Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Diversity Day' canceled over 'gay' speakers Homosexual couple didn't want Christians represented
WND ^ | 3-22-06

Posted on 03/22/2006 3:10:24 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Amid controversy over a homosexual speaker, a high school in Wisconsin has canceled its "Diversity Day" event scheduled for tomorrow.

Speakers at Viroqua High School in Viroqua, Wisc., for the biannual event were to include Hmong, Jewish, Muslim, American Indian, African American, Latino, Buddhist, physically handicapped and poor people, the La Crosse Tribune reported.

The paper said, however, the event was called off late last week after the Florida-based public-interest legal group Liberty Counsel raised a potential challenge, insisting the program include the viewpoint of a former homosexual.

The last event, in 2004, initially was canceled by the school board after 400 people signed a petition protesting the inclusion of speakers on homosexual and transgender issues. The event was reinstated in the spring, however, when elections changed the board's membership.

This time, a fax from Liberty Counsel stated local pastor Don Greven of Bad Axe Lutheran Church and the grandfather of a senior at the high school raised concerns about no Christian, or formerly homosexual, viewpoint being included among the speakers, the Tribune reported.

Liberty Counsel argued a federal court in Michigan had ruled a similar exclusion unconstitutional.

"By excluding the Christian and ex-gay viewpoints, the (Viroqua) District violates the Establishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection," the group said.

Greven, 61, told the paper diversity means, "in our understanding, that the various views are presented, and that was lacking."

Gregg Attleson, a teacher on the Diversity Day planning committee, told the LaCrosse paper the intent is to introduce students to minorities and people with alternative lifestyles.

"Our students are not going to be living their lives out in Viroqua," said Attleson. "They'll be out and about in the world – in jobs, in the military, in the university – and they're going to come into contact with people of different backgrounds. And we feel it would be real helpful for them in a nice safe place, like a high school, to have contact and be able to dispel some of the stereotypes."

Attleson said the homosexual couple scheduled to speak refused to be on the program alongside an "ex-gay" viewpoint, saying they would be uncomfortable.

The committee then decided it would be best to cancel the whole program.

The agenda was to feature two keynote speakers, a movie and small-group discussions with three of the 10 speakers.

Attleson said students were free to choose which small groups to attend and could opt out of the program if parents contacted the school in advance.

"Non-positive groups were not what we were going for," said committee member Ellen Byers in response to the decision to cancel.

The homosexual couple's appearance was not about "proselytizing" or alienating people, she said. The planners wanted to help resolve misunderstandings about the issue because the school has homosexuals among its student body.

"It's ironic, because we're trying to be tolerant and at the same time we might be accused of being intolerant, said Byers, an English teacher.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: diversity; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; libertycounsel; preducators; tolerantleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Mad Dawg

LOL well as we ALL know, the Constitution guarantees us the right to never be offended, and never be made to feel uncomfortable, EVER!

That is the leftist view, whether they know it to be true or not. It's all about the mantra. Say it loud, say it often.


21 posted on 03/22/2006 3:45:32 PM PST by gidget7 (Get GLDSEN out of our schools!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky
Apparently this couple of queers do not realize that, "...they're going to come into contact with people of different backgrounds."

Excellent point!! LOL the liberals are such hypocrites.
22 posted on 03/22/2006 3:48:51 PM PST by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I have to agree that cancelling the program was pretty ridiculous. I don't usually make a big deal of being gay (or even mention it to anyone not interested), but I have to say that if your objective is to promote diversity, it's silly to exclude someone just on the basis of their (current or former) sexual orientation. And any gay person who is "uncomfortable" being around an ex-gay needs to grow up and face the fact that not everyone who thinks they're gay is going to be happy with that fact and may, indeed, want to change.


23 posted on 03/22/2006 3:54:23 PM PST by tonenili
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

"Non-positive groups were not what we were going for," said committee member Ellen Byers in response to the decision to cancel.

_______________________________________________________
"Non positive" -- only a lunatic liberal could come up with that Orwellian lingo.


24 posted on 03/22/2006 3:56:36 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Here is a link to, and the opening passage from, the federal decision in Michigan to which, I am confident, Liberty Counsel was referring:
This case presents the ironic, and unfortunate, paradox of a public high school celebrating “diversity” by refusing to permit the presentation to students of an “unwelcomed” viewpoint on the topic of homosexuality and religion, while actively promoting the competing view. This practice of “one-way diversity,” unsettling in itself, was rendered still more troubling -- both constitutionally and ethically -- by the fact that the approved viewpoint was, in one manifestation, presented to students as religious doctrine by six clerics (some in full garb) quoting from religious scripture. In its other manifestation, it resulted in the censorship by school administrators of a student’s speech about “what diversity means to me,” removing that portion of the speech in which the student described the unapproved viewpoint.

All of this, of course, raises the question, among others presented here, of what “diversity” means and whether a school may promote one view of “diversity” over another.

25 posted on 03/22/2006 4:01:37 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance; dukeman
Here's another thread about this school board decision about cancelling "Diversity Day".
School Cancels Diversity Day Rather than Include Viewpoint of Christians and Former Homosexuals

Posted by dukeman
On 03/22/2006 2:28:00 PM CST · 67 replies · 1,680+ views

26 posted on 03/22/2006 4:05:57 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tabi Katz

SO true.


27 posted on 03/22/2006 4:16:20 PM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

a high school in Wisconsin
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What about the First Amendment Rights of the parents and students NOT to assemble in any school that would propose this drivel?

Government schools trash the First Amendment Right to free assembly every day, in every school in America.

They are an abomination!


28 posted on 03/22/2006 4:25:16 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Well, would not an ex-gay, now Christian, be an alternative to an alternative life style? What could be more alternative then that?
&&&&&&&&&&&&

I am laughing and laughing.
29 posted on 03/22/2006 4:28:16 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Orwellian is right. Black is white, up is down, right is wrong. You must tolerate us but, we don't have to tolerate you.


30 posted on 03/22/2006 4:34:23 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
This practice of “one-way diversity,” unsettling in itself, was rendered still more troubling -- both constitutionally and ethically --

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&77

It is impossible for any government school to be politically, culturally, or religiously neutral. This incident is an excellent example.

The government school, no matter what it does, will be ESTABLISHING the worldview of some ( with religious content and serious consequences) and undermining the worldview of others. How can this be constitutional? Answer: It can't.

Government schools are an abomination precisely because they trash the human rights guaranteed in our state and federal constitutions.
31 posted on 03/22/2006 4:35:51 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Attleson said the homosexual couple scheduled to speak refused to be on the program alongside an "ex-gay" viewpoint, saying they would be uncomfortable.....translation: "We might wet our fag panties."


32 posted on 03/22/2006 4:40:10 PM PST by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Attleson said the homosexual couple scheduled to speak refused to be on the program alongside an "ex-gay" viewpoint, saying they would be uncomfortable.

OMG...and the Christian students who would be "uncomfortable" having to listen to homosexual people don't count! These people are INSANE.

33 posted on 03/22/2006 4:43:58 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

"It's ironic, because we're trying to be tolerant and at the same time we might be accused of being intolerant, said Byers, an English teacher."

Ya think?


34 posted on 03/22/2006 4:45:43 PM PST by NavySon (Ted Kennedy, the only man whose BAC is greater than his IQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Everyone is equal...but some are more equal than others.


35 posted on 03/22/2006 4:46:30 PM PST by NavySon (Ted Kennedy, the only man whose BAC is greater than his IQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

"Our students are not going to be living their lives out in Viroqua," said Attleson. "They'll be out and about in the world – in jobs, in the military, in the university –"

What if it's in a church? Oh I forgot it's illegal to be a priest in a blue state (unless you're a "minority").


36 posted on 03/22/2006 4:48:57 PM PST by NavySon (Ted Kennedy, the only man whose BAC is greater than his IQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

"The planners wanted to help resolve misunderstandings about the issue because the school has homosexuals among its student body."

Possible misunderstandings:

1) The speakers actually believe in equality.
2) They believe in equality other than just when it's in their favor.
3) They're not prejudice.
4) They are tolerant of people who disagree with them.

If anyone else has anything to add to the list, post it.


37 posted on 03/22/2006 4:54:48 PM PST by NavySon (Ted Kennedy, the only man whose BAC is greater than his IQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

"Non-positive groups were not what we were going for..."

Oh I get it! They must mean non HIV positive!


38 posted on 03/22/2006 4:56:52 PM PST by NavySon (Ted Kennedy, the only man whose BAC is greater than his IQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

The irony and hippocracy is giving me a headache...


39 posted on 03/22/2006 4:58:40 PM PST by NavySon (Ted Kennedy, the only man whose BAC is greater than his IQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavySon

Hey! Welcome aboard, good to see young adults here!


40 posted on 03/22/2006 5:00:30 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson