Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Infeasibility of Rebuilding New Orleans(Is anyone listening?)
Pure Energy Systems.com ^ | Sept. 23, 2005 | Paul Noel & Mary-Sue Haliburton

Posted on 03/01/2006 5:43:29 PM PST by kellynla

The President of the United States of America has announced in a theatrically heroic manner that New Orleans will be rebuilt. At first blush, what he has proposed seems like a nice idea.

That is the best that can be said of it.

A wise evaluation of the facts tells us that the horrendously expensive project he has proposed is a fool’s errand. The city is doomed. There is absolutely no hope for it in the long term. Emotionally pleasing as it may be, rebuilding New Orleans prophesies an even worse disaster than what we have just seen. Hurricanes are only a small part of the threats destroying the city.

(Excerpt) Read more at pesn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: hurricanekatrina; katrina; marysuehaliburton; nawlins; neworleans; nola; rebuildingneworleans; rebuildingno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
"In fact, as reliably reported in the Hunstville Times on Sunday September 11, 2005, breakage of the levees occurred two days before the arrival of Katrina."
1 posted on 03/01/2006 5:43:33 PM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I agree that parts of New Orleans should not be rebuilt. But this article is full of too much political nonsense, and not enough common sense, to take seriously.


2 posted on 03/01/2006 5:51:05 PM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (My Homeland Security: Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Massively large amounts of fill compacted for a reasonably solid base, and then rebuild. And then only some of it.


3 posted on 03/01/2006 5:53:13 PM PST by vpintheak (Liberal = The antithesis of Freedom and Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

That guy is weird. Based on his past articles, he appears to believe that oil companies are causing earthquakes and tsunamis.

According to this guy, everybody is wrong but him.


4 posted on 03/01/2006 6:00:52 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Move it or lose it...(because all it will take is one well placed IED on one of the levees and we'll have to same mess all over again)

"The Mississippi River should be with all deliberate speed aimed down the Atchafalaya, and an appropriate new port built in that river mouth, with other management issues taken into account?"


5 posted on 03/01/2006 6:05:39 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The city is doomed

We're all doomed I tell ya. It will take a long while but the entire city will eventually be rebuilt. If one was about 25 years old and could wait 10-20 years for a return, now would be an excellent time to buy selective properties in N.O. I wish I had to money and time to invest. This is a gift horse buying opportunity over the long term.

6 posted on 03/01/2006 6:06:52 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
This pretends to be a factual solution, but isn't. Almost a year ago, in "The Hart-Miller Solution to New Orleans," I gave the solution. There is an unlimited and renewable amount of "fill dirt" in the Mississippi. It would be a 10-year project, but the low areas of NO could be filled until the entire remaining city was ABOVE flood level. Then is would be safe.

This was exactly the process that Galveston used to reconstruct itself after its hurricane/flood of 1905?. And Galveston rebuilt itself without any federal aid.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Which, Being Believed, Was, Whether It Was or Not"

7 posted on 03/01/2006 6:12:08 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com now, while you're thinking about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

What a doofus, everybody knows that the NWO is using HAARP to do that. <;p


8 posted on 03/01/2006 6:13:16 PM PST by Jack of all Trades (Liberalism: replacing backbones with wishbones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

"It would be a 10-year project"
why not just move the city???


9 posted on 03/01/2006 6:13:45 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
Massively large amounts of fill compacted for a reasonably solid base, and then rebuild. And then only some of it.

There is nothing to put that solid base on. It's much down to the underlying rock, and that's a long, long ways down. Just move it, Fake French Quarter and all, over to the Atchafalaya, but don't allow any housing, retail or warehousing too close to the river. Only enough structures to support the port and the locks that will probably be needed.

10 posted on 03/01/2006 6:17:31 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

"A wise evaluation of the facts tells us that the horrendously expensive project he has proposed is a fool’s errand"

ditto


11 posted on 03/01/2006 6:18:30 PM PST by stand4somethin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Move it or lose it...(because all it will take is one well placed IED on one of the levees

Worse if that IED is placed on the Old River Control Structure. Then the rivers would very very quickly shoot down the Atchafalaya, leaving NO low and dry, and sinking even faster than it is now, and making a mess of the channel that we, the US will need to replace the port of New Orleans.

12 posted on 03/01/2006 6:19:35 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Bush said also that we would rebuild the twin towers "in no time".


13 posted on 03/01/2006 6:20:34 PM PST by bennowens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
There is an unlimited and renewable amount of "fill dirt" in the Mississippi. It would be a 10-year project, but the low areas of NO could be filled until the entire remaining city was ABOVE flood level. Then is would be safe.

Maybe, but you can't build on it while you're filling it, and as you indicate, you'd have to continuously fill it as the weight of the fill caused the base to sink farther into the delta muck.

14 posted on 03/01/2006 6:22:25 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Gato, what do you think of the idea:

"The Mississippi River should be with all deliberate speed aimed down the Atchafalaya, and an appropriate new port built in that river mouth, with other management issues taken into account?"


15 posted on 03/01/2006 6:25:37 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
"And Galveston rebuilt itself without any federal aid."

As did Chicago, San Francisco, and Johnstown. If the will of the residents is to rebuild, they will. Theirs was, and they were.
16 posted on 03/01/2006 6:26:56 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bennowens

"Bush said also that we would rebuild the twin towers "in no time"."

Well he's just a dirty little liar isn't he. Glad we have you around to catch these woppers.


17 posted on 03/01/2006 6:29:53 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
So, today we were discussing why it is Jennings County, Indiana has a deposit of gypsum, and not clay, even though it's mostly surrounded on the North by an immense, multi-million year old ocean beach.

Has to do with the days when New Orleans was still called North Vernon, and the head of the Gulf of Mexico sat right there.

There's entirely too much detail on the matter to report all of it here, but the Mississippi Valley has been filling in for a long time. More recently it's been sinking into the muck because all the good stuff is being shipped out to the middle of the Gulf.

18 posted on 03/01/2006 6:34:36 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
He goes from stating some important facts and uses all that tos et us up for a shot at the petroleum industry.

This guy has an axe to grind.

19 posted on 03/01/2006 6:38:48 PM PST by capt. norm (Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I have heard of this "Atchafalaya solution" before. The only problem with that is that the Atchafalaya Basin South of I-10 is pretty much in the same condition as the New Orleans area, i.e., swamp land.


20 posted on 03/01/2006 6:54:43 PM PST by El Gran Salseron (The FR Canteen's Resident Equal Opportunity Male Chauvinist Pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson