Posted on 02/28/2006 3:03:58 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
WASHINGTON, February 28, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The pro-life movement has made such gains in arguing for the humanity of the unborn, that abortionists and their apologists are finding their rhetoric is too harsh, even in traditionally supportive political circles.
The campaign slogans familiar to everyone who has read a news report on abortion: “my body my choice,” “women's choice is a human right,” are no longer resonating with the US public that is increasingly confronted with the devastating psychological and social aftermath of abortion. With even such politicians as notorious abortion campaigner Hillary Clinton trying to position herself as a moderate, the abortion industry is worried for its PR and clout.
Francis Kissling, head of the abortion industry front organization, Catholics for a Free Choice, said the movement is losing on what it used to consider its own ground. “There is a deep-seated fear (in the abortion lobby) that if you address the moral issues, you're going to lose,” Kissling said.
“But we're losing anyway. It's only by addressing the moral issues that we'll get some relief on the political questions.”
The problem is becoming so dire, that a leftist think tank, the Center for American Progress, is hosting a summit for abortionists, lobbyists and activists of all kinds to talk about how to address the situation. The meeting this Friday in Washington DC will attempt to forge a new public relations strategy.
An article in the current edition of Newsweek featured Peg Johnston, an abortionist in upstate New York who will be attending the Washington meeting. Johnston said that she eschews the euphemisms and jargon of the abortion lobby when speaking to clients. She says that her patients speak in terms of “babies” and “killing” so she uses those terms as well.
“At first I thought they were picking up the language from [anti-abortion protesters] outside. But then I started really tuning in to my patients, and I realized, 'She really feels that way'.” Johnston says.
But the shift to a warmer, more “compassionate” public image by abortionists has been developing for some time. George Tiller, the abortionist in Wichita, Kansas who specializes in killing late-term babies, features on his website photos of a macabre ‘baptism’ ceremony for the dead child which clients can have for an extra fee.
Claire Keyes told Newsweek that she plans to establish a “sanctuary space” in the abortion facility she directs in Pittsburgh and has offered ‘baptismal’ ceremonies.
Many abortion organizations, including Planned Parenthood now include a “chaplain” on the payroll whose job it is to help clients overcome their “guilt feelings” for having killed what few now deny is a human child.
Advances in sonogram technology were hailed by the pro-life movement as a great help in the argument for the humanity of the unborn, but this has not necessarily translated into moral comprehension.
Kirsten Moore, spokesman for the Reproductive Health Technologies Project says a focus group showed that women who see the pictures of their unborn child on a sonogram are as ready to kill as they ever were. “Women who are thinking about ending a pregnancy are not asking, ‘Is this a life?’ They know that it is. They are asking, ‘Can I take care of this baby?” Moore told Newsweek.
Despite the best efforts of pro-lifers the result, at least among committed abortion activists, is a further distancing from the fundamental notion that it is wrong to kill. The shift may be one that pro-lifers are not prepared for.
“We’ve really moved onto the next rung of the ladder haven’t we?” Jim Hughes, National President of Campaign Life Coalition commented to LifeSiteNews.com. “What do you do when they admit that they are killing babies and claim the right to feel good about it?”
“Abortion was bound to lead to this and the idea has finally sunk in,” Hughes said. “We have made the case for the humanity of the unborn only to convince the abortionists to claim the right to kill human beings without guilt. It’s a moral shrug. How do you argue with a shrug?”
Have you noticed that the women who howl loudest about protecting their "right" to an abortion are the least likely to need one?
"This is deceptive because it is an incomplete description. The baptismal and remembrance service is provided for miscarriages or stillborn fetuses. In other words babies that were wanted, but which died before childbirth."
Not so. Tiller's clinic actually provides services for babies aborted there (they have a Unitarian minister or one of that ilk.) People do not go there for miscarriages or stillbirth. The babies were wanted until they were discovered to have some defect. Their parents can tell them, "we love you, we're really sorry, you're in a better place now, it's better for you too this way," and have a clergyperson back them up.
Mrs VS
Bump
And many more don't see the mental illness spreading to killing embryonic stem cells. It is a scientific fact that human life begins at conception. What researchers are doing with combining a somatic cell and a female ova in a petri dish is called "conception" of a human being. The mantra here is that it is for a wonderful cause to promote cures for dreadful diseases. Researchers have been working with embryonic stem cells for 20 years and still no cures for any diseases. Just like Planned Parenthood making money hand over fist from abortions, these embryonic stem cell researchers expect to make money hand over fist experimenting on tiny humans. It is all evilness from the pit of hell and that is where it will all end up.
"But the shift to a warmer, more “compassionate” public image by abortionists has been developing for some time. George Tiller, the abortionist in Wichita, Kansas who specializes in killing late-term babies, features on his website photos of a macabre ‘baptism’ ceremony for the dead child which clients can have for an extra fee."
There is a special place in hell for this guy.
Interesting admission that the abortion lobby ignores the REAL views of the people they're trying to talk into murdering their babies. Instead of considering that she's wrong, of course, the goal is to find a way to trick women into not seeing the humanity of the babies they've been murdering for decades. Lousy ghouls!
The thing prolifers must keep in mind is the reality that human beings can adapt to anything, including killing of the innocent. Like the guards at Nazi prison camps, who ushered thousands of men women and children into the "showers," hauled the bodies out and stacked them up like cordwood, then went home to a nice dinner with the wife and kids. Or Doctor Josef Mengele, who took kids for rides around the camp in his chauffered limo, and handed them sugar candy, before having them dropped off at the gas chamber door. Or simply numb, like paid killers of the mob--"nothing personal--it's just business."
Probably anyone could do it, if they are willing to pay the price, with their soul.
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Thanks for the ping. I think.
I'll be back later to read it.
Funded by the Islamicists no doubt. In another thread here on FR, there was an Islamicist expreessing dismay over America's recent pro-life bent, since it meant the infidels were not killing themselves off before birth...
No cheers, unfortunately.
I'm glad that that was an EX-girlfriend!!!
The most important and vicious victory of the pro-abortion forces is that they have convinced women that killing their babies is 'better for the child' than giving them up for adoption.
It's unbelievable. I don't even think that people really believe that kids are better off dead than adopted; but they don't want to have to endure the social discomfort of having everyone know they're pregnant and aren't keeping the child. And hey-----it's legal to kill the little bugger so why not take the easy way out?
Not wanting anyone to know they're pregnant is likely a large part of it, too, I guess they don't want to admit THAT. It's just twisted.
Bull. I've spoken with ultrasound providers at crisis pregnancy centers, and they tell me that 80-90% of abortion-minded women decide against abortion when confronted with the image of their unborn child. This compares to 15% of abortion-minded women who decide against abortion when receiving counseling alone.
I'm proud of you that she is now your ex! I am always amazed that they can say straight-faced that you should kill those poor babes for their own good. Sheesh
Human butchery has indeed evolved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.