1 posted on
02/21/2006 5:38:25 PM PST by
kellynla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: kellynla
THIS is what we should be talking about instead of Cheney and ports.
2 posted on
02/21/2006 5:40:49 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(atheist)
To: kellynla
3 posted on
02/21/2006 5:42:06 PM PST by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: kellynla
The Media is about to become silent on the issue of WMD.
5 posted on
02/21/2006 5:43:04 PM PST by
ardara
To: kellynla
Guess the Libs and the Media don't want to face the fact they may have to
"Eat Crow"
6 posted on
02/21/2006 5:43:20 PM PST by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: kellynla
MSM .... CHIRP CHIRP (sounds of crickets)
7 posted on
02/21/2006 5:43:31 PM PST by
Delmarksman
(Pro 2A Anglican American (Ford and Chevy kill more people than guns do, lets ban them))
To: kellynla
Haven't you heard, Bill Tierney is a Jesus freak. The tapes are not to be believed!
To: kellynla
Okay look, I don't deny that there's a generic media bias against anything that would make Bush look good, but this is such a gigantic story that is so muffled, even among many conservative sites. (Even here, it gets only moderate play.)
There's got to be more to it than mere media bias. What is it?
10 posted on
02/21/2006 5:45:57 PM PST by
Democracy In Iraq
(When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
To: kellynla
On one of the tapes, made in 2000, two years after Saddam kicked out U.N. weapons inspectors, two Iraqi scientists can be heard briefing Hussein on their progress in enriching uranium using plasma separation. If successful, their work would have given Saddam the fissile material he needed to make a nuclear bomb.
To: kellynla
Any members of Congress, who were aware of this proof of WMDs yet actively opposed the Iraq war, are guilty of treason. Indict.
12 posted on
02/21/2006 5:48:07 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(It's a safe bet to oppose Clinton on any given issue)
To: kellynla; ohioWfan; DCPatriot; Peach; McGavin999; tet68; A Citizen Reporter; daybreakcoming; ...
21 posted on
02/21/2006 5:53:09 PM PST by
onyx
(IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
To: kellynla
The media is never going to make a big deal about this. It's up to Bush to spread this news. I can't figure out why he has spen the last 2 1/2 years hiding any news that supported the war.
28 posted on
02/21/2006 5:56:21 PM PST by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: kellynla
Call me crazy, but it looks like the biggest rope-a-dope ever is coming. Could it be just in time for the mid terms? I think the Arab harbor deal might be related in some crazy way. Just a hunch.
29 posted on
02/21/2006 5:57:01 PM PST by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: kellynla
The tapes were officially presented Sunday by former FBI translator Bill Tierney to a private conference of former weapons inspectors and intelligence experts in Arlington, Va.
Tierney is being discredited right now.
William Tierney, the former United Nations weapons inspector who unveiled the so-called "Saddam Tapes" at a conference in Arlington, Virginia, Saturday, told National Review Online that God directed him to weapons sites in Iraq and that his belief in the importance of one particular site was strengthened when a friend told him that she had a vision of the site in a dream.
52 posted on
02/21/2006 6:22:24 PM PST by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
To: ducks1944; Ragtime Cowgirl; Alamo-Girl; TrueBeliever9; maestro; TEXOKIE; My back yard; djreece; ...
Funny thing about dictators and tyrants: Very often they are meticulous record keepers. The fall of the Third Reich, the Soviet Union and Saddam Hussein's Iraq all produced treasure troves of information. In Iraq's case, there were so many documents and records that even now only a small fraction have been translated and analyzed. Among them are 12 hours of conversations from the early 1990s through 2000 between Hussein and his top advisers. They reveal, among other things, how Iraq was working on an advanced method of enriching uranium, how Iraq was conspiring to deceive U.N. inspectors regarding weapons of mass destruction and how these weapons might be used against the U.S.
53 posted on
02/21/2006 6:23:39 PM PST by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: kellynla
Maybe this is why the "port control issue" has exploded in recent days. Shhhhhh, Bush was right...
77 posted on
02/21/2006 7:04:16 PM PST by
TheSpottedOwl
(Support the fence....grow a Victory Garden!)
To: kellynla
78 posted on
02/21/2006 7:08:17 PM PST by
agrace
(Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me if you know so much. Job 38:4)
To: kellynla
To: kellynla
Does that miserable lying hag Maureen Dowd know about this? Let's get her comment...
83 posted on
02/21/2006 7:23:01 PM PST by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: kellynla
Book-marked to send my liberal brother.
Thank you for posting this.
To: kellynla
In one exchange taped in April or May 1995, Saddam's son-in-law, Hussein Kamil al-Majid, briefed Saddam and his aides on his success at concealing Iraq's WMD from inspectors. "We did not reveal all that we have," he said. "They didn't know the extent of our work on missiles."I'm shocked that the government of Saddam Hussein would conceal evidence from UN inspectors. Shocked!
114 posted on
02/21/2006 9:41:22 PM PST by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
(left unchecked, Saddam Hussein...will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson