Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm glad she is disappointed, there are no designated spots on the Supreme Court.
1 posted on 04/08/2006 2:25:05 PM PDT by skandalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: skandalon
She was an appointee, not an appointer.

That's a different pay grade.

2 posted on 04/08/2006 2:26:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon
I'm glad she is disappointed

Me too, and I am ecstatic that she is gone from the court.

3 posted on 04/08/2006 2:26:36 PM PDT by Bahbah (Harry Reid is a Liar;Ted Kennedy is a BIG FAT Liar: edited by tiredoflaundry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon
One wishes she could be even more disappointed.

Now, speaking of shameful episodes, one of America's oldest universities has hired on this dangerous individual as Chancellor.

4 posted on 04/08/2006 2:27:28 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

Thats OK, I'm disappointed she didn't leave 4 years earlier.


5 posted on 04/08/2006 2:28:03 PM PDT by The Republic is Lost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

I'm glad she's gone.


6 posted on 04/08/2006 2:28:14 PM PDT by SIDENET (Gonna shake it, gonna break it, let's forget it better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

Equal opportunity's a bitch, ain't it?


7 posted on 04/08/2006 2:31:20 PM PDT by Third Order
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

So she would have been happy to see Janice Rodgers Brown
appointed?


8 posted on 04/08/2006 2:33:08 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon
What's this. Quotas?

Sheesh, some Chancellor she's going to be.

What could the College be thinking having someone with that mindset in charge.

9 posted on 04/08/2006 2:33:29 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICA WOULD NOT BE THE LAND OF THE FREE IF IT WERE NOT ALSO THE HOME OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon
O'Connor was a mediocre judge and Justice. Had she been a male, she would never have been considered for the Supreme Court.
12 posted on 04/08/2006 2:38:47 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (A Liberal by any other name is still a Hypocrite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

There are a number of women President Bush would be happy to appoint.


13 posted on 04/08/2006 2:40:42 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

To quote Ann Coulter:

"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted."


14 posted on 04/08/2006 2:41:35 PM PDT by Screamname (Pray for me, Hillary is my Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

To O'Connor: Well boo-friggin'-hoo! This is not the first time you've overstepped your pay grade.


15 posted on 04/08/2006 2:41:45 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Fools and fanatics are always certain of themselves, but the wise are full of doubts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

I hope that most of the decisions rendered from her old chair disappoint her even further!!!

LLS


16 posted on 04/08/2006 2:46:29 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon
Well why did she go softie and quit on us if she were so concerned that a woman should be on the SCOTUS?
17 posted on 04/08/2006 2:47:31 PM PDT by manwiththehands (I will remember in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

Boo-hoo!


18 posted on 04/08/2006 2:48:22 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

Most of the rest of us are pretty happy about it Sandy.


19 posted on 04/08/2006 2:49:13 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon
Somebody should ask Miss Sandra if men would be justified in being "disappointed" when her appointment cut our representation on the Supreme Court by 11%.

Gender bias is alive and well...and on full display in a former Supreme Court justice.

20 posted on 04/08/2006 2:53:00 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

Agreed.


21 posted on 04/08/2006 2:54:23 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

She, like much of the left, thinks she owns the seat.

Wasn't it Schumer who referred to "our" seat, when GWB had appointed Alioto? Anyway, they didn't think GWB was appointing liberal enough justices. They implied that they had gone along with one - Roberts - but they weren't going to stand for any more messing with the O'Connor seat - theirs.


22 posted on 04/08/2006 3:00:24 PM PDT by Let's Roll ( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: skandalon

Think of how much better off the country will be when the other one is gone.


23 posted on 04/08/2006 3:01:54 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson