Posted on 04/09/2006 4:49:32 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, April 9th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa.; Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y.; U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; Reps. Henry Bonilla, R-Texas, Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., and J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Reps. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., and Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.; General Motors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Richard Wagoner.
THIS WEEK (ABC): House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio; former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson; actress and animal activist Bernadette Peters.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Kerry; Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.; Khalilzad; retired Gen. Anthony Zinni..
Thanks for all you do Miss Marple.
You are wonderful and far too humble!
Our Troops are heroes... but you are truly contributing to what they need most...
SUPPORT BACK HOME!
Just take a bow- say thank you- and keep up the good work...
it is okay to take credit for what you do- even if you don't do it in order to seek credit!
WE APPRECIATE YOU VERY MUCH!
$75.00
The USAF has to have reliable data on air field beacons and radars by physical survey before they can fly Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) into a particluar airport. In Western Europe this had been done way back from the 1940's onward. In 1989, when the Berlin Wall came down and communism eded in all of Eastern Europe over the next several years (1989-1992) the USAF literally had thousands of airfields they could potentially fly into, none of whch were physically surveyed. Survey teams had gone out but of course this type of work isn't accomplished overnight.
Now because of the war in the Former Republic of Yugoslavia, we became very interested in flying missions into that country but were hard pressed to survey their airfields when war was raging. We were asked to fly civilian relief missions mostly at first, but that changed over time. The war ended in Slovenia in 1991, but then focused on Bosnia and Croatia for the next 3-4 years. Finally the US took action and got the war stopped there with the IFOR (Implimentation Force) mission in 1995 (our Army deploying into the Tuzla portion of Bosnia). But we were doing various "things" in that area for a year or two before that. That involved flying into certain airfields that had not been surveyed. USAF in Europe (USAFE) asked for waivers on the USAF regulation requiring formal surveys. After IFOR began, the waiver was rescinded. That meant we were not allowed to fly into unsurveyed airfields under IFR rules.
A few weeks before Brown's plane crashed, Hillary was on a tour of US IFOR regions to build morale (HA!). At one point she wanted to make an unscheduled stop at some city's airport that had not been surveyed. The pilot told her handlers "No", and she went ballistic, stating something like "Who to hell does that airman think he's working for? I am representing the president and he'll fly me where I say so!" At least that is the scuttlebutt we all heard. This had a profound impact on the leadup to the crash later. No general would back up the pilot so they flew Hillary's entourage where it wanted to go. NOTE: This was not published in the final report. STILL - WE KNEW IT. IT IS TRUE!
The 76th Airlift Squadron flew the CT-43's (737's) for traveling dignitaries and the 86th Air Wing (Ramstein AB operations) was the parent organization. Folks were angry high command didn't support the flyers while letting Clinton administration types push them around. USAFE did ask for another waiver specifically for these types of missions but HQ USAF turned them down. Shortly thereafter, Brown's plane crashed into a mountain on final approach during a storm near Dubrovnik.
The final accident investigation report cited a "failure of command" in causing the accident. For this, the Wing Commander, a BGen, and the USAFE Director of Operations, a MajGen, were forced to retire (essentially fired).
In my opinion, the crash was due to political pressure from grandstanding Clinton administration officials wanting to use the USAf as their personal livery service while HQ USAF did nothing knowing that to do so would put their careers on the line. The whole thing was shameful.
Read about it here:
Accident invetigation (VERY detailed) Here (.pdf)
DoD News Briefing of Invesitigation Results Here
Sec of Defense Dr. William Perry's press release on investigation results Here
LOL!!
I have no idea- I am nerd.. hanging out here!
;-)
I watched the estimable Senator Kyl. He was fabulous. He does not make the mistake so many do of lettlng a false premise in the question stand and plowing ahead trying to make sense of it. He first, clearly and concisely, corrects the premise and then goes on to make his point. He is the most clear thinking and clear speaking person that I have seen today.
AMEN!!
LOL!
thanks......these folks have just burned my toast!
;-)
I agree it's all upside down. At issue is how to correct that, and that's the thing that proves so illusive. We keep talking about it, writing to the press on it, and do what we can but it remains a problem because old media, biased media and the left repeats these falsehoods over and over.
Telling the truth eventually wins, as we witnessed with the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth proved, and as voters voted for President Bush against almost all the pundits and poll predictions. We shall see if we can repeat this in November, and again in 2008.
My interpretation was that I don't think King supports "illegal" immigration, rather he supports calling it what it is, illegal.
If we don't plug up the holes in the border all the amnesty programs in the world won't help we will just need a new one every 5 years.
Plug up the holes, then we have forever to set up some sort of amnesty program(which is all we will get,IMHO)
No, you are wrong. In fact, the money that immigrants send home to their countries of origin should be something you appreciate, because it is the single reason why you don't see 10 times the amount of illegal immigration that you see today.
Not to mention the fact that all the working under the table being stopped would add to the tax coffers, help bring pathetic wages up for hard working Americans...and the benefits of cracking down on businesses paying under the table would do for reducing welfare.
You are not considering the economic costs associated with the taxation of those not earning a minimum wage. You don't want those wages taxed because they are not worth the expense of regulation, investigation and collection.
I don't buy that ILLEGAL immigrants help our economy.... at least not in any way that doesn't resemble the plantation format of slave labor....
I realize that, but what you don't understand is that your lack of understanding of the underlying economic facts are what allow politicians to use you as pons for their reelection benefit.
For those of you interested, the trascript between one democrat hack (Stephenopolous) and another democrat hack (Wilson) is now posted on abc.com. Warning: It will make you puke.
Go start a thread accusing Tancredo of being an gay closet Democrat illegal immigrant. THAT would be a "HOT" thread fo ya'
Are you joking? Who the hell do you think built this country? Our troops in Iraq are braving similar conditions in terms of the heat. You underestimate your fellow citizens or are buying into the MSM propaganda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.