I fail to see any measurable difference in the effects it has on me and my security and my pocketbook. Right now, I ain't seeing alot of difference in policy.
At one time in our past our government welcomed the challenge of putting a human on the moon. Now our failed elite establishment cannot even handle moving humans back to Mexico.
Why ask me, I have called noone names. I just don't respond if they do not warrant a response.
Yes, I know and I disagree strongly.
Secure the border first. No talk of anything else until that is done. If we do not secure the border, all the talk, the energy and the money put towards all the other "plans" are moot and a waste.
BTW, I am a STRONG advocate of putting up a wall. The technology is there (just look at the Israelis). All we need is politicians with the nads to do it.
Start with the worst 700-800 miles of border, then expand later.
You can see more of my thoughts by reading other posts that I have made over the months and years.
Okay Bushie, so maybe we should just take to shooting them on the spot. Cheaper anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.