Posted on 03/22/2006 3:10:24 PM PST by Indy Pendance
Amid controversy over a homosexual speaker, a high school in Wisconsin has canceled its "Diversity Day" event scheduled for tomorrow.
Speakers at Viroqua High School in Viroqua, Wisc., for the biannual event were to include Hmong, Jewish, Muslim, American Indian, African American, Latino, Buddhist, physically handicapped and poor people, the La Crosse Tribune reported.
The paper said, however, the event was called off late last week after the Florida-based public-interest legal group Liberty Counsel raised a potential challenge, insisting the program include the viewpoint of a former homosexual.
The last event, in 2004, initially was canceled by the school board after 400 people signed a petition protesting the inclusion of speakers on homosexual and transgender issues. The event was reinstated in the spring, however, when elections changed the board's membership.
This time, a fax from Liberty Counsel stated local pastor Don Greven of Bad Axe Lutheran Church and the grandfather of a senior at the high school raised concerns about no Christian, or formerly homosexual, viewpoint being included among the speakers, the Tribune reported.
Liberty Counsel argued a federal court in Michigan had ruled a similar exclusion unconstitutional.
"By excluding the Christian and ex-gay viewpoints, the (Viroqua) District violates the Establishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection," the group said.
Greven, 61, told the paper diversity means, "in our understanding, that the various views are presented, and that was lacking."
Gregg Attleson, a teacher on the Diversity Day planning committee, told the LaCrosse paper the intent is to introduce students to minorities and people with alternative lifestyles.
"Our students are not going to be living their lives out in Viroqua," said Attleson. "They'll be out and about in the world – in jobs, in the military, in the university – and they're going to come into contact with people of different backgrounds. And we feel it would be real helpful for them in a nice safe place, like a high school, to have contact and be able to dispel some of the stereotypes."
Attleson said the homosexual couple scheduled to speak refused to be on the program alongside an "ex-gay" viewpoint, saying they would be uncomfortable.
The committee then decided it would be best to cancel the whole program.
The agenda was to feature two keynote speakers, a movie and small-group discussions with three of the 10 speakers.
Attleson said students were free to choose which small groups to attend and could opt out of the program if parents contacted the school in advance.
"Non-positive groups were not what we were going for," said committee member Ellen Byers in response to the decision to cancel.
The homosexual couple's appearance was not about "proselytizing" or alienating people, she said. The planners wanted to help resolve misunderstandings about the issue because the school has homosexuals among its student body.
"It's ironic, because we're trying to be tolerant and at the same time we might be accused of being intolerant, said Byers, an English teacher.
Can't let the truth sneak out to those kids, now, can we?
"The committee then decided it would be best to cancel the whole program."
Good plan!
So even the event swings both ways.
Christianity didn't fit the agenda because the objective was to corrupt youthful minds.
It's only 'diverse' if you agree with the liberal agenda.
Apparently this couple of queers do not realize that, "...they're going to come into contact with people of different backgrounds."
I didn't see wiccans either. :)
The best way to combat this idiocy is to require events such as this to represent so many viewpoints including those they don't like (Christian, conservative) that it's impossible to organize such an event, or at least not without bogging it down with controversy over who gets to speak. It's too bad that we have to do this on the left's terms, but there are still chinks in their legal armor to exploit.
Well, would not an ex-gay, now Christian, be an alternative to an alternative life style? What could be more alternative then that?
'"It's ironic, because we're trying to be tolerant and at the same time we might be accused of being intolerant, said Byers, an English teacher.'
Ironic isn't the first word that pops into my mind.
I suppose you think you're funny, smart aleck.
I guess that's O.K., though, 'cuz that WAS funny.
See, they hadn't taken the Tom Daschle School of Social Discourse classes. "Uncomfortable" isn't as good a reason for doing something cowardly and stupid as "Deeply troubled" or "Concerned" is. You gotta get this stuff right!
Seriously, what a bunch of candy-butts! I didn't want to do it because I was "uncomfortable"? Yeah, Nathan Hale didn't want to hang, nor Paul Revere to ride, nor anybody to do anything worthwhile because it made them "uncomfortable". Sheesh!
'Diversity Day' canceled over 'gay' speakers Homosexual couple didn't want Christians represented"
When interviewed the gays insisted they weren't against Christians, but rather they just love irony.
Seems no one's more intolerant than those professing tolerance.
Or Pyromaniac Arsonists for that matter! What? So my kicks get me thrown in jail for a few years. I'm diverse, too!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.