Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Bad Slip for 'NY Times': Katrina Victim Unmasked
E&P ^ | 03/23/2006 | By E&P Staff

Posted on 03/23/2006 8:14:51 AM PST by LM_Guy

NEW YORK For the second time in less than a week, The New York Times today admitted to a serious error in a story. On Saturday it said it had misidentified a man featured in the iconic "hooded inmate" photograph from Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Today it discloses that a woman it profiled on March 8 is not, in fact, a victim of Hurricane Katrina--and was arrested for fraud and grand larceny yesterday.

As it did in the Abu Ghraib mistake, the Times ran an editors' note on page 2 of its front section, along with a lengthy news article (this time on the front page of Section B). Again mirroring the Abu Ghraib episode, the newspaper revealed a surprising and inexplicable lapse in fact-checking on the part of a reporter and/or editor.

The original article, more than 1000 words in length, was written by Nicholas Confessore. He also wrote the news article about the error today. Without saying that he wrote the first story, he wrote today: "The Times did not verify many aspects of Ms. Fenton's claims, never interviewed her children, and did not confirm the identity of the man she described as her husband."

The editors' note states:

"An article in The Metro Section on March 8 profiled Donna Fenton, identifying her as a 37-year-old victim of Hurricane Katrina who had fled Biloxi, Miss., and who was frustrated in efforts to get federal aid as she and her children remained as emergency residents of a hotel in Queens.

"Yesterday, the New York police arrested Ms. Fenton, charging her with several counts of welfare fraud and grand larceny. Prosecutors in Brooklyn say she was not a Katrina victim, never lived in Biloxi and had improperly received thousands of dollars in government aid. Ms. Fenton has pleaded not guilty.

"For its profile, The Times did not conduct adequate interviews or public record checks to verify Ms. Fenton's account, including her claim that she had lived in Biloxi. Such checks would have uncovered a fraud conviction and raised serious questions about the truthfulness of her account."

Last Saturday, the Times editors' note disclosed that Ali Shalal Qaissi, pictured on the front page "as the hooded man forced to stand on a box, attached to wires, in a photograph from the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal of 2003 and 2004," was not that man. "The Times did not adequately research Mr. Qaissi's insistence that he was the man in the photograph," it related.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abu; abughraib; abughraibmistake; abughraibprison; ali; aliqaissi; alishalal; alishalalqaissi; confessore; corruption; donna; donnafenton; fenton; fraud; ghraib; hurricane; hurricanekatrina; iraq; katrina; mistake; new; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; nicholas; nicholasconfessore; nyslimes; nyt; nytimes; prison; qaissi; shalal; times; york
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: LM_Guy
They've been doing this right along. I had been researching an individual and found and purchased an article in the archives published September 16, 1909. I got a separate article from the Greenwich Library about the same event, and the names and facts do not quite match. I'm sure it has happened a lot over the years.

It's such a huge daily paper, it is bound to happen. When called to their attention, they do publish errata. But not on the 1909 article :-)

I'm not excusing it, just saying that's the way it is. Can you imagine all the extra time it would take to check public records before publishing a story? Some can't be found, some aren't released to anyone but a close relative, some are only released to descendants, some not at all, sometimes you have to go there in person, each county is different.

I don't want to unjustly accuse the Times of anything, but when it's a good story that might fit their agenda, they can print it and so few people read who know the real story/individual that many similar errors have probably never been caught. It's not like your hometown newspaper where more people know the names and facts.

41 posted on 03/23/2006 10:19:09 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
NYT==


42 posted on 03/23/2006 10:24:05 AM PST by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babaloo

Some stories are too good to check. If they checked this woman out and it turned out her story was fraudulent, they would not have had a hammer to back the President with. The only surefire way to prevent this is to not check the story, and print whatever lies anybody might feed you, as long as it supports your agenda.

Meanwhile the documentary evidence coming out of Iraq showing an Iraqi connection to 9/11 "may have limited evidentiary value"...


43 posted on 03/23/2006 10:28:44 AM PST by bondjamesbond (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

"paper of redactions"...


44 posted on 03/23/2006 10:30:14 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Muslims pray to Allah, Allah prays to Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Surprise, surprise, surprise....


45 posted on 03/23/2006 10:31:05 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Rush is talking about this now.


46 posted on 03/23/2006 10:33:58 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
In all seriousness, anyone who reads anything from the MSM needs to first truly understand that what he is reading is NOT the real story. It may actually be a story, but it is NOT the whole truth or even anything close.

Have you ever noticed that every time you have direct personal knowledge of a newsworthy event, when you read the story in the newspaper the next day, they have just about everything wrong? This happens over and over again. Talk to anybody who has been the subject of a newspaper story, and they'll tell you the same thing.

And yet, those same people will pick up the New York Times the next day and believe every word.

47 posted on 03/23/2006 10:38:58 AM PST by bondjamesbond (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond
"And yet, those same people will pick up the New York Times the next day and believe every word."

It happens on FreeRepublic all the time. Freepers, of all people, should be well aware that the media is almost completely untrustworthy. Yet, several times a day (hour!?!) Freepers kneejerk themselves into hysteria based on the latest lies published by the AP, CBSnews, or the NYT's. It's like Charlie Brown and Lucy. How many times do you have to get the football yanked from in front of you before you stop falling for the same old crap.

48 posted on 03/23/2006 10:46:44 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
"For its profile, The Times did not conduct adequate interviews or public record checks to verify Ms. Fenton's account, including her claim that she had lived in Biloxi. Such checks would have uncovered a fraud conviction and raised serious questions about the truthfulness of her account."

That's because the only thing the NY Times cared about was the fact that she was bashing the Bush Administration.

BTW when is this incompetent reporter going to be fired?

49 posted on 03/23/2006 11:03:47 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

Good photo, but we really need one of BURNT toast..... charred, ugly burnt toast...... that is the MSM.


50 posted on 03/23/2006 11:15:37 AM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
It's already found it's place at every Starbucks in the country. That should tell you something right there.

That it's absorbent and good for blotting up spilled coffee.

51 posted on 03/23/2006 12:55:55 PM PST by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9; Grampa Dave
"For the second time in less than a week, The New York Times today admitted to a serious error in a story. On Saturday it said it had misidentified a man featured in the iconic "hooded inmate" photograph from Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Today it discloses that a woman it profiled on March 8 is not, in fact, a victim of Hurricane Katrina--and was arrested for fraud and grand larceny yesterday."

It's no surprise that the NY Times staff can find fraudulent felons faster than any other news source...but in the past the NY Times wasn't caught quite so fast!

52 posted on 03/23/2006 12:58:08 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rokke; potlatch



53 posted on 03/23/2006 1:04:45 PM PST by devolve ( Reload/Refresh this updated new Slick Willie graphic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: radioactivereb

you cant rebuild ~ 50,000 homes with 4 days notice.

Of course, you are correct. Its the status I have difficulty with.


54 posted on 03/23/2006 3:23:26 PM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Is this Looter Guy's Looter Girl?


55 posted on 03/23/2006 3:24:51 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flada
The New York Times will soon find its rightful place next to the other tabloids at the supermarket checkout. Hey come on now! I bet you the National Enquirer report most accurately and truthfully than the NYT.
56 posted on 03/23/2006 8:56:56 PM PST by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flada
The New York Times will soon find its rightful place next to the other tabloids at the supermarket checkout.

Hey come on now! I bet you the National Enquirer report most accurately and truthfully than the NYT.

57 posted on 03/23/2006 8:57:12 PM PST by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9
What do you expect?

Guy Trebay used to work for the Village Voice before moving uptown to The Old Gray Lady.

Dana Milbank was groomed for his role as chief Bush critic at WaPo by liberal, niche magazine TNR.

Journalism is an incestuous pit of unchallenged, doctrinaire leftist groupthink, with everyone patting each other on the back and exclaiming how backward all of us proles-who are patriotic and hold conservative values-are.

58 posted on 03/23/2006 9:09:38 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: devolve

We gotta get ready for baseball season!


59 posted on 03/23/2006 9:23:26 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: devolve; ntnychik; Smartass; PhilDragoo; Boazo; dixiechick2000
My plane can fly better than your plane even with a case of the bird flu!!


60 posted on 03/23/2006 9:38:10 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson