Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Allen to Senate: Secure the Borders
NewsMax ^ | 4/16/06 | NewsMax

Posted on 04/16/2006 10:48:10 AM PDT by wagglebee

2008 presidential hopeful George Allen urged his Senate colleagues on Sunday to "put the pedal to the metal" on immigration reform and "first and foremost, secure the borders."

"[For] the people out there in the real world . . . this is a hot issue," Sen. Allen told CBS's "Face the Nation." "I think the Senate needs to put the pedal to the metal, get moving, make decisions and first and foremost, secure the borders."

On some of the amnesty bills currently before Congress, Allen said: "We should not reward illegal behavior because all you'll get is more illegal behavior."

Asked if Republican-controlled Congress would "be hurt" by further inaction on illegal immigration, Allen said: "I think Republicans need to stand up for the rule of law. I think Republicans need to stand up for securing our borders. And I think Republicans - and all people - ought to look at history."

The Virginia GOP'er noted that in 1986, amnesty was provided to the 3 million illegals then in the country.

"Now we have approximately 11 million in the country illegally," he added. "Twenty years from now we're going to have 20 million.

"We need to do this right, do it properly and learn from history."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; borders; coulditbepandering; georgeallen; illegalimmigrants; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-303 next last
To: Gelato

Hmmmm. Well, I may have to change my description to "almost" impeccable. Or, impeccable in the 21st century. That one goes back a ways, and I wonder if there's a reason for it.


201 posted on 04/16/2006 4:26:04 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

So, are you on the Allen bandwagon, sinkspur?


202 posted on 04/16/2006 4:28:37 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The emperor is wearing virtual clothes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Hmmmm. Well, I may have to change my description to "almost" impeccable. Or, impeccable in the 21st century. That one goes back a ways, and I wonder if there's a reason for it.

ROFL...

203 posted on 04/16/2006 4:29:22 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The emperor is wearing virtual clothes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
No. Allen's a wimp.

I will vote for whomever the Republicans nominate. That includes McCain or Guliani, who, IMO, are the only two who would definitely beat any Democrat they ran against.

204 posted on 04/16/2006 4:31:07 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned

"how many senators will join him?? "

Good Question ... starting with his in-state colleague, it's dubious.


205 posted on 04/16/2006 4:31:45 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Yeah. The reason for his pro-choice vote was the political climate at the time. In 1992, a Republican COULD be pro-choice and get away with it.

Since then, Allen has wised up to times. Like a true politician, Allen adjusted his voting to fit in line with what is necessary to get ahead in this party.

206 posted on 04/16/2006 4:31:54 PM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
No. Allen's a wimp.

I will vote for whomever the Republicans nominate. That includes McCain or Guliani, who, IMO, are the only two who would definitely beat any Democrat they ran against.

Well, what's the difference, then. Either way, you're guaranteed years of liberal governance.

207 posted on 04/16/2006 4:34:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The emperor is wearing virtual clothes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: All; wagglebee
My Congressman, Doc Hastings was one of 17 republicans who voted against H.R. 4437: Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005

I wrote and asked him why he voted against it.

Here is his reply.

April 12, 2006

Dear ______:

Thank you for contacting me regarding immigration reform. I appreciate you taking the time to share your views with me.

I share your concerns about illegal immigration. I believe we must strengthen control over our borders through increased manpower, new technology and smarter law enforcement coordination. Additionally, we must expand the number of detention facilities for those caught crossing the border illegally and increase penalties for those who smuggle illegal immigrants into the United States.

I oppose blanket amnesty for those currently here illegally, and I believe that our security depends on ending the current practice of turning a blind eye to the large number of illegal immigrants in our country today.

You specifically mentioned your concerns about my opposition to a bill that was approved by the House of Representatives in December. While I support the bill’s stated goal of strengthening our borders, without a reformed guest worker program it fell far short of the comprehensive solution that Central Washington and our nation needs.

To stop illegal immigration and fix our broken immigration system, we must strengthen our borders and create a legal channel for workers to come here and fill jobs that Americans are not. A functional guest worker program means our government decides who enters our country, where they are, when they must leave, and what rules they must follow.

As a top producer of labor-intensive agriculture products, our region is heavily dependent upon an immigration workforce. Without a legal channel for honest and hardworking individuals to fill these jobs, I am concerned that agriculture would be left with a serious worker shortage and our entire economy would be hurt. The United States would be at serious risk of losing our fresh fruit and vegetable production to foreign countries. Furthermore, the cost of construction and basic services would increase - raising prices for every American.

As the conversation about immigration reform continues in Congress, I will work toward a plan that meets our security and economic needs. I look forward to voting for a final plan that addresses illegal immigration in a comprehensive manner.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to contact me again in the future on any matter of importance to you.

Sincerely, Doc Hastings, Member of Congress

As you can see he is for pumping a lot of money into MORE Detention Centers. No mention of building high fences/walls to keep them out in the first place. He is also chanting the same mantra as some. No Americans will do this kind of work.

I think his real reason for voting NAY was fear he would lose the votes from all the illegals in this district.

208 posted on 04/16/2006 4:35:12 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Some might think your way was an even surer way of governance taking a rather decisive turn to the Left. One must know the market, before fashioning the ad campaign, and if your views don't fit the market, one must know how to effect the rather more difficult task, of changing the market. There are very few politicians that can achieve the latter. There just aren't.


209 posted on 04/16/2006 4:38:40 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

I view it as a pointless waste of taxpayer money to detain or otherwise incarcerate illegal aliens who have broken no other law than crossing the border. Send the illegals back and build a barricade.


210 posted on 04/16/2006 4:38:58 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I will vote for whomever the Republicans nominate. That includes McCain or Guliani, who, IMO, are the only two who would definitely beat any Democrat they ran against.


I agree. I'd much rather see Rudy, McCaine...Pence. I don't think the voters will take another big spending Southerner. That said if Allen is nominated I will not take my ball and go home ....like Allen supporter's say about Rudy or McCaine. I will work and vote to get him elected.
211 posted on 04/16/2006 4:39:18 PM PDT by Blackirish (Hillary is angry AND brittle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Thanks for the quote.

At most, it says that Allen wants a review of Roe v. Wade to account for modern scientific studies on life (which he believes have determined the right to life to begin at viability or brainwaves). He supports waiting for the courts to grant the states "more discretion" in restricting abortion.

It's telling that Allen doesn't come out and say the Roe should be completely overturned.

His lukewarmness makes me want to vomit.

212 posted on 04/16/2006 4:42:22 PM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Dear sinkspur,

"That includes McCain or Guliani,..."

If Mr. Giuliani is nominated, then social conservatives have already lost the election. I would not ever vote for Mr. Giuliani for president.

I suspect neither would a significant part of the social conservative segment of the Republican coalition.

Mr. Giuliani can't win the presidency as the Republican nominee.

Now, if he switched back to the Dems and took Hillary on in the primaries...


sitetest


213 posted on 04/16/2006 4:43:00 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Well, what's the difference, then. Either way, you're guaranteed years of liberal governance.

Uh-huh. Everybody (and I mean EVERYBODY) is to the left of a Keyster.

214 posted on 04/16/2006 4:43:18 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Gelato

That is a quote of myself. I composed it just for your reading pleasure. :) What I was saying, was that was what one would expect a prime time candidate to say, with Allen's views, as opposed to what he actually said.


215 posted on 04/16/2006 4:44:26 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Some might think your way was an even surer way of governance taking a rather decisive turn to the Left.

So, in your eyes, 'surrender is the path to victory'! ;-)

216 posted on 04/16/2006 4:45:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The emperor is wearing virtual clothes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

217 posted on 04/16/2006 4:47:49 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

The polls show Rudy or McCain can secure the nomination without the support of 75% of the posters on this site. In the General, the loss of the some of the conservative is "base," is more than made up for by a huge margin, with the votes of moderate independents and Dems, who voted for Gore and Kerry, mostly because of social issues.


218 posted on 04/16/2006 4:48:39 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

Voting Record For Allen (R)

An 'X' in the P column indicates a vote where a Representatives vote differs from the vote of the majority of their Party.

Vote Number Vote P Date Issue Question Result Description
388 Yea X 13-Nov MOTION On Approving the Journal P  
389 Nay 13-Nov H RES 275 On Agreeing to the Resolution P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2; FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1991
390 Nay X 13-Nov H R 2 On Agreeing to the Amendment F STENHOLM (SUBSTITUTE
391 Nay 13-Nov H R 2 On Agreeing to the Amendment A GORDON (SUBSTITUTE)
392 Yea 13-Nov H R 2 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions F FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1991
393 Nay 13-Nov H R 2 On Passage P FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1991
394 Nay X 13-Nov H RES 277 On Agreeing to the Resolution P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2094; FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991
395 Nay X 14-Nov H RES 280 On Agreeing to the Resolution P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3575; FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION ACT OF 1991
396 Yea 14-Nov H R 3575 On Passage P FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION ACT OF 1991
397 Present 14-Nov QUORUM 397 Call of the House P  
398 Nay X 14-Nov H R 2094 On Agreeing to the Amendment A WYLIE (EN BLOC)
399 Nay X 14-Nov H R 2094 On Passage F FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991
400 Yea 18-Nov H R 2100 On Agreeing to the Conference Report P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992 AND 1993
401 Nay 18-Nov H RES 282 SUSPEND THE RULES AND AGREE F AGREE IN SENATE AMENDMENT WITH AN AMENDMENT TO H.R. 355; BUREAU OF RECLAMATION DROUGHT ASSISTANCE
402 Present 19-Nov QUORUM 402 Call of the House P  
403 Yea X 19-Nov H R 2707 ON PASSAGE, OBJECTIONSOF PRESIDENT NOTWITHSTANDING F DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS, F.Y. 1992
404 Yea 19-Nov H RES 283 On Agreeing to the Resolution P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3595; MEDICAID MORATORIUM AMENDMENTS OF 1991
405 Yea 19-Nov H R 3595 On Agreeing to the Amendment F GRADISON
406 Yea 19-Nov H R 3595 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions F MEDICAID MORATORIUM AMENDMENTS OF 1991
407 Nay X 19-Nov H R 3595 On Passage P MEDICAID MORATORIUM AMENDMENTS OF 1991
408 Yea 20-Nov H RES 286 On Agreeing to the Resolution P WAIVING ALL POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 2521; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS F.Y. 1992
409 Yea 20-Nov H CON RES 226 SUSPEND THE RULES AND AGREE P COMMENDING THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS
410 Nay X 20-Nov H J RES 346 On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass P NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT OF PRODUCTS OF SOVIET UNION
411 Yea 20-Nov H RES 287 SUSPEND RULES AND AGREE P RELATING TO THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO H.R. 1724
412 Yea 21-Nov H R 1724 MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES P LIFTING RESTRICTIONS ON THE IMPORTATION OF GOODS FROM CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND HUNGARY
413 Yea 21-Nov H R 3371 MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES F OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1991
414 Nay 21-Nov H R 3768 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions F FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991
415 Yea 21-Nov H R 3768 On Passage P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991
416 Yea 22-Nov H R 3839 MOTION TO COMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS F LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992
417 Yea 22-Nov H R 3839 On Passage P LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992
418 Nay 22-Nov H RES 279 On Ordering the Previous Question P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2929; CALIFORNIA DESERT PROTECTION ACT OF 1991
419 Nay 22-Nov H RES 279 On Agreeing to the Resolution P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2929; CALIFORNIA DESERT PROTECTION ACT OF 1991
420 Yea 22-Nov H R 2929 On Agreeing to the Amendment F LEWIS OF CA. (NATURE
421 Nay 23-Nov H RES 294 On Agreeing to the Resolution P WAIVING THE REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 4(b) OF RULE XI, AGAINST CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES
422 Nay 23-Nov H RES 298 On Agreeing to the Resolution P TO EXPEDITE A CONFERENCE WITH THE SENATE ON A BANKING BILL
423 Yea 25-Nov S 543 MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES P FDIC IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991
424 Nay 25-Nov H RES 299 On Agreeing to the Resolution P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3750; HOUSE CAMPAIGN SPENDING LIMIT AND ELECTION REFORM ACT
425 Yea 25-Nov H R 3750 ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENT F MICHEL SUBSTITUTE
426 Yea 25-Nov H R 3750 On Motion to Recommit F HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CAMPAIGN SPENDING LIMIT AND ELECTION REFORM ACT OF 1991
427 Nay 25-Nov H R 3750 On Passage P HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CAMPAIGN SPENDING LIMIT AND ELECTION REFORM ACT OF 1991
428 Nay 26-Nov MOTION On Approving the Journal P  
429 Yea 26-Nov H R 2929 On Agreeing to the Amendment A MARLENEE
430 Yea 26-Nov H R 2929 ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENTS EN BLOC F DELAY (EN BLOC)
431 Yea 26-Nov H R 2929 On Agreeing to the Amendment F ALLARD
432 Yea 26-Nov H R 2929 On Agreeing to the Amendment F DANNEMEYER
433 Yea 26-Nov H R 2929 On Agreeing to the Amendment F NICHOLS
434 Nay 26-Nov H R 2929 On Agreeing to the Amendment F DELAY
435 Nay 26-Nov H R 2929 On Passage P CALIFORNIA DESERT PROTECTION ACT
436 Yea 26-Nov H R 2212 On Agreeing to the Conference Report P REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF MOST FAVORED NATION TREATMENT TO THE PRODUCTS OF CHINA
437 Nay 26-Nov H RES 309 On Agreeing to the Resolution P WAIVING ALL POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.J. RES. 157; DIRE EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS, 1992
438 Yea 26-Nov H J RES 157 On Agreeing to the Conference Report P DIRE EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL, 1992
439 Yea 26-Nov H R 3909 SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS P TAX EXTENSION ACT OF 1991
440 Yea 26-Nov H R 2950 On Agreeing to the Conference Report P INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ACT OF 1991
441 Nay 26-Nov H RES 301 On Agreeing to the Resolution P WAIVING ALL POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 3371; TO CONTROL AND PREVENT CRIME
442 Yea 26-Nov H R 3371 RECOMMIT CONFERENCE REPORT WITH INSTRUCTIONS F OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1991
443 Nay 26-Nov H R 3371 On Agreeing to the Conference Report P OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1991
444 Nay 26-Nov H RES 320 On Ordering the Previous Question P PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL H.R. 3435; RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION REFINANCING, RESTRUCTURING, AND IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991

30 Yea, 25 Nay, 2 Present, 0 No Vote (0.00 %)
9 votes (2.03 %) not with majority of R-party.

219 posted on 04/16/2006 4:48:56 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Uh-huh. Everybody (and I mean EVERYBODY) is to the left of a Keyster.

But you were promoting Giuliani and McCain.

And EVERYBODY is to the right of Guiliani!

And everybody is saner than McCain!

220 posted on 04/16/2006 4:49:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The emperor is wearing virtual clothes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson