Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Klayman sues Judicial Watch
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 4/13/06

Posted on 04/14/2006 9:50:07 PM PDT by peggybac

Known for his seemingly perpetual litigation against the Clintons, Larry Klayman is turning his sights on the group he founded, charging in a lawsuit that his successor has "hijacked" the government-watchdog Judicial Watch for personal gain.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, Klayman charges, "sent out false and misleading fundraising letters, misused donor money, disparaged Klayman with supporters and the media, and took other actions which increased the damage to Judicial Watch, the donors and Klayman."

Fitton issued a statement to WND stating Klayman's "ridiculous lawsuit is full of lies and distortions which Judicial Watch will address in court. "

He called it a "tactical maneuver designed to distract attention away from the fact that Klayman owes more than a quarter of a million dollars to Judicial Watch."

"This lawsuit is without merit and is an attempt to smear Judicial Watch’s good name and the reputations of Judicial Watch’s fine employees," Fitton said.

Klayman, who has set up a website to present his case, is asking for more than $3.5 million in compensation plus punitive damages.

Fitton took over the Washington, D.C.-based group when Klayman left in the fall of 2003 to run, unsuccessfully, for a U.S. Senate seat in Florida.

"In the two and one half years since I left, Fitton, who is not a lawyer, has taken over Judicial Watch for himself, never filling my position as chairman with a distinguished lawyer to lead the organization," Klayman said. "And Fitton disparaged and harmed my reputation in an attempt to make sure that I, and others who are loyal to me, could never return to lead Judicial Watch."

Lawsuits also have been filed against Fitton in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by a Judicial Watch donor, Louise Benson, and a former director of the group's Miami district office, Sandy Cobas, who also names Judicial Watch in her suit.

Klayman emphasizes Judicial Watch was founded in 1994 as a watchdog to fight for ethics in government. Believing government could not police itself, he says his vision was for the group to be a "true independent counsel" for the people.

Judicial Watch's litigation under Klayman included challenges to President and Mrs. Clinton's Legal Defense Fund, uncovering the "Chinagate" campaign finance scandal, the theft of nuclear codes at Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratories, political abuse of the Internal Revenue Service, charges of misconduct and cover-up at the FBI – both before and after 9-11 – and Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force.

Klayman criticizes Fitton for allowing Robert G. Mills to remain as head of Judicial Watch's fund-raising department, asserting Mills defrauded donors.

Fitton knew Mills had a "shady fund-raising past and was in bed with Congressman Tom DeLay," Klayman contends.

The complaint says that one month after Klayman left Judicial Watch, the organization sent out a fund-raising letter claiming Klayman still was chairman and general counsel, causing confusion among donors. Contributions were sent to the group, the complaint says, by donors who believed Klayman was still there, "using their donations for proper purposes."

In addition, Klayman contends Fitton and Mills have defrauded donors funds given on the condition they be spent to purchase Judicial Watch's headquarters at 501 School Street, S.W., in Washington. Money designated for the sale, the complaint says, was mingled with operating funds.

Also, contends the complaint, in breech of Klayman's severance agreement, Fitton and other Judicial Watch employees told callers inquiring about Klayman that they could not discuss the reasons for his departure, leaving the erroneous impression he was forced to leave.

Fitton ordered Judicial Watch employees not to speak with Klayman, the complaint asserts, and shortly after Klayman announced his candidacy for the Senate, made a "frivolous demand," to prohibit him from ever mentioning he was founder of Judicial Watch and threatening legal action if he didn't comply.

Klayman also asserts Fitton lied about his past, "passing himself off as a college graduate of George Washington University when Klayman hired him years earlier, when in fact he had not graduated from the school and did not have even an undergraduate college degree."

In a separate suit filed in Miami circuit court, the former director of Judicial Watch's Southern Regional Office, Cobas, alleges Fitton and others took part in disparaging her Cuban and Hispanic heritage, defamed her and took other actions to force her out of Judicial Watch because she was loyal to Klayman.

Klayman said he regrets having "to take strong legal action to preserve this national treasure for all Americans."

"Not even the current leadership of my former organization is above the law," he said. "It's time to set things straight for the future and return Judicial Watch to the millions of Americans who support it. In this renewed era of government scandal and secrecy, the country needs an honest, forceful and effective Judicial Watch."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: awlarry; judicialwatch; jw; klayman; lawsuit; nationaltreasure; personalgain; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2006 9:50:08 PM PDT by peggybac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Judicial Watch took millions and millions of dollars for the Peter Paul case. They didn't spend it on Peter's case.


2 posted on 04/14/2006 9:52:03 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oh my.

(reaches for popcorn)

3 posted on 04/14/2006 9:53:39 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
Klayman's mother must be dead.

There's no one left to sue, so he sues the guy he put in charge of the outfit he no longer owns.

What a mental case!

4 posted on 04/14/2006 9:53:47 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; TomServo; JeanS; deport; Miss Marple; A Citizen Reporter; McGavin999

*Snicker*


5 posted on 04/14/2006 9:55:18 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

This is rich...


6 posted on 04/14/2006 9:57:16 PM PDT by TomServo ("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Where are all the Klayman defenders? Where are the pictures of this vulture, with a Scotch in his hand, horning in behind John Ashcroft?

LOL!! Wonder if Hannity will have old Lar on his show any time soon?

7 posted on 04/14/2006 9:58:02 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

During or after Klayman?


8 posted on 04/14/2006 9:58:10 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591; Physicist

Ping!


9 posted on 04/14/2006 9:59:51 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
So who really wears the white hat and who really wears the black hat in this soap opera, anyone know??
Or are they both psycho??
10 posted on 04/14/2006 10:00:28 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Indeed! LOL


11 posted on 04/14/2006 10:00:44 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

12 posted on 04/14/2006 10:00:54 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Hey - where's FIJC??? ;-)


13 posted on 04/14/2006 10:01:06 PM PDT by TomServo ("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland


14 posted on 04/14/2006 10:02:01 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Judicial Watch took millions and millions of dollars for the Peter Paul case. They didn't spend it on Peter's case.

I've heard of robbing Peter to pay Paul, but this is really confounding.

15 posted on 04/14/2006 10:02:17 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

You had to know this was coming.

After suing his own mother, who else was left?


16 posted on 04/14/2006 10:02:20 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks we were just discussing this. I finished reading the World Net Daily Article at their site minutes ago.


17 posted on 04/14/2006 10:02:38 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591


Please post it.


18 posted on 04/14/2006 10:03:08 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
After suing his own mother, who else was left?

lol!

19 posted on 04/14/2006 10:03:10 PM PDT by TomServo ("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

NEVER MIND.
This is the same article.


20 posted on 04/14/2006 10:03:34 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson