Skip to comments.
Larry Klayman sues Judicial Watch
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| 4/13/06
Posted on 04/14/2006 9:50:07 PM PDT by peggybac
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-177 next last
1
posted on
04/14/2006 9:50:08 PM PDT
by
peggybac
To: peggybac
Judicial Watch took millions and millions of dollars for the Peter Paul case. They didn't spend it on Peter's case.
2
posted on
04/14/2006 9:52:03 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
Oh my.
(reaches for popcorn)
3
posted on
04/14/2006 9:53:39 PM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: peggybac
Klayman's mother must be dead.
There's no one left to sue, so he sues the guy he put in charge of the outfit he no longer owns.
What a mental case!
4
posted on
04/14/2006 9:53:47 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
To: sinkspur; TomServo; JeanS; deport; Miss Marple; A Citizen Reporter; McGavin999
5
posted on
04/14/2006 9:55:18 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
6
posted on
04/14/2006 9:57:16 PM PDT
by
TomServo
("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
To: Howlin
Where are all the Klayman defenders? Where are the pictures of this vulture, with a Scotch in his hand, horning in behind John Ashcroft?
LOL!! Wonder if Hannity will have old Lar on his show any time soon?
7
posted on
04/14/2006 9:58:02 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
To: doug from upland
8
posted on
04/14/2006 9:58:10 PM PDT
by
REDWOOD99
To: TAdams8591; Physicist
9
posted on
04/14/2006 9:59:51 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: peggybac
So who really wears the white hat and who really wears the black hat in this soap opera, anyone know??
Or are they both psycho??
10
posted on
04/14/2006 10:00:28 PM PDT
by
Babu
To: Howlin
To: sinkspur
12
posted on
04/14/2006 10:00:54 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Hey - where's FIJC??? ;-)
13
posted on
04/14/2006 10:01:06 PM PDT
by
TomServo
("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
To: doug from upland
14
posted on
04/14/2006 10:02:01 PM PDT
by
onyx
(It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
To: doug from upland
Judicial Watch took millions and millions of dollars for the Peter Paul case. They didn't spend it on Peter's case. I've heard of robbing Peter to pay Paul, but this is really confounding.
To: TomServo
You had to know this was coming.
After suing his own mother, who else was left?
16
posted on
04/14/2006 10:02:20 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Thanks we were just discussing this. I finished reading the World Net Daily Article at their site minutes ago.
17
posted on
04/14/2006 10:02:38 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
To: TAdams8591
18
posted on
04/14/2006 10:03:08 PM PDT
by
onyx
(It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
To: Howlin
After suing his own mother, who else was left?lol!
19
posted on
04/14/2006 10:03:10 PM PDT
by
TomServo
("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
To: TAdams8591
NEVER MIND.
This is the same article.
20
posted on
04/14/2006 10:03:34 PM PDT
by
onyx
(It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-177 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
