Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Klayman sues Judicial Watch
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 4/13/06

Posted on 04/14/2006 9:50:07 PM PDT by peggybac

Known for his seemingly perpetual litigation against the Clintons, Larry Klayman is turning his sights on the group he founded, charging in a lawsuit that his successor has "hijacked" the government-watchdog Judicial Watch for personal gain.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, Klayman charges, "sent out false and misleading fundraising letters, misused donor money, disparaged Klayman with supporters and the media, and took other actions which increased the damage to Judicial Watch, the donors and Klayman."

Fitton issued a statement to WND stating Klayman's "ridiculous lawsuit is full of lies and distortions which Judicial Watch will address in court. "

He called it a "tactical maneuver designed to distract attention away from the fact that Klayman owes more than a quarter of a million dollars to Judicial Watch."

"This lawsuit is without merit and is an attempt to smear Judicial Watch’s good name and the reputations of Judicial Watch’s fine employees," Fitton said.

Klayman, who has set up a website to present his case, is asking for more than $3.5 million in compensation plus punitive damages.

Fitton took over the Washington, D.C.-based group when Klayman left in the fall of 2003 to run, unsuccessfully, for a U.S. Senate seat in Florida.

"In the two and one half years since I left, Fitton, who is not a lawyer, has taken over Judicial Watch for himself, never filling my position as chairman with a distinguished lawyer to lead the organization," Klayman said. "And Fitton disparaged and harmed my reputation in an attempt to make sure that I, and others who are loyal to me, could never return to lead Judicial Watch."

Lawsuits also have been filed against Fitton in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by a Judicial Watch donor, Louise Benson, and a former director of the group's Miami district office, Sandy Cobas, who also names Judicial Watch in her suit.

Klayman emphasizes Judicial Watch was founded in 1994 as a watchdog to fight for ethics in government. Believing government could not police itself, he says his vision was for the group to be a "true independent counsel" for the people.

Judicial Watch's litigation under Klayman included challenges to President and Mrs. Clinton's Legal Defense Fund, uncovering the "Chinagate" campaign finance scandal, the theft of nuclear codes at Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratories, political abuse of the Internal Revenue Service, charges of misconduct and cover-up at the FBI – both before and after 9-11 – and Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force.

Klayman criticizes Fitton for allowing Robert G. Mills to remain as head of Judicial Watch's fund-raising department, asserting Mills defrauded donors.

Fitton knew Mills had a "shady fund-raising past and was in bed with Congressman Tom DeLay," Klayman contends.

The complaint says that one month after Klayman left Judicial Watch, the organization sent out a fund-raising letter claiming Klayman still was chairman and general counsel, causing confusion among donors. Contributions were sent to the group, the complaint says, by donors who believed Klayman was still there, "using their donations for proper purposes."

In addition, Klayman contends Fitton and Mills have defrauded donors funds given on the condition they be spent to purchase Judicial Watch's headquarters at 501 School Street, S.W., in Washington. Money designated for the sale, the complaint says, was mingled with operating funds.

Also, contends the complaint, in breech of Klayman's severance agreement, Fitton and other Judicial Watch employees told callers inquiring about Klayman that they could not discuss the reasons for his departure, leaving the erroneous impression he was forced to leave.

Fitton ordered Judicial Watch employees not to speak with Klayman, the complaint asserts, and shortly after Klayman announced his candidacy for the Senate, made a "frivolous demand," to prohibit him from ever mentioning he was founder of Judicial Watch and threatening legal action if he didn't comply.

Klayman also asserts Fitton lied about his past, "passing himself off as a college graduate of George Washington University when Klayman hired him years earlier, when in fact he had not graduated from the school and did not have even an undergraduate college degree."

In a separate suit filed in Miami circuit court, the former director of Judicial Watch's Southern Regional Office, Cobas, alleges Fitton and others took part in disparaging her Cuban and Hispanic heritage, defamed her and took other actions to force her out of Judicial Watch because she was loyal to Klayman.

Klayman said he regrets having "to take strong legal action to preserve this national treasure for all Americans."

"Not even the current leadership of my former organization is above the law," he said. "It's time to set things straight for the future and return Judicial Watch to the millions of Americans who support it. In this renewed era of government scandal and secrecy, the country needs an honest, forceful and effective Judicial Watch."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: awlarry; judicialwatch; jw; klayman; lawsuit; nationaltreasure; personalgain; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: TomServo

OMG, I almost fell out of my chair when I read that name............talk about a flashback!

(She's probably here under another nick -- I have a few suspicions..........LOL)


21 posted on 04/14/2006 10:04:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

For sure during. Even recently, Fitton sent out calls for donations and mentioned Peter's case. JW drafted Peter's civil suit very poorly. It is amazing that Peter is actually getting Bill Clinton into court. Depositions for Bill and Hill should be this summer, possibly within 60 days.


22 posted on 04/14/2006 10:04:53 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Let me know when he sues himself -- then I'll be impressed.


23 posted on 04/14/2006 10:05:07 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

I know that you are too nice a person to laugh or make jokes about this -- but I am doing a happy dance and laughing my white Southern butt off hard enough for the both of us. :-)

And as you can probably see, I am not dancing alone..........ROFLMAO.


24 posted on 04/14/2006 10:05:37 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: onyx

LOL, right!


25 posted on 04/14/2006 10:06:13 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
In other news, Attorney Larry Klayman is filing suit against himself, charging that he, by his own actions as libeled himself and harmed his own reputation. He is seeking unspecified damages.

When asked to comment on the case, Larry Klayman stated the suit was, "baseless and without merit", and that he would seek to defend himself vigorously.

"This is just the type of miscarriage of justice that I've always been about, " stated Klayman.

Mr. Klayman is setting up two funds, one for his defense and one for expenses related to the prosecution. He stated that he intends to solicit funds from the public.
26 posted on 04/14/2006 10:06:49 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo; deport

deport is going to be so sorry he went to bed early; he just LOVES posting that badge.


27 posted on 04/14/2006 10:06:58 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I think this jacket fits better.


28 posted on 04/14/2006 10:07:00 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

The thing is, that makes sense to anybody who has read or heard of Larry Klayman.

:-)


29 posted on 04/14/2006 10:08:04 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

too rich.. and not scrappleface.. wow..


30 posted on 04/14/2006 10:09:02 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

ROTFLOL..................


31 posted on 04/14/2006 10:09:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

OMG, this is bringing back such FOND memories of nights we spent laughing.......and just laughing.


32 posted on 04/14/2006 10:09:59 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Seriously, watch what you say on this post. Larry is watching.

Any one of you could be next.

33 posted on 04/14/2006 10:10:06 PM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Larry Klayman = Bev Harris?


34 posted on 04/14/2006 10:10:13 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
After suing his own mother, who else was left?

That's ringing a bell. He really did that? Or you were joking?

35 posted on 04/14/2006 10:10:40 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

The suit against his mother is a funny shot at him but it is probably unfair. As I remember, his mom was in charge of money that was set up for taking care of grandma. Klayman had to sue mom to get it released. At least that's how he tells it.

Relative to Peter Paul, Klayman should be giving Peter any money he might collect from a lawsuit against JW.


36 posted on 04/14/2006 10:10:55 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Since Klayman has never won a case and neither has Judicial Watch...why don't they just have a duel...they will both lose in court!!!


37 posted on 04/14/2006 10:11:15 PM PDT by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Do you have those pictures of Klayman at the awards dinner in DC?


38 posted on 04/14/2006 10:11:31 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591; Howlin; TomServo; doug from upland

It gets better!




Klayman and Benson are represented by the Philadelphia firm of Spector, Gadon and Rosen, PC. To view the complaint, go to http://www.savingjudicialwatch.org.


39 posted on 04/14/2006 10:13:09 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Klayman should be giving Peter any money he might collect from a lawsuit against JW.

I wouldn't hold my breath. ;-)

40 posted on 04/14/2006 10:13:14 PM PDT by TomServo ("You think that's funny? Shoot yourself in the leg, I'll be right back.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson