Skip to comments.
Qaeda claim: we 'infiltrated' UAE Gov't
New York Post ^
| 25 February 2006
| Niles Lathem
Posted on 02/25/2006 6:18:25 AM PST by Racehorse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Maybe S.P.E.C.T.R.E is really behind it all.
1
posted on
02/25/2006 6:18:27 AM PST
by
Racehorse
To: Racehorse
Looks like Bush didn't bother to read his own intelligence reports before defending the ports deal. This is going to add more heft to that political tsunami that threatens to crash down on the White House.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
2
posted on
02/25/2006 6:20:44 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Racehorse
Translation..... They have three Paki tea boys serving the government office buildings.
3
posted on
02/25/2006 6:21:28 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: Racehorse; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; ...
We don't have to act desperate about this port deal. Too many here are jumping fearing we won't be liked. There's much about the UAE that's not understood. As to who needs who the most?
The UAE isn't a charitable organization that's giving us the right to dock there for free. We pay them. But that's not why were important to them. We're important because if we weren't there the Iranians would swoop over and take their oil fields. And if we said "dock our ships for free or we're pulling out, they would dock our ships for free. Now, the relationship is equal. When the war is over, it will be unequal in our favor.
My suggestion to the scardy cats who are afraid the UAE won't like them? They should stop acting so desperate. It's not attractive.
4
posted on
02/25/2006 6:23:07 AM PST
by
GOPJ
To: Racehorse
Alqaeda sympathizers are right here in our own congress.
5
posted on
02/25/2006 6:24:23 AM PST
by
OldFriend
To: Racehorse
Ah.....SPecial Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion. Do you think a Walther PPK in 7.65mm or .380 ACP is enough to halt Al Qaeda????
6
posted on
02/25/2006 6:25:23 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
To: Racehorse
"Your homeland is exposed to us. There are many vital interests that will hurt you if we decided to harm them."
Note to Al Qaeda: Jack Bauer is a real person and he is in that van 2 vehicles behind you.......
7
posted on
02/25/2006 6:25:31 AM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(When in doubt, I ask myself: "What would Jack Bauer do?" My boss isn't going to like the answer...)
To: GOPJ
I'm just standing by my principles. We shouldn't lease our sovriegnty to ANY foriegn governments and I want to know what kind of proof we'll have that money won't find it's way into the hands of terrorists.
8
posted on
02/25/2006 6:26:03 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: Racehorse
Why would they announce this, if it were true?
It seems rather to one's own disadvantage to publicly point out any kind of covert asset or operation of the type that the announcement describes.
I wonder if this isn't just more smoke and mirrors from 'truce offer' Al Qaeda.
9
posted on
02/25/2006 6:26:18 AM PST
by
Riley
("What color is the boathouse at Hereford?")
To: Racehorse
10
posted on
02/25/2006 6:26:32 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(In a Hole in the Ground, there Lived a Fobbit...)
To: GOPJ
.....We pay them....
Because we do business because they ,the GCC, are capitalists and perhaps the most pure capitalists of all.
11
posted on
02/25/2006 6:27:10 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: GOPJ
"We don't have to act desperate about this port deal. Too many here are jumping fearing we won't be liked. There's much about the UAE that's not understood. As to who needs who the most?"But then NO ONE will be running U.S. ports!! AND we'll be considered "racists" and xenophobes"!! /sarc
12
posted on
02/25/2006 6:27:16 AM PST
by
F16Fighter
(Government is not reason [but]..a dangerous servant and a fearful master.~ George Washington)
To: Racehorse
I question the timing of this being Bush's fault.
13
posted on
02/25/2006 6:28:40 AM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: goldstategop
"Looks like Bush didn't bother to read his own intelligence reports before defending the ports deal."
Or, just maybe instead of relying on propaganda statements from Al Qaeda, he knows the reality of the situation instead. It is amazing how suddenly 4 year old Al Qaeda propaganda is suddenly taken as the gospel truth.
14
posted on
02/25/2006 6:28:40 AM PST
by
Rokke
To: Racehorse
Ah well a case could be made that our very own liberals were and are foot soldiers in Saddam's army.
To: cripplecreek
>>lease our sovriegnty
Please. Running parts of port operations is not "leasing our sovriegnty [sic]".
Many foreign-owned companies are already running similar operations in the U.S., including Hutchison Whampoa.
16
posted on
02/25/2006 6:30:04 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: Riley
"Why would they announce this, if it were true?" My thoughts, too. Nothing better than to make false claims - al qaeda is good at that.
To: Racehorse
Probably, but Al Qaeda, Zarqawi, bin Laden, and Co. are pretty desperate to stay in first on our threat list right now. Anyone can make the front page by blowing something up. But even that's hard to do if you're spending most of your time hiding under rocks so that you won't get blown up.
18
posted on
02/25/2006 6:31:51 AM PST
by
dr_who_2
To: GOPJ
But that's not why were important to them. We're important because if we weren't there the Iranians would swoop over and take their oil fields. And if we said "dock our ships for free or we're pulling out, they would dock our ships for free. Why is it that so few here understand this concept?
19
posted on
02/25/2006 6:32:41 AM PST
by
raybbr
(ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
20
posted on
02/25/2006 6:34:30 AM PST
by
digitalbrownshirt
(http://digitalbrownshirt.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson