To: GOPJ
I'm just standing by my principles. We shouldn't lease our sovriegnty to ANY foriegn governments and I want to know what kind of proof we'll have that money won't find it's way into the hands of terrorists.
8 posted on
02/25/2006 6:26:03 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: cripplecreek
>>lease our sovriegnty
Please. Running parts of port operations is not "leasing our sovriegnty [sic]".
Many foreign-owned companies are already running similar operations in the U.S., including Hutchison Whampoa.
16 posted on
02/25/2006 6:30:04 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: cripplecreek
I want to know what kind of proof we'll have that money won't find it's way into the hands of terrorists. Lots of reasons to look closely at this deal... we have the time - we're not desperate.
21 posted on
02/25/2006 6:36:06 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: cripplecreek
...lease our sovriegnty...You are being hysterical.
45 posted on
02/25/2006 7:18:00 AM PST by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: cripplecreek
We shouldn't lease our sovriegnty to ANY foriegn governmentsExactly how is letting them unload ships "leasing our sovereignty?"
59 posted on
02/25/2006 7:26:02 AM PST by
Howlin
("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson